[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780029#comment-17780029
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-822 at 11/1/23 7:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780029#comment-17780029
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-822:
FYI, DataNucleus GitHub master (unreleased)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17558863#comment-17558863
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-812:
FWIW DataNucleus v6.0 moved to supporting Jav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-809.
Assignee: Andy Jefferson
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by commit
https://github.com/apache/db-jdo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17515741#comment-17515741
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-809:
See GitHub pull request #42
> Mapping i
Andy Jefferson created JDO-809:
--
Summary: Mapping info for ArrayListCollections/TreeSetCollections
doesn't correctly map embedded element fields
Key: JDO-809
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JD
> Upon inspection of the TCK orm.xml files I find the embedded fields such as
> TreeSetCollections.TreeSetOfObject1 are supposed to be embedded in a join
> table, yet have no block, though they do for the other java.util
> type tests.
FWIW The same comment applies to the ORM files for ArrayList (
> 2. JDK 18 General Availability, and oracle-actions/setup-java see email
Not that it directly impacts on Apache JDO building, but DataNucleus v6.0
currently works for JDKs 8 through 17. This range is limited by the internal
repackaged version of the ASM bytecode library used (currently using v9
Hi,
after reworking some DN code and rerunning the TCK I came across a situation
where TestTreeSetCollections was failing (for app id), yet
TestHashSetCollections/TestSetCollections were passing (which was strange
considering the innocuous change I've been making). That, on its own, doesn't
sa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513216#comment-17513216
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-806:
Just a question why we (currently) have XSD X
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17512445#comment-17512445
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-806:
Missing jdoconfig.xsd, jdoconfig.dtd ?
&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17510346#comment-17510346
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-807:
DataNucleus always uses a local copy when we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17509989#comment-17509989
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-807:
Doesn't
[JDO-806|https://issues.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17491428#comment-17491428
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-806:
+1 on using an Apache URL; Jakarta specs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17479185#comment-17479185
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-744:
Can we make sure that this is done for the
> 1. Log4j issue CVE-2021-44228 JDO-800 "Update Log4j Version"
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-800
> TCK pom has been updated to log4j 2.16.0.
> What are the DataNucleus versions that we should use that have been or will
> be updated with the latest log4j releases?
The exact same on
> Please vote on the JDO 3.2 release (based on RC5). Voting will be open
> until Monday, October 6th.
+1
No issues found from my perspective. Presumed you mean December 6th.
Regards
--
Andy
DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus)
> 1. JDO 3.2 release RC4
> The release includes DataNucleus reference in the pom: core 5.2.7;
> rdbms 5.2.7; api-jdo 5.2.7; jdo-query 5.0.9; api-jpa 5.2.6.
> Are these the right DataNucleus versions for the 3.2 release?
> We probably should remove the datanucleus api-jdo and instead use the
> of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17413017#comment-17413017
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-796:
FYI, DataNucleus has some (largely contrib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson closed JDO-782.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Nothing to do with the Apache JDO project
> Initially deferred constraint should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson closed JDO-781.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Nothing to do with the Apache JDO project
> ForeignKey constructor should be cal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17360014#comment-17360014
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-709:
Good. Ignore the last comment on attributeName
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17359994#comment-17359994
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-709 at 6/9/21, 11:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17359994#comment-17359994
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-709:
The other use of the "attributeName&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17359853#comment-17359853
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-709:
[~clr] Yes, the "attributeName" wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17352661#comment-17352661
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-794:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/datanuc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17341813#comment-17341813
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-709:
A "converted class" doesn't tr
> If we do rename I see the following steps:
> - Rename master to main in both repositories gitbox and github. Most
> probably this involves infra.
> - Adapt some scripts and our documentation (WebSite, READMEs, ...)
