Re: JSR-243 specification lead transition

Congratulations, Craig! :) On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > FYI. We have some work to do. > > Craig > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: Harold Ogle > > Subject: Re: JSR-243 specification lead transition > > Date:

Re: JDO social media accounts

I sent all info to Craig and haven't heard back from him yet. I'll leave all decisions WRT that stuff to him. -matthew On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Greg Chase wrote: > Hi guys, just following up. > > Did we transfer credentials as needed? Did you still want me to take

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 29, 9 AM Pacific Time (PST)

Please add to the agenda a discussion of who, if anyone, would like to take over the (fairly inactive) JDO social media properties. Here was my email to Craig, which may have fallen through the cracks: Hi Craig, As I haven't been participating hardly at all for some time now, I'd like to hand

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday November 15, 8:30 am Pacific Time

, Matthew Adams wrote: Yeah, noticed that after I sent the message...10:30 CT is better for me! :) On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, mcai...@sonic.net wrote: Hi Matthew, It's over. Please note the time change. Does the half-hour earlier start time affect your ability to attend

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday November 15, 8:30 am Pacific Time

Gnot sure I can make this one On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, November 15 at 8:30 am PacificTime (PST) to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Please note, from this week on we

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday November 15, 8:30 am Pacific Time

Yeah, noticed that after I sent the message...10:30 CT is better for me! :) On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, mcai...@sonic.net wrote: Hi Matthew, It's over. Please note the time change. Does the half-hour earlier start time affect your ability to attend? -- Michelle Gnot sure

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday November 8, 9 am Pacific Time

Sorry, won't be able to make this week's meeting either. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, November 8 at 9 am PacificTime (PST) to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: US

Re: Sorry I'll have to miss today's meeting

Sorry in arrears, me too. On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Craig Russell papa...@gmail.com wrote: Password ends in 13. Talk to you all next week. -- mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me matt...@matthewadams.me skype:matthewadams12 googletalk:matt...@matthewadams.me http://matthewadams.me

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday October, 9 am Pacific Time

I prolly can't make this one; conflicting meeting. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, October 4 at 9 am PacificTime (PT) to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: US Toll

Re: [VOTE] Please vote on JDO 3.1-rc1 release

+1 On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Michelle Caisse mcai...@sonic.net wrote: All, Please vote on the JDO 3.1-rc1 release. Voting will be open until Thursday, October 3. You may download the JDO 3.1-rc1 release artifacts from the staging repository:

[persistence]

*Note: copying the JDO developers alias.* I saw your posthttp://blog.osgi.org/2013/08/the-perfect-osgi-persistence-model.htmlon using persistence technologies, and would like to extend you an offer to attend the JDO expert group's weekly conference call to discuss the matter. Here are the

Re: OSGi interoperability

Thanks, Jorg. I have reached out to Peter to work with the JDO expert group on this. -matthew On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Jörg von Frantzius jfrantz...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, just FYI, Peter Kriens, one of the main advocats of OSGi, is looking for other people's experience with

Re: Deploying javax.jdo:jdo2-api:2.3-ec to maven central

Actually, see http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Cjavax.jdo%7Cjdo-api%7C3.0.1%7Cjarfor dependency groupIdjavax.jdo/groupId artifactIdjdo-api/artifactId version3.0.1/version /dependency is the latest, likely compatible, but I don't see why a retroactive release of the last

Re: Deploying javax.jdo:jdo2-api:2.3-ec to maven central

, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: Hi Matthew, On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: Actually, see http://search.maven.org/#**artifactdetails%7Cjavax.jdo%** 7Cjdo-api%7C3.0.1%7Cjarforhttp://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Cjavax.jdo%7Cjdo-api

Re: Deploying javax.jdo:jdo2-api:2.3-ec to maven central

is for an artifact that the jdo project did not have anything to do with. There are already artifacts on maven central that should be of use. Craig On Feb 22, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Matthew Adams wrote: I was saying that I don't see a problem with uploading jdo2-api to Maven Central. Who released

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 25, 9 am Pacific Time

Sorry, couldn't make. No status change. On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, January 25 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: US Toll free: 866

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 18, 9 am Pacific Time

Sorry, can't attend. No changes from me yet on JDO-717. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, January 18 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: US Toll

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday Dezember 7, 9 am Pacific Time

