lists.apache.org

The JDO project mail lists are currently available via lists.apache.org. Navigate to db.apache.org and go to the jdo-dev tab. Under the other lists tab you will find jdo-commits and jdo-user. Craig L Russell Architect craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday August 5, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. Experiments with queries and multiple navigations It looks like the TCK does not test navigation and null values very much, and the reference implementation does not implement the specification where navigation through

Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday July 29, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Hi Andy, > On Jul 29, 2016, at 11:53 PM, Andy Jefferson wrote: > >> 3. Experiments with queries and multiple navigations >> >> Looks like there is a bug in datanucleus when translating JDOQL to SQL by >> using LEFT OUTER JOIN semantics when navigating a relationship. >>

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday July 29, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. New patch on JDO-751 "Support for Java8 Optional" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751 Waiting on experiments with queries. See #3 below. 2. JDO-747 "Behavior of delete() with multiple concurre

Re: SQL for navigation through null values

Last week we discussed navigating through references and specifically the following: SELECT this from Employee where manager.manager == null This translates to: SELECT DISTINCT A0.BIRTHDATE,A0.FIRSTNAME,A0.LASTNAME,A0.PERSONID,A0.HIREDATE,A0.WEEKLYHOURS,A0.DISCRIMINATOR FROM

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Thursday July 14, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell ANNOUNCEMENT: Congratulations to Tilmann who was offered, and has accepted the committer role in the JDO project. Agenda: 1. New patch on JDO-751 "Support for Java8 Optional" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751 2. JDO-747

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday July 8, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell NOTE: We have a new video conference. Please disregard the previous one. Next meeting will take place on Thursday June 15 at 9:00 PDT. Agenda: 1. New patch on JDO-751 "Support for Java8 Optional" https://issues.apache.org/j

JDO group?

The JDO group seems to have disappeared. I’ll set up the Oracle toll-free conference number now… Craig L Russell Architect craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Thursday June 23, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell NOTE: Next meeting will be on July 8 at 9:00 PDT Agenda: 1. New comments on JDO-751 "Support for Java8 Optional" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751 a) comparing transient and persistent instances is

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday June 17, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell NOTE: Next week’s meeting will be on Thursday June 23 at 9:00 AM Pacific Agenda: 1. EMail "A new general method to update object databases / Should it be included in Java Data Objects, JDO?” There seems to be agreement that a ne

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday June 10, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. EMail "A new general method to update object databases / Should it be included in Java Data Objects, JDO ?” It’s not clear that a separate method is needed, even if garbage collection is seen to be useful. Discussio

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday May 27, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell NOTE: Next week’s meeting will be delayed by 30 minutes due to traffic. June 3, 2016 at 9:30 Pacific time Agenda: 1. EMail "A new general method to update object databases / Should it be included in Java Data Objects, JDO ?” L

Re: EmbeddedPCMapping cannot be cast to PersistableMapping

Hi Tilmann, > On May 30, 2016, at 6:10 AM, Tilmann Zäschke wrote: > > Dear all, > > I'm trying to implement the schema for the new Optional test, but I keep > running into a ClassCastException: > > javax.jdo.JDOFatalInternalException: Failed to generate new Mapping of type

Re: A new general method to update object databases / Should it be included in Java Data Objects, JDO ?

HI Heikki, > On May 20, 2016, at 10:55 AM, Hei Virk wrote: > > Hi everybody: > > I will comment later more. > > -I am just going to keep a presentation about the topic in my university > here in Finland for theorists and I am making those slides at a moment.. > > One

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday May 20, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. EMail "A new general method to update object databases / Should it be included in Java Data Objects, JDO ?” There are two aspects to this discussion: persistence by reachability; and garbage collection. There are no

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday May 6, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell NOTE: Next meeting will be two weeks from now. May 20, 9:00 AM PDT Agenda: 1. JDO-750 "Change development environment to JDK 1.8" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-750: anything left? 2. JDO-751 "Support for

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday April 22, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell NOTE: Next meeting is a day early: April 28 9:00 AM PDT Agenda: 1. JDO-750 "Change development environment to JDK 1.8" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-750 Since 3.2 needs Java8 we could put it into the specifi

Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday April 15, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

> On Apr 15, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: > >> 3. JDO-750 "Change development environment to JDK 1.8" >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-750 >> >> Not clear whether api or specification needs to call out specifically java >> 8. The tck will now run

