[jira] Resolved: (JDO-139) Issues with tck20 test case transaction.GetOptimistic

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-139?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-139: -- Resolution: Fixed I removed class GetOptimistic and updated the assertion spreadsheet. I also updated class Rollback to not refer the query test class

[jira] Created: (JDO-139) Issues with tck20 test case transaction.GetOptimistic

Issues with tck20 test case transaction.GetOptimistic - Key: JDO-139 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-139 Project: JDO Type: Bug Components: tck20 Reporter: Michael Bouschen Assigned to:

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-51) Improve documentation on build dependencies

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-51?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-51: - Resolution: Fixed I added new goals to the top level maven.xml to clean and build jdo11, jdo20 and tck20 projects: jdo11.build - builds all JDO1 projects

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-51) Improve documentation on build dependencies

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-51?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-51: --- Assign To: Michael Bouschen (was: Michelle Caisse) Improve documentation on build dependencies --- Key:

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-142) Restructure query test packages

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-142?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-142: -- Resolution: Fixed Checked in query test repackaging (see revision 290687). Restructure query test packages ---

[jira] Updated: (JDO-92) Remove support for GUI test runner

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-92?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-92: Attachment: JDO92.patch Attached you find a patch removing the GUI test runner (SwingTestRunner), class TestListSuite and the outdated list of test classes

[jira] Updated: (JDO-153) Upgrade springframework version used in tck20/tck11

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-153?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-153: - Attachment: springUpgrade.patch Attached you find a patch upgrading to stringframework version 1.2.5. Upgrade springframework version used in tck20/tck11

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-153) Upgrade springframework version used in tck20/tck11

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-153?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-153: -- Resolution: Fixed With version 1.2 springframework introduced a new separate jar for the bean factory classes. So I needed to add a dependency for the

[jira] Commented: (JDO-156) Implement infrastructur to execute JDOQL queries as single queries or API queries

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-156?page=comments#action_12331810 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-156: -- The patch looks good, just a few comments: QueryElementHolder: - I propose to change the constructor arguments specifying the range

[jira] Commented: (JDO-156) Implement infrastructur to execute JDOQL queries as single queries or API queries

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-156?page=comments#action_12331876 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-156: -- Two minors: - QueryElementHolder: there is a private method rangeToString to create the range element for a single string query. I

[jira] Commented: (JDO-157) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning keywords.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-157?page=comments#action_12331882 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-157: -- Just some minor comments: Class CompanyModelReader - The CompanyModelReader change is already checked in as part of patch 156.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-158) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning new operators.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-158?page=comments#action_12331885 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-158: -- - A14.6.2-40: modulo operator. The current implementation uses a QueryElementHolder to run a modulo query as API query and single

[jira] Commented: (JDO-157) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning keywords.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-157?page=comments#action_12331895 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-157: -- Looks good! Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning keywords. --

[jira] Commented: (JDO-158) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning new operators.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-158?page=comments#action_12331969 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-158: -- Looks good, ship it! Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning new operators.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-159) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning new supported methods.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-159?page=comments#action_12331973 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-159: -- A few comments. Class SupportedStringMethods: - Typo (Map instead of String) in the title: Supported Map methods - How about using

[jira] Commented: (JDO-160) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning parameters.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-160?page=comments#action_12332218 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-160: -- Some comments about JDO-160.patch: OrderOfParameters: - I propose to add a second test query that switches the order of param1 and

[jira] Updated: (JDO-178) javax.jdo.spi.I18NHelper causes NullPointerException

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-178?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-178: - Component: api11 api20 javax.jdo.spi.I18NHelper causes NullPointerException

[jira] Commented: (JDO-154) Add tests for getUserObject, putUserObject, removeUserObject

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-154?page=comments#action_12332371 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-154: -- I looked at the patch. I just have one question: would it make sense to call putUserObject a second time for the same key and verify

[jira] Commented: (JDO-160) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning parameters.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-160?page=comments#action_12332464 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-160: -- Two comments: - Class OrderOfParameters defines queries using explicilty declared parameters . I propose to change this to implicit

[jira] Commented: (JDO-161) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning variables.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-161?page=comments#action_12355946 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-161: -- Some comments: datastoreidentity/schema.sql: - The patch replaces table JDOQLKeywordsAsFieldNames with table NoExtent. instad of

