Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-11 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I assembled webrevs for merging the ppc port from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ppc-aix-port/jdk7u/hotspot/ into the main jdk7u repository: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/ppc-port/tree1/ There are no changes to jaxp (besides to the .hgtags file) so I skipped that repo. Please have a loo

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-11 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com] > Sent: Montag, 11. Juli 2016 16:02 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev > > > > - Original Message - &g

RFR(XS): 8161262: Fix jdk build with gcc 4.1.2: -fno-strict-overflow not known.

2016-07-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, we are building the jdk7u ppc port on gcc 4.1.2. This fails since "8147466: Add -fno-strict-overflow to IndicRearrangementProcessor{,2}.cpp" as the gcc flag introduced there is not known to gcc 4.1.2. I just guard it by the compiler version. Please review this change. http://cr.openjdk.java.

RE: RFR(XS): 8161262: Fix jdk build with gcc 4.1.2: -fno-strict-overflow not known.

2016-07-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
:a...@redhat.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2016 11:00 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; jdk7u- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8161262: Fix jdk build with gcc 4.1.2: -fno-strict- > overflow not known. > > On 13/07/16 09:53, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > we are buil

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, so I open a bug "PPC/AIX port for jdk7u" and description "This change contains all changes for the ppc port from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u" and just patch in all the diffs? If I do this this week, is there a chance I can push this by 28.7.? I'm on leave after that for 3 weeks. Best regards, Goetz

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
s, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Haley [mailto:a...@redhat.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 14:14 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Andrew Hughes > > Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev > > On 21/07/16 11:20, Li

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
rom: Andrew Haley [mailto:a...@redhat.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 15:31 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Andrew Hughes > > Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev > > On 21/07/16 14:29, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > it's the

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
> import a broken port with a ton of patches on top. Hmm, I would not consider the original port broken, it's what we used productive for several years before. Sure the code that exists now has some issues fixed (7 I think), but that's only the normal continuous bugfixing you have in any product

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
pull subsequent patches without pulling the changes below. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Haley [mailto:a...@redhat.com] > Sent: Freitag, 22. Juli 2016 11:00 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Andrew Hughes > > Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subjec

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Is there a way to mark the bugs fixed in Jira by hand? Would that help? Best regards, Goetz > -Original Message- > From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf > Of Lindenmaier, Goetz > Sent: Freitag, 22. Juli 2016 11:11 > To: Andrew Haley

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
used. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com] > Sent: Freitag, 22. Juli 2016 14:57 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: Andrew Haley ; jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev > > - Original

RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

2016-07-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
g from the preceding > changeset, > but I'll check. All before that is mere porting changes, some without bugIDs. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 6:14 PM > To: Lindenmaier,

RE: Merge AIX/PPC64 Port

2016-10-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 8:20 PM > To: jdk7u-dev > Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Subject: [RFR] [PATCH] Merge AIX/PPC64 Port > > As discussed previously [0], this is the proposed merge o

RE: Merge AIX/PPC64 Port

2016-10-25 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
It's in there, great!!! Thanks a lot for the merging efforts! I'm fixing our tests to use the main jdk7u repo now. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Omair Majid [mailto:oma...@redhat.com] > Sent: Montag, 24. Oktober 2016 18:19 > To: Andrew Hug

RE: [PATCH] jdk7u121-b00 retro-active security patch review

2017-01-10 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, if this is what's on jdk7u/jdk7u it looks good to me. We tested this fine on linuxppc64 and aixppc64. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of > Andrew Hughes > Sent: Dienstag, 10. Januar 2017 23:28 > To: j

Make jdk7u-dev read-only

2017-02-15 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi The repository jdk7u-dev seems to be unused. It did not receive a change since 2015/1/21. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/ Should it be made read only? Best regards, Goetz.

RFR: [jdk7u] 8028471: PPC64 (part 215): opto: Extend ImplicitNullCheck optimization.

2017-02-15 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi I would like to downport 8028471 from jdk8 to jdk7. Major parts of this change came with bulk checkin "8165807: PPC64: Backport PPC64 port to OpenJDK 7" This contains some edits we did during review of 8028471 when we moved the change from

RE: RFR: [jdk7u] 8028471: PPC64 (part 215): opto: Extend ImplicitNullCheck optimization.

