On 26/11/14 21:49, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> As it's basically removing a no-op, this shouldn't actually change
> anything much, but will make other planned backports easier and
> perhaps help performance very slightly in removing some completely
> unnecessary method calls.
Ah, thanks. I was thinkin
- Original Message -
> On 26/11/14 21:49, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > As it's basically removing a no-op, this shouldn't actually change
> > anything much, but will make other planned backports easier and
> > perhaps help performance very slightly in removing some completely
> > unnecessary me