[jira] Commented: (JDO-162) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning other language changes.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-162?page=comments#action_12355947 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-162: -- Some comments about the patch CharacterAndStringLiterals.java: - I propose to change the filter of the invalid query to charNotNull

[jira] Commented: (JDO-161) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning variables.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-161?page=comments#action_12356056 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-161: -- The new patch looks good. Just one comment: I think support for unconstrained variables is optional, so classes

[jira] Commented: (JDO-188) Add tests for static JDOHelper.getObjectIds methods

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-188?page=comments#action_12356278 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-188: -- The patch looks good. Just one remark: the localSetUp method creates a second PM which is not closed in the test case. Should we

[jira] Closed: (JDO-36) Implement JDOQLQueryFactory proposal

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-36?page=all ] Michael Bouschen closed JDO-36: --- Implement JDOQLQueryFactory proposal Key: JDO-36 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-36

[jira] Closed: (JDO-139) Issues with tck20 test case transaction.GetOptimistic

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-139?page=all ] Michael Bouschen closed JDO-139: Issues with tck20 test case transaction.GetOptimistic - Key: JDO-139 URL:

[jira] Closed: (JDO-153) Upgrade springframework version used in tck20/tck11

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-153?page=all ] Michael Bouschen closed JDO-153: Upgrade springframework version used in tck20/tck11 --- Key: JDO-153 URL:

[jira] Commented: (JDO-163) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning query API Extensions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-163?page=comments#action_12356501 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-163: -- A lot of new test cases. They look good, just a few comments: QueryTest: The new method takes an expected result and assumes an

[jira] Commented: (JDO-163) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning query API Extensions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-163?page=comments#action_12357022 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-163: -- The second patch looks good. Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning query API Extensions

[jira] Commented: (JDO-204) Need attribute on field element for type

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-204?page=comments#action_12357741 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-204: -- I understand the scenario that the user wants to store instances of different PC types in the collection. This means even with JDK 5

[jira] Commented: (JDO-216) Result handling in class QueryTest must be capable to consider return types of java.lang.Object

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-216?page=comments#action_12357969 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-216: -- Look s good, just a few comments: QueryTest - Methods getCompanyModelInstances and getMylibInstances are deprecated, but we might

[jira] Commented: (JDO-164) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning result handling.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-164?page=comments#action_12358151 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-164: -- The patch looks good. Class Unique has the comment talking about avoiding file I/O which we can remove. Implement new JDO 2 query

[jira] Commented: (JDO-165) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning SQL queries.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-165?page=comments#action_12358359 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-165: -- Looks good. Some comments: ShapeOfResult: - I guess the C in the comment of the first two queries in VALID_SQL_QUERIES means

[jira] Commented: (JDO-165) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning SQL queries.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-165?page=comments#action_12358396 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-165: -- Looks good, no comments! Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning SQL queries.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-223) SupportedMapMethods miss queries calling isEmpty() and size(). SupportedCollectionMethods must be extended by queries calling contains() and size().

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-223?page=comments#action_12358620 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-223: -- Looks good! SupportedMapMethods miss queries calling isEmpty() and size(). SupportedCollectionMethods must be extended by queries

[jira] Commented: (JDO-224) Adapt ResultClassRequirements to new wording in spec concerning assertion A14.6.12-1.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-224?page=comments#action_12358621 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-224: -- Looks good! Adapt ResultClassRequirements to new wording in spec concerning assertion A14.6.12-1.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-226) DistintCandidateInstances.testCollectionQueries typo

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-226?page=comments#action_12358783 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-226: -- Looks good! DistintCandidateInstances.testCollectionQueries typo

[jira] Commented: (JDO-166) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning deletion by query.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-166?page=comments#action_12359034 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-166: -- Looks good. However, I propose to update the comments in DeleteQueryElements, because I think some of them are misleading, e.g.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-147) Remove pm.deletePersistent from query tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-147?page=comments#action_12359142 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-147: -- Oops, I forgot two comments: - Class StringConcatenation defines a field parameters for the actual parameters of the test queries.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-147) Remove pm.deletePersistent from query tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-147?page=comments#action_12359141 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-147: -- Oops, I forgot two comments: - Class StringConcatenation defines a field parameters for the actual parameters of the test queries.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-228) Enhancer error message for org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/mylib/PCClass.jdo