2017-02-16 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ebruar 2017 12:22 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; jdk7u-dev d...@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: RFR: [jdk7u] 8028471: PPC64 (part 215): opto: Extend > ImplicitNullCheck optimization. > > Hi, > > this improves things, but the build now breaks in NetworkInterface.c: >

RE: RFR: [jdk7u] 8028471: PPC64 (part 215): opto: Extend ImplicitNullCheck optimization.

2017-02-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Andrew, thanks for the review! Can I push this by myself? I'll wait for after the security update ... Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com] > Sent: Freitag, 17. Februar 2017 09:02 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz

RFR(S): 8175087: [bsd] Fix build after "8024900: PPC64: Enable new build on AIX (jdk part)"

2017-02-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Please review this tiny fix. There is a BSD specific section of this code so the code guarded by the #if I fixed may not be compiled on bsd. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8175087-macErr/webrev.01/ Best regards, Goetz.

RFR(S): 8175163: [bsd] Fix build after "8005629: javac warnings compiling java.awt.EventDispatchThread..."

2017-02-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi 8005629 removed file EventDispatchAccess.java, but did not remove it from the list of exported files in FILES_export_macosx.gmk. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8175163-macErr3/webrev.01/ Please review this change. @Florian: With the three changes I now posted I could build on mac. B

RE: jdk7u131-b00 retro-active security patch review

2017-02-19 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I did a build on AIX and ran some tests. Also I looked through a large part of the webrev, which looks good. So I'm fine with this change. Best regards, Goetz > -Original Message- > From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of > Andrew Hughes > Sent:

RE: Make jdk7u-dev read-only

2017-02-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ey > Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 11:10 > To: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Make jdk7u-dev read-only > > On 16/02/17 07:39, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > > The repository jdk7u-dev seems to be unused. It did not receive a > > change since 2015/1/21. >

[ping] RE: RFR(S): 8175087: [bsd] Fix build after "8024900: PPC64: Enable new build on AIX (jdk part)"

2017-02-28 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I updated the webrev to be based on u131. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8175087-macErr/webrev.01/ Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Sent: Freitag, 17. Februar 2017 10:42 > To: jdk7u-dev > Cc: 'Florian Bruckner

[ping] RFR(S): 8175163: [bsd] Fix build after "8005629: javac warnings compiling java.awt.EventDispatchThread..."

2017-02-28 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8175163-macErr3/webrev.01/ I also updated this tob e based on u131. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Sent: Freitag, 17. Februar 2017 10:44 > To: jdk7u-dev > Cc: 'Florian Bruckner (3kra

RE: [ping] RE: RFR(S): 8175087: [bsd] Fix build after "8024900: PPC64: Enable new build on AIX (jdk part)"

2017-03-06 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks Andrew! Best regards, Goetz > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 7. März 2017 05:57 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: jdk7u-dev > Subject: Re: [ping] RE: RFR(S): 8175087: [bsd] Fix build after "8024900:

RE: [ping] RFR(S): 8175163: [bsd] Fix build after "8005629: javac warnings compiling java.awt.EventDispatchThread..."

2017-03-06 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks Andrew! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 7. März 2017 05:58 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: jdk7u-dev > Subject: Re: [ping] RFR(S): 8175163: [bsd] Fix build after "80

RE: [PATCH] jdk7u151-b01 retro-active security patch review

2017-08-11 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, the ppc part looks good. Thanks for adapting the ad rules to the port in 7. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of > Andrew Hughes > Sent: Freitag, 11. August 2017 03:15 > To: jdk7u-dev > Subject: Re:

RE: New OpenJDK 7 Committer: Andrew Dinn

2018-09-12 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
vote: yes Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: jdk7u-dev On Behalf Of > Andrew Hughes > Sent: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 05:31 > To: jdk7u-dev > Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 7 Committer: Andrew Dinn > > I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) [0] to OpenJDK 7 Committer. >

RE: New OpenJDK 7 Reviewer: Mario Torre

2018-09-12 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
vote: yest Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: jdk7u-dev On Behalf Of > Andrew Hughes > Sent: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 05:20 > To: jdk7u-dev > Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 7 Reviewer: Mario Torre > > I hereby nominate Mario Torre for the role of OpenJDK 7 Reviewer. >