Oops, I didn't mean to be the "author" of the fix.
For future reference, what is the proper set of hg commands for
propagating JDK7-9 changes unmodified into opendjk6 so that the original
"author" info is retained?
Ivan
On 09/04/2015 17:08, Yuri Gaevsky wrote:
Changeset: ea6357d20812
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2015-04-09 16:36 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/ea6357d20812
8051359: JPopupMenu creation in headless mode with JDK9b23 causes NPE
Reviewed-by: serb, pchelko
! src/share/classes/sun/awt/SunToolkit.java
Changeset: e7948a59ef12
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2015-01-13 16:52 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/e7948a59ef12
6364329: jstat displays "invalid argument count" with usage
Reviewed-by: jbachorik
Contributed-by: Yuri Gaevsky
! src/share/classes/sun/tools/jstat/Ar
Changeset: 4173e592ffa3
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-12-15 21:23 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/4173e592ffa3
6938454: 2 new testcases for bug: Unable to determine generic type in program
that compiles under Java 6
Reviewed-by: aph
Contributed-by: nikgor
Changeset: 20eebcd42dae
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-12-15 21:19 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/20eebcd42dae
6938454: Unable to determine generic type in program that compiles under Java 6
Reviewed-by: aph
Contributed-by: nikgor
! src/share/classes/com/
any issues.
According to Nikolay, this fix is not a strightforward port but a
reworked fix for the 7's 6938454.
Thanks,
Ivan
6938454: Unable to determine generic type in program that compiles under
Java 6
Reviewed-by: aph
Contributed-by: nikgor
On 11/12/2014 22:01, Andrew Haley wrote
Oops, wrong thread, sorry.
I meant to reply on Nikolay's letter about
OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle JDK
6u45 compiles fine
Thanks,
Ivan
On 15/12/2014 17:56, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Hi Andrew and all,
I am about to push this change for Nikolay.
Given
fix is not a strightforward port but a
reworked fix for the 7's 6938454.
Thanks,
Ivan
6938454: Unable to determine generic type in program that compiles under
Java 6
Reviewed-by: aph
Contributed-by: nikgor
On 15/12/2014 17:12, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
On
Not sure what link [1] should be demonstrating. Could you send a link to
the diff associated with the fix?
Thanks,
Ivan
On 21/11/2014 07:03, KUBOTA Yuji wrote:
Hi all,
JDK7 and JAX-WS RI 2.2.6 solved the low socket backlog of HttpServer [1].
However, JDK6 still provides the HttpServer which
Changeset: 79f0c07a9ecf
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-07-18 15:53 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/79f0c07a9ecf
OPENJDK6-37: OpenJDK6-b32 cannot be built on Windows
Summary: The fix is really simple this time and only affects two files in JDK
workspace.
Reviewed-
Don’t have an answer this but CC-ing openjdk6-dev
Ivan
On 23 Jun 2014, at 07:03, KUBOTA Yuji wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I got ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.subFormat
> via sun.net.httpserver.ExchangeImpl when I used com.sun.net.httpserver
> with OpenJ
m do get a huge credit for keeping openjdk6
vibrant, secure and robust and the community appreciates that!
Thank you,
Ivan
On 25 Jun 2014, at 17:58, Andrew Hughes
mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com>> wrote:
- Original Message -
As this is a backport, there's no reason to alloca
the other mail regardimg Deepak's finding in a
separate email.
Thanks,
Ivan
*From:* Andrew Hughes <mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 22:30
*To:* Ivan Krylov <mailto:i...@azulsystems.com>
*Cc:* jdk6-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:jdk6-dev
,
Ivan
On 23/06/2014 17:09, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 06/23/2014 02:05 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
The main motivation for this fix was exactly to fix building JBoss EAP
certification bundle (for 6.2.0).
This fix exists in IcedTea (6650759-missing_inference.patch) but for
whatever reason was never promoted
Changeset: e62c8af01197
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-06-23 17:25 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/e62c8af01197
OPENJDK6-35: backport of JDK-6650759 to openjdk6
Summary: Inference of formal type parameter (unused in formal parameters) is
not performed.
Revi
Andrew,
The main motivation for this fix was exactly to fix building JBoss EAP
certification bundle (for 6.2.0).
This fix exists in IcedTea (6650759-missing_inference.patch) but for
whatever reason was never promoted to openjdk6.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 23/06/2014 16:37, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 06
you,
Ivan
PS Funny that I can not "work" ob bugs like
https://java.net/jira/browse/OPENJDK6-35. Hence - I can not close them.
PPS In my previous request for review (for bug34) the synopsis was
incorrect. It should have been
"Inference with wildcard types causes selection of inapplicable method "
Actually I was not correct here. There was a small change compared to
the stock.
However this is a good reminder for future changes.
We have another change in langtools coming up soon.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 20/06/2014 19:42, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:32 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Hello
Changeset: 619655c4e72d
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-06-20 17:29 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/619655c4e72d
PENJDK6-33: Update copyright headers introduced by the fix for OPENJDK6-32
Summary: The fix in question just updates copyright headers brought in by fix
Changeset: 98c2e6dca8f6
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-06-20 17:27 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/98c2e6dca8f6
OPENJDK6-33: Update copyright headers introduced by the fix for OPENJDK6-32
Summary: The fix in question just updates copyright headers brought in b
Changeset: b221ddfc8abb
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-06-20 17:20 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/corba/rev/b221ddfc8abb
OPENJDK6-33: Update copyright headers introduced by the fix for OPENJDK6-32
Summary: The fix in question just updates copyright headers brought in by
Changeset: c711bcdb18ea
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-06-20 16:52 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/c711bcdb18ea
OPENJDK6-34: OpenJDK6-b31 backport of JDK-6638712 to openjdk6
Summary: Original bug synopsis-Inference of formal type parameter (unused in
formal
Sure.
On 20/06/2014 15:45, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:32 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
please review the fix for OPENJDK6-34: backport of JDK-6638712 to openjdk6
Inference of formal type parameter (unused in formal parameters) is not
performed
No changes compared to the openjdk7 fix
/browse/JDK-8047378
webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ikrylov/webrev.openjdk6bug34.langtools/
Thank you,
Ivan
contact both Oracle and Azul for clarification on this
matter.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 30 May 2014, at 19:44, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/30/2014 03:26 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> sorry for the late reply.
>>>
>>> This header was suggested by
Changeset: a68f89bda2cf
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-05-30 17:27 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/a68f89bda2cf
OPENJDK6-32: OpenJDK6-b31 isn't compatible with Windows platform
Summary: Fixing broken build in openjdk6 for windows. This change bumps up the
VS comp
Changeset: 60ace1f28c4b
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-05-30 17:11 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/corba/rev/60ace1f28c4b
OPENJDK6-32: OpenJDK6-b31 isn't compatible with Windows platform
Summary: Fixing broken build in openjdk6 for windows. This change bumps up the
VS co
Changeset: 2bf10193a736
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-05-30 17:10 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/2bf10193a736
OPENJDK6-32: OpenJDK6-b31 isn't compatible with Windows platform
Summary: Fixing broken build in openjdk6 for windows. This change bumps up the
VS
Hi Alex,
Your patch is a good idea but it needs to be a different commit.
Let's see if there are any objections to Vladislav's proposal.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 24/05/2014 21:19, Alex Kasko wrote:
Hi,
On 05/23/2014 04:07 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Hi,
On 05/23/2014 11:36 AM, karnaukh...
is up to the maintenance lead to decide what we do here for windows.
Thanks,
Ivan
How easily can people using VS2003 change to VS2010? Is it just a matter of
downloading a new package?
Thanks,
Visual studio is not free. A license needs to be purchased. However at
this time neither VS2003 nor
.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 11/02/2014 00:13, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
My goal here was just to point out some of the issues/scope etc so
that you
and the present openjdk6 maintainers can decide how to proceed.
BTW you had written ' to accommodate usage of Visual Studio 2010 "
which I read as mea
but did not sense much enthusiasm around it. There are some
other smaller and more straightforward fixes that we plan for upstreaming.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 29/04/14 10:25 , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/26/2014 07:45 AM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Azul is an OCA signee as a company and some employees are
Azul is an OCA signee as a company and some employees are individual
contributors as well.
I am a JDK6 committer and I work at Azul.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 24 Apr 2014, at 07:40, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 03:38 PM, Yuri Gaevsky wrote:
>>> Excellent! Are you an OpenJDK member
e wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My goal here was just to point out some of the issues/scope etc so that you
>> and the present openjdk6 maintainers can decide how to proceed.
>> BTW you had written ' to accommodate usage of Visual Studio 2010 "
>> which
might have
impact with regards to bug-to-bug compatibility with existing builds of
OpenJDK6 for Windows.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 10/02/2014 23:42, Phil Race wrote:
There was a lot of work to the build system and source code
to upgrade JDK7 to VS2010. Whilst a good chunk of that work was
in closed
is something openjdk6 community is interested in I could contribute a
patch.
I am also unfamiliar with the logistics here: seems that not all changes in
OpenJdk6 have corresponding bug entries in OpenJDK bug database. Should RFR be
simply sent to this list?
Thanks,
Ivan
36 matches
Mail list logo