> - Change our workspaces as described in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17080357#comment-17080357
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-779:
Well done on getting the web site migration g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16835545#comment-16835545
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-779 at 5/9/19 6:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16835545#comment-16835545
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-779 at 5/8/19 5:0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16835545#comment-16835545
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-779:
FWIW DataNucleus uses Asciidoc / Asciidocto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16793391#comment-16793391
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-778:
No objections to these methods. If wanting t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788992#comment-16788992
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-652 at 3/10/19 6:0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788992#comment-16788992
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
If you get problems then you need to look in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16786479#comment-16786479
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
See https://github.com/datanucleus/datanucleus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16783610#comment-16783610
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-770:
The GitHub commit messages now seem to go to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16783083#comment-16783083
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-770:
Why is the website not on GitHub under a si
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16774404#comment-16774404
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-770:
Comments :
* I don't seem to have comm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16676364#comment-16676364
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-652 at 11/6/18 8:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16676364#comment-16676364
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
The problem with that remaining test is simply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16675280#comment-16675280
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-652 at 11/5/18 6:3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16675280#comment-16675280
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-652 at 11/5/18 4:0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16675280#comment-16675280
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
DataNucleus has supported latest API changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16651415#comment-16651415
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
FYI, DataNucleus also now supports method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16639607#comment-16639607
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
If adding generics to the retu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16613253#comment-16613253
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
I've updated the DN prototype to matc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16610265#comment-16610265
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-652 at 9/11/18 8:2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16610265#comment-16610265
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
As I hinted at, you specified Double so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16608775#comment-16608775
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
And how is the Java API to know about &qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16605781#comment-16605781
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
See
[https://github.com/datanucleus/javax
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16601154#comment-16601154
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-652 at 9/2/18 12:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16601154#comment-16601154
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
Re: mail to jdo-dev mailing list (which I d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16559995#comment-16559995
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
In case you were expecting some DataNuc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16548828#comment-16548828
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
About StringExpression.add(String); yes, ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547654#comment-16547654
]
Andy Jefferson edited comment on JDO-652 at 7/18/18 10:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547654#comment-16547654
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
Tried to upload a patch since cannot ac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16544892#comment-16544892
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-770:
The sooner this can be done the better for al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16542799#comment-16542799
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
FYI
JDOQL "JDOHelper.getObjec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16499850#comment-16499850
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-774:
In case its of any use, DataNucleus manag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16316400#comment-16316400
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-771:
The only other thing I'd add is that when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16304461#comment-16304461
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-771:
The aforementioned system property is not se
Andy Jefferson created JDO-771:
--
Summary: Update requirement of ConnectionDriverName since JDBC 4
changed requirements
Key: JDO-771
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-771
Project: JDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16274126#comment-16274126
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-767:
Simple viewing of
https://svn.apache.org/viewv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16272251#comment-16272251
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-767:
Linux 64-bit (kernel 4.9.56), OpenJDK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16262323#comment-16262323
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-767:
JDO TCK (SVN trunk) passes for me, and always
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16187457#comment-16187457
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-745:
Does Apache Derby now support some bit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16108464#comment-16108464
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-764:
Firstly, the only reason you can get duplic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16103024#comment-16103024
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-764:
Why does the patch result in things like
> I updated the pom.xml to 5.1.1-SNAPSHOT and the enhancer step worked but
> many tck tests fail. [1]
I'd suggest that is down to whatever is different in your TCK from the SVN
trunk TCK ... because SVN trunk works fine with current DN code, and the only
change in my fix is ignoring classes that
Hi Craig,
> It looks like the DN enhancer recognizes the annotation as a
> persistence-capable class because it is annotated with PersistenceCapable
> but doesn't recognize it as an annotation that should not be enhanced.
Quite probably. I've only been enhancing through a persistence.xml file
re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson updated JDO-764:
---
Description:
By default annotations are used directly in a persistable class. Java
additionally allows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16032931#comment-16032931
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-764:
API updated with the patch. Spec updated to mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson updated JDO-764:
---
Attachment: JDO-764.patch
Patch providing the extra annotation config to allow use as meta-annotations
Andy Jefferson created JDO-764:
--
Summary: Allow JDO annotations to be used in meta-annotations
Key: JDO-764
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-764
Project: JDO
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-763:
--
Assignee: (was: Andy Jefferson)
> RI does not implement default of Query.setRes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15999709#comment-15999709
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-763:
Not sure why this is assigned to me.
If the i
In DataStoreCache there are methods to pin and unpin objects in the cache.