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday April 1, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Attendees: Tilmann Zäschke, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log 2. JDO social media properties (see email from Matthew) 3. JDO-751 "Support for Java8 Optional" https://issues.apach

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday March 18, 10 AM Pacific Time (PDT)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell NOTE: No meeting next week due to public holiday. Next meeting April 1 (seriously) 9 AM PDT Agenda: 1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log 2. JDO social media properties (see email from

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday March 11, 9 AM Pacific Time (PST)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log 2. JDO social media properties (see email from Matthew) Does anyone think it’s useful to post e.g. Michael has new test cases for parameters

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday March 4, 9 AM Pacific Time (PST)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log 2. JDO social media properties (see email from Matthew) Greg Chase has generously volunteered to help manage the Twitter account. It looks like

JDO social media accounts

Hi Matthew, We will be happy to take the social media accounts under our collective wing. Can you send me a private message with the credentials? Anyone who wants to manage one or more accounts, please message the list and I’ll forward the credentials. Craig

JDO conference call dial-in information https://join.skype.com/RUHyGMHxNDyR

There is a new dial-in that you can use to join the discussion, if you have a Skype account. https://join.skype.com/RUHyGMHxNDyR This is a free video chat that we will use, which should be better than the previous dial-ins. The Oracle conference is short on toll-free numbers and is audio

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday February 12, 9 AM Pacific Time (PST)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell, Tilmann Zäschke On Feb 11, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Michael Bouschen <michael.bousc...@akquinet.de> wrote: Agenda: 1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log 2. JDO social media properties (see

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday February 5, 9 AM Pacific Time (PST)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log 2. JDO social media properties (see email from Matthew) Need volunteers to manage these accounts. If no volunteers, I will assign volunteers

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 29, 9 AM Pacific Time (PST)

Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log no change 2. Spec updates JDO-749 "Support for java.time types, and querying using associated methods&q

Toll-free numbers for JDO conference calls

pfa conference call numbers.

Sorry I'll have to miss today's meeting

Password ends in 13. Talk to you all next week.

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, July 15, 9 am Pacific Time

Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. Maven 2 upgrade https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-647 Issues with class loaders. The enhancer deals with three sets of resources: - the resources provided by maven before calling the exectck goals; this is the current context

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-630) Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-630. --- Resolution: Fixed The snapshot of DataNucleus 2.0.1 resolves this issue. Support specification

[jira] Updated: (JDO-558) Create tests for the serialization of PersistenceManagerFactory/PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-558: -- Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 maintenance release 3) Defer until next maintenance release. Create

[jira] Updated: (JDO-630) Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-630: -- Assignee: Andy Jefferson (was: Craig Russell) I've committed changes as a result of the review comments

[jira] Commented: (JDO-630) Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12804893#action_12804893 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-630: --- Missed the orm file in the previous commit. svn commit

[jira] Commented: (JDO-630) Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12804336#action_12804336 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-630: --- Review during conference call: comment regarding

[jira] Commented: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12799252#action_12799252 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-623: --- What's the maven incantation to get the current DN SVN

[jira] Commented: (JDO-630) Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12799259#action_12799259 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-630: --- The NPE is here: +/** */ +public void

[jira] Commented: (JDO-630) Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12799262#action_12799262 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-630: --- Just a couple of comments on the test case: This uses

[jira] Commented: (JDO-630) Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12799281#action_12799281 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-630: --- Not clear what you are looking for. The stack trace

[jira] Closed: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell closed JDO-623. - Resolution: Fixed The JDO trunk now passes on DataNucleus 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT. All that's left

[jira] Commented: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795894#action_12795894 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-623: --- Changes to remove the old query timeout test

[jira] Commented: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12792547#action_12792547 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-623: --- The latest patch has been checked in. svn commit -m

[jira] Updated: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-623: -- Attachment: (was: jdo623.patch) Query cancel and timeout support

[jira] Updated: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-623: -- Attachment: jdo623.patch Please review this patch. Comments from Michael have been incorporated. One

[jira] Updated: (JDO-619) API required for enabling/disabling FOR UPDATE locking for SELECTs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-619: -- Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 maintenance release 3) API required for enabling/disabling FOR UPDATE

[jira] Commented: (JDO-639) tck enhancement should make use of feature to enhance an entire directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769695#action_12769695 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-639: --- The variables jdo.tck.paclasses.sources

