From: Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a question what kind of JDK 1.3 compatibility do we want to
support?
I see that JDO plans to support JDK 1.3 from the wiki, but I was
wondering why? Given the end of service dates for the various 1.3 VMs I
was thinking that Derby 10.1 could be
Hi Dan,On Jul 21, 2005, at 2:18 AM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:From: Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a question what kind of JDK 1.3 compatibility do we want tosupport? I see that JDO plans to support JDK 1.3 from the wiki, but I waswondering why? Given the end of service dates for
Hi Erik,On Jul 21, 2005, at 2:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Ok. I thought that you would agree that this is a bug in JPOX, since the "obvious default" for a char column is CHAR. It is not that obvious when you have to support a wide range of databases and data types. The most obvious choice to
I'm not aware of any database that doesn't support CHAR column type.
And I think that having a default of jdbc-type = CHAR for a char
field is very reasonable. If I put this into the specification, I
assume you would be ok with it?
I would be very ok, if you show me how to store a char
Hi,
We will have our regular meeting Friday, July 22 at 9 am PST to discuss
JDO TCK issues and status.
Dial-in numbers are:
866 230-6968 294-0479#
International: +1 865 544-7856
Agenda:
Metadata Tests (Michelle, Michael)
Character truncation issue status (Michael, Craig)
JPOX
Hi Erik,On Jul 21, 2005, at 2:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:See inlineErik Bengtson-Original Message-From: Craig Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 12:26 AMTo: jdo-dev@db.apache.orgSubject: Re: Binding a char to PreparedStatement I was thinking that most of
This is simply an attempt to use the name attribute of the foreign-key
element in the metadata, as specified on the XML Metadata Test Coverage
wiki page http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/Chapter18TestComponents. It's
probably not very useful right now because we are not testing schema
generation.
Hi Michelle,It makes sense now. I was confused because it doesn't actually test anything yet, except that the foreign-key element is parsed by the xml parser.We will discuss it tomorrow.Thanks,CraigOn Jul 21, 2005, at 9:13 PM, Michelle Caisse wrote:This is simply an attempt to use the name