I can't make meeting either. 9-5 mtg today. I still intend to do this work, just been busy. On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, I'm not able to make the meeting today. Status: Provided patch for JDO-717 (see agenda item 2). This is an

Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday November 23, 9 am Pacific Time

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:40 AM, mcai...@sonic.net wrote: Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Michelle Caisse 1. Issue with running individual configurations Error finding parent POM when running an individual configuration from the TCK directory. Resolved by running maven clean install from the

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday November 2, 9 am Pacific Time

Can't make meeting today, stuck in another one. No change on JDO-717. On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, November 2 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are:

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, August 31, 9 am Pacific Time

Sorry, guys, prolly can't make meeting today. No change on my assigned issues. For the Other Items business, though, Apache Isis recently committed a change to support JDO: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-14 Yours truly was the reporter of that issue. Yay! On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at

Re: Fwd: Apache JDO site : problem with upload

it once ever. -matthew On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Andy Jefferson a...@datanucleus.orgwrote: On Tuesday 31 Jul 2012 09:46:28 Matthew Adams wrote: Hi infrastructure team, I just saw this (below) from Andy Jefferson. I tried to look at the file he says has permissions problems (/x1

Fwd: Apache JDO site : problem with upload

Hi infrastructure team, I just saw this (below) from Andy Jefferson. I tried to look at the file he says has permissions problems (/x1/www/ db.apache.org/jdo/images/logos/.svn/props), but it doesn't exist. Further, I don't recall ever doing anything that would result in the permissions being as

JDO social links

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JavaDataObjects Twitter: @JavaDataObjects Google+: https://plus.google.com/s/javadataobjects -- mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me matt...@matthewadams.me skype:matthewadams12 googletalk:matt...@matthewadams.me http://matthewadams.me

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, July 6, 9 am Pacific Time

Can't make meeting today...out of town. Sorry. No change in status. On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, July 6 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are:

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, June 22, 9 am Pacific Time

Sorry, can't make this one due to a conflict. No changes to report. On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, June 22 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are:

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 25, 9 am Pacific Time

Sorry, no change on my items. Can't attend due to meeting time conflict for the next few weeks. -matthew On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, May 25 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 11, 9 am Pacific Time

Can't make this one again. Status: * JDO-694: Automate OSGi bundling in JDO 3.1+ build Pretty much done * JDO-707: Refactor JDO parent child poms: Pretty much done * JDO-651: Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores: No change * JDO-709: Standardize field/property converters: No

Re: org.datanucleus.exceptions.NucleusObjectNotFoundException: No such database row

Hi Rahul, This is the forum for development of the JDO API, specification TCK. You're asking a question about DataNucleus, a JDO implementation, which would be better asked on their forum: http://www.datanucleus.org/servlet/forum/index -matthew On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Rahul

Re: jDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Mar 9, 9 am Pacific Time

Can't make meeting today -- have conflict. Please review patch for pom refactoring! On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Michael Bouschen m...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, March 9 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers

Re: Build failure with JDO3.MF missing

Fixed: R:\os\jdo\trunk\tcksvn ci -m removed reference to ../JDO3.MF -- don't think it's necessary since we're not publishing the TCK (yet) to any Maven repos Sendingtck\pom.xml Transmitting file data . Committed revision 1296400. On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Craig L Russell

Fwd: Nexus: Staging Completed.

: Staging Completed. To: Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.me, cent...@sonatype.com *Description:* Close staging repository automatically for uploaded bundle. *Details:* The following artifacts have been staged to the Central Bundles-099 (u:matthewadams, a:173.172.125.31)https://oss.sonatype.org

Fwd: Nexus: Promotion Completed.

FYI, JDO 3.0.1 Maven artifacts promoted. Should be on Maven central soon. -- Forwarded message -- From: Nexus Repository Manager ne...@oss.sonatype.org Date: Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:07 AM Subject: Nexus: Promotion Completed. To: Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.me, cent

Re: Nexus: Staging Completed.

news. Are the instructions unclear on how to create signatures? Or is this something that maven 2 will do automagically? Thanks, Craig On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:11 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: I have successfully staged the JDO 3.0.1 artifact bundle to Maven central. See https

Fwd: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Feb 03, 9 am Pacific Time

Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, February 03 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: US Toll free: 866 682-4770 Germany Frankfurt 06916106 Germany Toll free: 08006648515 (Other countries by request) To place the call: 1.