[jira] Commented: (JDO-644) Change JTA 1.1 dependency artifact id from transaction-api to jta

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769276#action_12769276 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-644: --- This change seems innocuous enough. I agree

[jira] Commented: (JDO-639) tck enhancement should make use of feature to enhance an entire directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769282#action_12769282 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-639: --- The patch makes the tck much more readable/usable

[jira] Commented: (JDO-641) javax.jdo.Enhancer fails to pass full path name for the file arguments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12766549#action_12766549 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-641: --- Can you verify that the test files exist. These files

[jira] Commented: (JDO-641) javax.jdo.Enhancer fails to pass full path name for the file arguments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12766079#action_12766079 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-641: --- Can you post the output of the failed test? The failure

[jira] Commented: (JDO-639) tck enhancement should make use of feature to enhance an entire directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760106#action_12760106 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-639: --- Assuming that Michelle's analysis is correct (without

[jira] Commented: (JDO-639) tck enhancement should make use of feature to enhance an entire directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757218#action_12757218 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-639: --- This seems to capture the essence of the issue. tck

[jira] Updated: (JDO-621) Add javax.jdo.JDOEnhancerMain to call the enhancer via standard API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-621: -- Attachment: (was: jdo-621.patch) Add javax.jdo.JDOEnhancerMain to call the enhancer via standard API

[jira] Updated: (JDO-621) Add javax.jdo.JDOEnhancerMain to call the enhancer via standard API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-621: -- Attachment: jdo-621.patch This fixes the problem noticed by Michael that the wrong path separator is used

[jira] Updated: (JDO-621) Add javax.jdo.JDOEnhancerMain to call the enhancer via standard API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-621: -- Attachment: (was: jdo-621.patch) Add javax.jdo.JDOEnhancerMain to call the enhancer via standard API

[jira] Commented: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12743237#action_12743237 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-623: --- Nice work as usual. Just one comment: there are TODO

[jira] Commented: (JDO-635) tck2 does not compile with JDK 1.5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12740630#action_12740630 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-635: --- Running MacOSX: java version 1.5.0_19 Java(TM) 2

[jira] Updated: (JDO-621) Add javax.jdo.JDOEnhancerMain to call the enhancer via standard API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-621: -- Attachment: jdo-621.patch Please review this patch. Most functionality of Enhancer is implemented

[jira] Commented: (JDO-637) JDOQL : Enhance the JDOQL with JOIN and ALIAS features

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12736129#action_12736129 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-637: --- +1 to what Andy says. Simple cases don't even need any

[jira] Commented: (JDO-621) Add javax.jdo.JDOEnhancerMain to call the enhancer via standard API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12732683#action_12732683 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-621: --- I'm also still not sold on the requirement to pass

[jira] Commented: (JDO-634) M2 build process doesn't put correct MANIFEST.MF in jar file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12724593#action_12724593 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-634: --- Might be that you just need a felix plugin to generate

[jira] Commented: (JDO-633) List.get(int) support in JDOQL is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12724602#action_12724602 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-633: --- Andy commented: A List has an order (whether

[jira] Commented: (JDO-633) List.get(int) support in JDOQL is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12724604#action_12724604 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-633: --- The specification update is trivial. The RI sounds

[jira] Closed: (JDO-500) Need better documentation for api2 jdoconfig.xml tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell closed JDO-500. - Resolution: Fixed Thanks to Richard for providing the patches for this issue. The test cases are now

[jira] Closed: (JDO-596) Provide maven 2 POM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell closed JDO-596. - Resolution: Fixed Provide maven 2 POM --- Key: JDO-596

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12721298#action_12721298 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- Of course we need TCK tests. I don't know what I

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12720819#action_12720819 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- Thanks for applying the patches. Are we ready to close

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12714511#action_12714511 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- Some names contained upper case Ds in the use of term

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712180#action_12712180 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- I suggest renaming ComponentMetadata to TypeMetadata

[jira] Commented: (JDO-596) Upgrade to maven 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12705447#action_12705447 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-596: --- In my workspace I have a pom.xml parallel to trunk

[jira] Commented: (JDO-596) Upgrade to maven 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12705465#action_12705465 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-596: --- In my workspace I have a pom.xml parallel to trunk

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-630) Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reassigned JDO-630: - Assignee: Craig Russell Support specification of exact class in SingleFieldIdentity