When using this as an interface to the standard "javax.cache", there is no
feature to "pin" objects as such, and so DataNucleus does not implement these
methods. They simply throw UnsupportedOperationException.
The ques
> 1. New JIRA JDO-757 "Add @Repeatable to all annotations which can be
> repeated" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-757
>
> Looks like we are almost done here. No need to deprecate existing “repeatable
> container” annotations. If any user really wants to use them, fine.
Well there wou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson closed JDO-757.
--
Resolution: Fixed
test applied to SVN
> Add @Repeatable to all annotations which can be repea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson updated JDO-757:
---
Attachment: jdo-757-test.patch
Attached is a test for use of @Repeatable marked annotations, to check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-757:
--
Assignee: Andy Jefferson
> Add @Repeatable to all annotations which can be repea
Andy Jefferson created JDO-757:
--
Summary: Add @Repeatable to all annotations which can be repeated
Key: JDO-757
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-757
Project: JDO
Issue Type
> In the first of Tilmanns examples he did "(...).isEmpty()", which you could
> get the equivalent of with "== null" I'd guess (without trying it).
Actually I doubt "== null" would suffice, but DataNucleus does support use of
EXISTS(subquery) internally for JPA support, so I just added basic sup
> Tilmann reports that subqueries that return collections don’t seem to work.
> The only subqueries that are tested in the tck return aggregates (AVG, MAX,
> MIN, etc).
> So should we change the specification to require that subqueries must return
> single values?
No, Tilmann actually reported
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15462940#comment-15462940
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-756:
> In Customer and Supplier classes: the id
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15429359#comment-15429359
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-735:
Perhaps Extent should also be AutoClose
> Can you give a specific example where INNER JOIN would give the wrong answer?
There are likely many examples over the 8 years that this query generation
mechanism has been in place; all defaults have been set based on what was
needed to get a reliable mechanism for the vast majority of queries
> 3. Experiments with queries and multiple navigations
>
> Looks like there is a bug in datanucleus when translating JDOQL to SQL by
> using LEFT OUTER JOIN semantics when navigating a relationship.
>
> @Andy: is there a bug? Clearly, LEFT OUTER JOIN is needed when loading
> objects with a fetc
Hi Tilmann,
> (sorry for double posting, I sent this to an...@apache.org before)
I haven't used the Apache email for years since Apache gets loads of spam; I'd
guess it goes to /dev/null on my ISP :-)
> I started looking into adapting datanucleus for JDO JIRA 747:
> https://issues.apache.org/j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15346784#comment-15346784
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-751:
1. I said DN equates a transient to null (not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15339802#comment-15339802
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-751:
1. You use "this.optionalPC.orElse(oth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15337814#comment-15337814
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-751:
Comments from cursory scan of the patch
1. You
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Jefferson closed JDO-753.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 3 update 1 (3.0.1))
No idea what this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15315907#comment-15315907
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-753:
Hello,
care to share with us what relevance
Hi,
> a) SQLSyntaxErrorException : Encountered "NOT" at line 1, column 185
Just seen your SQL generated. "WHERE NOT NOT (A0.OPTIONAL_PC IS NULL)"
That is valid on some RDBMS but maybe Derby is throwing its toys out of the
pram due to it? Current DN code will put brackets in there. i.e NOT (NOT (
Hi,
> thanks. Indeed it seems that the error is triggered by declaring a field
> as 'Optional'.
That I doubt, due to established tests
https://github.com/datanucleus/tests/blob/master/jdo/general/src/test/org/datanucleus/tests/types/OptionalTest.java
More likely the problem is down to having a
Hi,
> -I have invented a new declarative method to update object databases and I
> would like to introduce that method you.
>
> My question is:
> Should the functionality of this method included in some future versions of
> JDO (and perhaps some other definitions/systems under Apache)?
> Also I a
> 3. JDO-750 "Change development environment to JDK 1.8"
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-750
>
> Not clear whether api or specification needs to call out specifically java 8.
> The tck will now run only on java 8.
You need the API to be built with Java8 since there are javax.jdo.que
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15222121#comment-15222121
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-747:
Perhaps the requester of this "feature&quo
1 - 100 of 1539 matches
Mail list logo