Re: Problem uploading JDO 3.0.1 to Maven Central

, so the Nexus bundle validator couldn't find url, scm, developers, licenses, etc. I manually added them from the JDO parent pom and Nexus stopped complaining about those missing elements. All that's left is the signature verification errors. -matthew On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Matthew Adams

Re: Retire JDO Expert Group mail list

+1 On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: Hi, The JDO expert group mail list is being retired due to the transfer of assets from Sun to Oracle. Does anyone see a need to maintain a separate JDO expert group list? I'd prefer to have subscribers to

Problem uploading JDO 3.0.1 to Maven Central

I tried to manually update a JDO 3.0.1 bundle consisting of the api jar, pom, sources javadoc plus signatures thereof, but it didn't seem to work. See https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/MVNCENTRAL-160 -matthew -- @matthewadams12 mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me skype:matthewadams12

FYI: https://jira.springsource.org/browse/DATAJPA-134

I just entered this request in Spring Data JPA's JIRA. Support DataNucleus JPA https://jira.springsource.org/browse/DATAJPA-134 -matthew -- @matthewadams12 mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me skype:matthewadams12 yahoo:matthewadams aol:matthewadams12 google-talk:matthewadam...@gmail.com

FYI: updated property svn:ignore

FYI: I set the svn:ignore property to ignore eclipse- build-specific files. If you want to add ignored files, just edit trunk/.svnignore and then, from the trunk directory, issue the command svn propset svn:ignore -F .svnignore . --recursive $ svn ci -m executed 'svn propset svn:ignore -F

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.mewrote: Added committed releases/3.0.1 to SVN Command: Commit Adding: C:\OpenSource\jdo\releases\3.0.1 Adding: C:\OpenSource\jdo\releases\3.0.1\dist Adding: C:\OpenSource\jdo\releases\3.0.1\dist\db Adding: C:\OpenSource\jdo\releases\3.0.1\dist\db\jdo Adding: C

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

Ok, then. Craig, please advise as to what I need to do, if anything. On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Andy Jefferson a...@datanucleus.orgwrote: I just noticed that there is no jdo-api-3.0.1.jar or hashes in releases/3.0.1/dist/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/javax/jdo/jdo-api. Shouldn't they

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

/~madams/jdo3.0.1/dist 3.1, currenly in trunk, will depend exclusively on Maven2, but that's a work in progress. Any other advice you can give to help us deploy JDO 3.0.1? -matthew On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Phil Steitz pste...@apache.org wrote: On 11/16/11 11:50 AM, Matthew Adams wrote

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

, interim to our getting the maven2 release process organized? Or to tell Matthew Adams what needs to be done? Thanks, Craig On Nov 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 13/11/2011, at 1:15 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 11/13/11 1:59 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Matthew, I think

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

to publish to this repo? Thanks, Craig On Nov 13, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: Thanks.  Now the only error I get is the following.  Copying to the maven-1 location worked ok. madams@minotaur:~$ cp -r public_html/jdo3.0.1/dist/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/* /www/people.apache.org/repo

FYI: Spring Data support for JDO

https://jira.springsource.org/browse/DATACMNS-96 Thought you might like to know. The more votes watchers on the issue, the more likely it'll be done. -matthew -- @matthewadams12 mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me skype:matthewadams12 yahoo:matthewadams aol:matthewadams12

Re: FYI: Spring Data support for JDO

AM, Matthew Adams wrote: https://jira.springsource.org/**browse/DATACMNS-96https://jira.springsource.org/browse/DATACMNS-96 Thought you might like to know. The more votes watchers on the issue, the more likely it'll be done. -matthew -- @matthewadams12 mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me

[VOTE] [RESULTS] JDO 3.0.1 release

This vote has succeeded. Voting +1: Craig L Russell (binding) Andy Jefferson (binding) Michael Bouschen (binding) Matthew Adams Voting -1 or 0: none

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

@ on this. Infrastructure or Craig, can you please tell me what I need to do to request permission to copy release artifacts? Thanks, Matthew On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.me wrote: Sent announcement to test the release. On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Matthew

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.me wrote: Attempted to copy artifacts for release got errors. madams@minotaur:~$ cp -r public_html/jdo3.0.1/dist/db /www/www.apache.org/dist cp: /www/www.apache.org/dist/db/jdo/3.0.1: Permission denied madams@minotaur:~$ cp -r

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

/javax/jdo/jdo-api: Permission denied On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Matthew, I gave you db group access. Try again, please. Craig On Nov 13, 2011, at 6:02 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: Attempted to copy artifacts for release got errors

Re: Updating KEYS

Done. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: Oops, I mean http://www.apache.org/dist/db/jdo/KEYS Craig On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Matthew, Here is the file that you need to add your public key to:

Re: [VOTE] JDO 3.0.1 release

+1 On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.mewrote: We have prepared the release artifacts for JDO 3.0.1 and staged them on http://people.apache.org/~madams/jdo3.0.1/dist/db/jdo/3.0.1/ This is a result of the efforts of the JDO expert group and the Apache JDO

Re: Updating KEYS

Got it. Should that file go under source control somewhere? On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: Oops, I mean http://www.apache.org/dist/db/**jdo/KEYShttp://www.apache.org/dist/db/jdo/KEYS Craig On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Craig L Russell

[VOTE] JDO 3.0.1 release

We have prepared the release artifacts for JDO 3.0.1 and staged them on http://people.apache.org/~madams/jdo3.0.1/dist/db/jdo/3.0.1/ This is a result of the efforts of the JDO expert group and the Apache JDO community. If you get this message more than once, just use it as a reminder to vote.

[ANNOUNCE] JDO 3.0.1 release available for testing

The JDO 3.0.1 release is available for testing. It is available at http://people.apache.org/~madams/jdo3.0.1/dist/db/jdo/3.0.1/ Please test and report errors found back to jdo-dev@db.apache.org. -matthew

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

Sent announcement to test the release. On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.mewrote: C:\OpenSource\jdosvn ci -m checking in what I have done so far SendingHowToReleaseJDO.html Sendingbin\sign-directory Sendingbranches\3.0.1

Re: New Feature Idea

Hi Tim, We are in the process of standardizing similar functionality, called type safe query, which is currently functional, albeit proprietary, in the JDO RI, DataNucleus: http://www.datanucleus.org/products/accessplatform/jdo/jdoql_typesafe.html Check that out and see if it meets your needs.

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

... Committed revision 1195022. I'll resume the release process next. -matthew On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.mewrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.me wrote: This thread will attempt to track what I did to release JDO 3.0.1

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

--- Total time : 43 seconds Finished at : Saturday, October 29, 2011 6:38:13 PM CDT Final Memory : 14M/181M --- On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Adams matt

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.mewrote: Resolved. Found vdoclet:qdox:current:jar only in Maven2 central at http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/vdoclet/qdox/current/ Manually installed to ~/.maven/repository/vdoclet/jars then maven jdo3.dist says it succeeded. Updated

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

browsing on people.apache.org -- any ideas? I also sent an email to infrastruct...@apache.org. On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.mewrote: Used cygwin to run jdo/bin/sign-directory on directory jdo/releases/3.0.1. Updated script to use Linux commands by default

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

While I'm waiting for infra to get back to me, the next instruction says Test the release from the staging area. What does that mean? On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.mewrote: scp'ed the dist to ~/public_html/jdo3.0.1 at my account at people.apache.org. I

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

Issued maven installSchema maven runtck.jdori and both succeeded. Looks like it still works. On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: On Oct 29, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Matthew Adams wrote: While I'm waiting for infra to get back to me, the next

Re: Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.me wrote: This thread will attempt to track what I did to release JDO 3.0.1. Tasks completed: * Created svn branch branches/3.0.1 from branches/3.0 * In 3.0.1 branch, updated README.html where appropriate to refer to 3.0.1

Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Oct 21, 9 am Pacific Time

Cool! Sent from mobile device. Responses brief. On Oct 22, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Michael Bouschen michael.bousc...@akquinet.de wrote: Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-700 may be because there is a new package for a pc test class? I looked at JDO-700. It has nothing to do

Tracking JDO 3.0.1 release

This thread will attempt to track what I did to release JDO 3.0.1. Tasks completed: * Created svn branch branches/3.0.1 from branches/3.0 -- @matthewadams12 mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me skype:matthewadams12 yahoo:matthewadams aol:matthewadams12 google-talk:matthewadam...@gmail.com

Major version number change to 4.0?