[jira] Updated: (JDO-596) Upgrade to maven 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-596: -- Attachment: jdo-596.patch Please review this patch. It adds a maven2 pom.xml to api2. Upgrade to maven

[jira] Updated: (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-607: -- Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 maintenance release 3) Defer to future release. Require no-args

[jira] Updated: (JDO-556) JDOHelper should use Java 6 ServiceLoader if available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-556: -- Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 maintenance release 3) Defer to future release. JDOHelper should use

[jira] Commented: (JDO-619) API required for enabling/disabling FOR UPDATE locking for SELECTs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702485#action_12702485 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-619: --- I took it as accepted that the methods were needed

[jira] Commented: (JDO-626) Update tck README: require maven version 1.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12690138#action_12690138 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-626: --- Looks good. Update tck README: require maven version

[jira] Commented: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12671967#action_12671967 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-623: --- Since Query.cancel() cannot be invoked from the thread

[jira] Commented: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12671492#action_12671492 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-623: --- This is a good addition to the spec. Most pmf

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656318#action_12656318 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- All setters should be changed to return the object

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656070#action_12656070 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- - FetchGroupMetadata: Boolean getPostLoad

[jira] Commented: (JDO-621) Add javax.jdo.JDOEnhancerMain to call the enhancer via standard API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656082#action_12656082 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-621: --- Whether it is called Enhancer or JDOEnhancerMain I

[jira] Commented: (JDO-619) API required for enabling/disabling FOR UPDATE locking for SELECTs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656085#action_12656085 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-619: --- One way is to specify this statically in the JDO

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12653493#action_12653493 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- Re: priority of user-defined metadata. Why not make

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12653523#action_12653523 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- Yet more random comments on patch 5: InterfaceMetadata

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12652840#action_12652840 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- If you create JDOMetaData via JDOHelper then how

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12652884#action_12652884 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- Maybe best to just skip the whole services thing

[jira] Commented: (JDO-591) Enhancer Invocation API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12652469#action_12652469 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-591: --- Nice work. Regarding the patch: 1

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12652505#action_12652505 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-615: --- Just some high level comments for right now. In order

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-614) Change the name of the currentVersion property to be more specific: jdo.currentVersion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-614. --- Resolution: Fixed svn commit api11/project.xml api2-legacy/project.xml api2/project.xml ... Sending

[jira] Commented: (JDO-612) M2 pom is incorrect, result in problems with transitive dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12647681#action_12647681 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-612: --- Hi Carlos, Thanks for that. Should fix our problem

[jira] Updated: (JDO-612) M2 pom is incorrect, result in problems with transitive dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-612: -- Attachment: jdo-612.patch Are there any other issues relating to the pom? M2 pom is incorrect, result

[jira] Commented: (JDO-612) M2 pom is incorrect, result in problems with transitive dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12647735#action_12647735 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-612: --- svn commit -m JDO-612 Add test scope to junit and ant

[jira] Created: (JDO-614) Change the name of the currentVersion property to be more specific: jdo.currentVersion

: JDO Issue Type: Improvement Components: api2, api2-legacy, enhancer2, model2, query2, runtime2, tck2, tck2-legacy, util2 Reporter: Craig Russell Assignee: Craig Russell Currently the version number is a maven variable set in project.properties and used

[jira] Updated: (JDO-614) Change the name of the currentVersion property to be more specific: jdo.currentVersion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-614: -- Attachment: jdo-614.patch Please review this patch. It updates the name of the property from

[jira] Commented: (JDO-611) GetObjectIdForPersistentInterface - Implementation Class / PICompany / ICompany Mess

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12645503#action_12645503 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-611: --- For easy reference, this is the test case method

[jira] Commented: (JDO-500) Need better documentation for api2 jdoconfig.xml tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12638619#action_12638619 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-500: --- This is a good start to documenting the jdoconfig tests

[jira] Commented: (JDO-500) Need better documentation for api2 jdoconfig.xml tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12637316#action_12637316 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-500: --- Yes, these are the classes that need a bit more

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-590. --- Resolution: Fixed The specification dated October 3 has the changes. Control over transaction

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-463) Clarify the behavior of an ordering column mapped to a user-visible field in the target class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-463. --- Resolution: Fixed The specification dated 12-Sep-2008 contains the update. Clarify the behavior

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >