On 05/02/2014 07:42 AM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
> We are working on the schedule of patches. One of the ideas is that we
> have switched internaly to VS2010 toolchain. That did come with a cost
> of some awt code being taken form the 7th train and also the cost of
> braking VS2003 compatibility. I ra
We are working on the schedule of patches. One of the ideas is that we
have switched internaly to VS2010 toolchain. That did come with a cost
of some awt code being taken form the 7th train and also the cost of
braking VS2003 compatibility. I raised this topic on this list a little
while ago bu
On 04/26/2014 07:45 AM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
> Azul is an OCA signee as a company and some employees are individual
> contributors as well.
> I am a JDK6 committer and I work at Azul.
So, should we be expecting patches soon?
Andrew.
Azul is an OCA signee as a company and some employees are individual
contributors as well.
I am a JDK6 committer and I work at Azul.
Thanks,
Ivan
On 24 Apr 2014, at 07:40, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 03:38 PM, Yuri Gaevsky wrote:
>>> Excellent! Are you an OpenJDK member?
>>
>> I'm
On 04/24/2014 04:11 PM, Yuri Gaevsky wrote:
> I need to re-check, but that shouldn't be an issue since some our engineers
> already have OpenJDK member status (including JDK 6 Project).
That's fine, then. Any OpenJDK 6 member is welcome to submit patches
that fix the Windows build. It would be
Kasko; Andrew Hughes
Cc: Omair Majid; jdk6-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK6 B31 Now Available
On 04/24/2014 03:38 PM, Yuri Gaevsky wrote:
>> Excellent! Are you an OpenJDK member?
>
> I'm not (yet).
OK, so that's the hoop you'll have to jump through first. I
On 04/24/2014 03:38 PM, Yuri Gaevsky wrote:
>> Excellent! Are you an OpenJDK member?
>
> I'm not (yet).
OK, so that's the hoop you'll have to jump through first. I suspect
that Azul has signed the OCA on behalf of all employees?
Andrew.
> Excellent! Are you an OpenJDK member?
I'm not (yet).
-Yuri
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Haley [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:02 PM
To: Yuri Gaevsky; Alex Kasko; Andrew Hughes
Cc: Omair Majid; jdk6-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK6
Hi,
On 04/24/2014 09:51 AM, Yuri Gaevsky wrote:
>
>> We need an active Windows maintainer for OpenJDK 6. Unless someone
>> steps up to do this, Windows support will rot.
>
> We are ready to maintain Windows builds for OpenJDK 6.
Excellent! Are you an OpenJDK member?
Andrew.
Behalf Of Andrew
Haley
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:52 AM
To: Alex Kasko; Andrew Hughes
Cc: Omair Majid; jdk6-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK6 B31 Now Available
Hi,
On 04/23/2014 08:28 PM, Alex Kasko wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 03:55 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>
Hi,
On 04/23/2014 08:28 PM, Alex Kasko wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 03:55 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> The OpenJDK6-b31 build should succeed without the recent AWT-related
>>> changesets:
>>>
>>>[...]
>
> I actually ended up with the similar exclusion list after some
> unsuccessful attempts o
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> On 04/22/2014 03:55 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> The OpenJDK6-b31 build should succeed without the recent AWT-related
> >> changesets:
> >>
> >>[...]
>
> I actually ended up with the similar exclusion li
Hi,
On 04/22/2014 03:55 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Hello.
The OpenJDK6-b31 build should succeed without the recent AWT-related
changesets:
[...]
I actually ended up with the similar exclusion list after some
unsuccessful attempts of backporting.
I was able t
- Original Message -
> Hello.
>
> The OpenJDK6-b31 build should succeed without the recent AWT-related
> changesets:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/a4582ea36611
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/90adf1242c1f
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/r
[mailto:jdk6-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Omair
Majid
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 6:07 PM
To: Alex Kasko
Cc: jdk6-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK6 B31 Now Available
* Alex Kasko [2014-04-19 14:26]:
> I noticed changes in AWT code and some of them seem like
> Windows-only
* Alex Kasko [2014-04-19 14:26]:
> I noticed changes in AWT code and some of them seem like
> Windows-only. What is the reasoning behind porting Windows changes
> like these ones [1, 2] ? As I understand, windows changes themselves
> kind of unintended. Maybe they contain changes to shared code th
Hi,
On 04/16/2014 06:46 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
The OpenJDK6 b31 source release is now available for download:
https://java.net/projects/openjdk6/downloads/download/openjdk-6-src-b31-15_apr_2014.tar.gz
sha256sum: ef5dfda9649dc5a6a923eda34389006df0d8f8158351d89730307a70897e1229
Or:
https:/
Hi,
The OpenJDK6 b31 source release is now available for download:
https://java.net/projects/openjdk6/downloads/download/openjdk-6-src-b31-15_apr_2014.tar.gz
sha256sum: ef5dfda9649dc5a6a923eda34389006df0d8f8158351d89730307a70897e1229
Or:
https://java.net/projects/openjdk6/downloads/download/ope
18 matches
Mail list logo