Hi all, I know we recently released 3.0, will release 3.0.1 soon, and are planning 3.1. The thing is, we are planning on removing interface JDOEntityManagerFactory, which I believe to be a breaking change. IMHO, that should warrant a rev of the major version number, so that JDO 3.1 really should

Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Oct 14, 9 am Pacific Time

One minor clarification: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:  2.  JDO 3.0 dependency on JPA 3.0 (and 3.0.1) still depend on JPA 1.0. We decided that 3.1 did not allow use of JPA 2.0 and it doesn't make sense to continue to support JPA 1.0.

Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Oct 14, 9 am Pacific Time

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:  3.  Other issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-696 applies to both JDOHelper as well as IUT if the PMF is constructed directly with a new VendorPersistenceManagerFactory. Add api test case and tck

Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Oct 14, 9 am Pacific Time

Refactored attached patch. FYI, refactoring has spec ramifications. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-696. On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Matthew Adams wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Craig

FYI: Minor change to JDO api trunk that affects you

Hi Andy, FYI, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-696 introduces an API behavior change and specification change that affects you, but most of the work has been done already. The only thing you have to do is ensure that the properties given to you contain no unknown standard JDO

JDO 3.0 dependency on JPA

Hi all, As a result of my request that SpringSource put JDO 3.0 into their Enterprise Bundle Repository, a convenient repo of OSGi-compliant bundles of otherwise non-OSGi-compliant jars (https://issuetracker.springsource.com/browse/EBR-773), SpringSource has done so. The JDO 3.0 bundle can be

Re: JDO 3.0 dependency on JPA

Well, the one I've used is this, which is in Maven central: dependency groupIdorg.eclipse.persistence/groupId artifactIdjavax.persistence/artifactId version2.0.0/version /dependency EclipseLink is the RI for JPA 2.0, so it's the closest I think I we can get to official. AFAIK, there

Re: API : compilation failure

Not sure. Works for me. Michael's last checkin didn't really change anything, since my last check-in included changes to EnhancerTest's ancestry such that AbstractTest, its superclass, implements Constants. Have you gotten latest on the whole api project lately? -matthew On Sat, Oct 8, 2011

Re: API : compilation failure

Ok, totally my bad. I forgot a bunch of files when I checked in fixes for JDO-688. Get latest retry. So sorry about that. -matthew On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Andy Jefferson a...@datanucleus.org wrote: Not sure.  Works for me. Michael's last checkin didn't really change anything,

FYI: api trunk state

Hi all, So I goofed twice. First, I forgot some files when checking in isolated changes for JDO-688. Then, accidentally included changes for JDO-695 when trying to fix the problem for JDO-688. Long story short, changes for both of these issues are checked in to trunk now. Let me know if you

Re: FYI: requested Gemini.JDO as a peer project to Gemini.JPA

You can always subscribe to the issue... On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: I'm keen to hear of the status of this request as it moves through the system. Craig On Oct 3, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: FYI, https://bugs.eclipse.org

Re: Unrecognized javax.jdo options: throw?

Cool. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-696 On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: On Sep 29, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: Hi all, As I was entering issues like JDO-693, I wondered whether implementations should throw if any

Unrecognized javax.jdo options: throw?

Hi all, As I was entering issues like JDO-693, I wondered whether implementations should throw if any unrecognized standard configuration options that start with javax.jdo. WDYT? -matthew -- @matthewadams12 mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me skype:matthewadams12 yahoo:matthewadams

Big patch

Hi all, Attached is a patch to trunk for JDO-693 JDO-688. It also fixes the failing tests in PMFMapMapTest. I refactored the JDOConfigTestClassLoader to be simpler. Don't remember what I was thinking way back when I wrote it, but it's way simpler now. I'd thought about creating a roll-up

Re: Big patch

Done. See JDO-695. On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm afraid only the subscribers to jdo-experts got the attachment. Can you please attach it to one of the JIRA issues? Thanks, Craig On Sep 27, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Matthew

Re: Maven bundle plugin pom excerpt

Version 1.4.0? That's pretty old. We're using 2.3.5: plugin groupIdorg.apache.felix/groupId artifactIdmaven-bundle-plugin/artifactId version2.3.5/version extensionstrue/extensions ...

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Sep 10, 9 am Pacific Time

Is there no meeting today? I'm on the call and I'm just hearing some really awesome music... On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Michelle Caisse mcai...@sonic.net wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, September 10 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status.

Re: CANCELLED: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Sep 02, 9 am Pacific Time

Sure, although I have no idea how to do that. Can you RMTFM? On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: Hi Matthew, On Sep 1, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Matthew Adams wrote: Gosh darn doo-hickey heck. I was hoping to discuss JDO-684 JDO-685. I suppose

Re: CANCELLED: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Sep 02, 9 am Pacific Time

Gosh darn doo-hickey heck. I was hoping to discuss JDO-684 JDO-685. I suppose conversing in JIRA is good enough. What do you all think about a quick push of JDO 3.0.1 out the door for the corrected OSGi Export-Package headers? -matthew On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Michelle Caisse

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Aug 26, 9 am Pacific Time

I'd like to join. My skype id is matthewadams12. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Michelle Caisse mcai...@sonic.net wrote: Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, August 26 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. The telecon will be held on Skype this week. Send

Re: JDO Logging Severe message

This is better asked on the Google AppEngine for Java forum, but since it's a JDOCanRetryException, I imagine it's not too bad. Remember that Google maintains the DataNucleus plugin that enables them to offer JDO support. -matthew On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:35 AM, li8ras li8...@hotmail.com

Re: Asynchronous database ops in JDO - something for the future?

Hi David, Interesting ideas. If you can, please file a JIRA so that we can track it. It would probably be related to issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651 . -matthew On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:14 PM, David Bullock dtbull...@gmail.com wrote: Hi JDO specification folk, One

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Mar 18, 9 am Pacific Time

Sorry, can't make it today... On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:41 PM, mcai...@sonic.net wrote:  Hi,  We will have our regular meeting Friday, March 18, at 9 am Pacific Time  to discuss JDO TCK issues and status.  Dial-in numbers are:  US Toll free: 866 682-4770  Germany Frankfurt 06916106

FYI: JPA 2.1 EG

Linda approved my membership to JPA 2.1. Anyone else planning to? The more, the merrier, I say. Apply to join at http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=338 -- look for the text I would like to join this Expert Group, just below the list of experts. The current list can be found there, too. -matthew

Re: ant optional?

Maven's test scope only means that it needs to be on the test classpath. It would not introduce a runtime or even compile time dependency of jdo-api.jar. Optional means that if Maven can't find it, compilation should still succeed, which it wouldn't if it weren't available. Again, scope and

Re: ant optional?

a patch for one of us to commit. Craig On Dec 9, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: Maven's test scope only means that it needs to be on the test classpath. It would not introduce a runtime or even compile time dependency of jdo-api.jar. Optional means that if Maven can't find

ant optional?

Hi guys, I was just looking at the pom in trunk/api and noticed that on line 133, the Ant dependency is declared optional. This is actually not true, as some of the code in the test project can't compile without it. I propose removing the optional line. Cool? -matthew --

Re: ant optional?

It already is. The scope is orthogonal to whether it's optional. -matthew On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: Hi guys, I was just looking at the pom in trunk/api and noticed that on line 133

Re: Fetch configuration

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: Seems like a good idea. Could foreign keys be considered the same as basic fields for the purposes of the default fetch group? That is, fetched by default

Re: Fetch configuration

Seems like a good idea. Could foreign keys be considered the same as basic fields for the purposes of the default fetch group? That is, fetched by default unless the user says don't fetch? I assume that if an object is loaded using a fetch group that doesn't include foreign keys and the foreign

Re: [VOTE] JDO 3.0 release

+1 On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: We have prepared the release artifacts for JDO 3.0 and staged them on http://people.apache.org/~clr/dist/db/jdo/3.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Eclr/dist/db/jdo/3.0/ This is the culmination of the efforts of

Re: Testing the JDO 3.0 release

I will. It's been a while, though. How do I get test the 3.0 stuff? Check out from svn or other? On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: Hi, Can we get a couple of volunteers to test the release? I've checked over the zip and tar files and would

Re: Testing the JDO 3.0 release

program. Thanks, Craig On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: I will. It's been a while, though. How do I get test the 3.0 stuff? Check out from svn or other? On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: Hi, Can we get a couple

  1   2   >