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-228?page=comments#action_12359718 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-228: -- The patch looks good! Enhancer error message for org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/mylib/PCClass.jdo

[jira] Commented: (JDO-229) Class DeleteCallback must not assume managed relationships.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-229?page=comments#action_12359720 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-229: -- The second patch looks good. Class DeleteCallback must not assume managed relationships.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-167) Inheritance mapping 2 needs to be changed to support polymorphic relationships to Employees

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-167?page=comments#action_12359737 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-167: -- Looks good! Inheritance mapping 2 needs to be changed to support polymorphic relationships to Employees

[jira] Created: (JDO-238) Timing bug in TCK test case ThreadSafe

Timing bug in TCK test case ThreadSafe -- Key: JDO-238 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-238 Project: JDO Type: Bug Components: tck11, tck20 Reporter: Michael Bouschen Assigned to: Martin Zaun Priority:

[jira] Commented: (JDO-230) Fix order of makePersistent() and addTearDownClass() in localSetUp methods

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-230?page=comments#action_12359873 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-230: -- The patch looks good, no comments. Fix order of makePersistent() and addTearDownClass() in localSetUp methods

[jira] Commented: (JDO-243) JPOX must throw JDOUserException for group by queries which select non-grouped fields.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-243?page=comments#action_12360314 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-243: -- my $0.02: I think it is dangerous to automatically add the field to the grouping, because this changes the semantics of the query as

[jira] Commented: (JDO-256) Inheritance mapping 1 fails for datastore identity.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-256?page=comments#action_12360316 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-256: -- Both xml files companyNoRelationships and companyAllRelationships define the same pc instances, but companyNoRelationships does not

[jira] Updated: (JDO-206) JDOQL test NotEquals comparing floating point numbers

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-206?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-206: - Attachment: JDO-206.patch I agree with Erik that there is a problem with derby since it converts the float value to a double when storing. However, this test

[jira] Updated: (JDO-244) JPOX generates illegal SQL for having clauses using COUNT.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-244?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-244: - Attachment: JDO-244.patch I agree we should changet the query. The attached patch changes the query to SELECT department, SUM(salary) FROM

[jira] Updated: (JDO-206) JDOQL test NotEquals comparing floating point numbers

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-206?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-206: - Attachment: JDO-206.patch2 Attached you find a new patch (JDO-206.patch2) for review. The patch changes the schema for derby and uses the coumn type REAL for

[jira] Commented: (JDO-194) JPOX does not support implicit variables.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-194?page=comments#action_12360951 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-194: -- Interesting! Yes, I'm using Windows. I think it has to do with queries using a variable with the same name as a class (modulo case).

[jira] Commented: (JDO-244) JPOX generates illegal SQL for having clauses using COUNT.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-244?page=comments#action_12361068 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-244: -- I checked in the updated patch (revision 358395). However, the test org.apache.jdo.tck.query.result.Having still fails, because it

[jira] Commented: (JDO-264) Fix issues in maven.xml preventing iut goals from running properly

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-264?page=comments#action_12361124 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-264: -- The patch looks good. About your question: I'm not sure whether we still need the property iut.enhancer.classpath. Especially

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-194) JPOX does not support implicit variables.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-194?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-194: Assign To: Michael Bouschen (was: Erik Bengtson) JPOX does not support implicit variables. - Key:

[jira] Commented: (JDO-194) JPOX does not support implicit variables.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-194?page=comments#action_12361212 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-194: -- Sorry Andy, this seems to be a JRE problem when running on Windows. I tried, but the problem remains: at

[jira] Commented: (JDO-257) Change return type of makePersistent from void to Object

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-257?page=comments#action_12361527 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-257: -- Checked in the patch (modified according to Craig's comment); see revision 365353. Change return type of makePersistent from void

[jira] Commented: (JDO-245) JPOX must throw JDOUserException for queries specifying having clause refering fields which are not part of the result clause.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-245?page=comments#action_12361607 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-245: -- The negative test is only testing whether the JDO implementation throws an exception for the invalid HAVING clause. It does not

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-244) JPOX generates illegal SQL for having clauses using COUNT.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-244?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-244: -- Resolution: Fixed Good point Andy! Actually the generated SQL is correct. I know what the problem is: the JDOQL query is not valid. It accesses a field

[jira] Commented: (JDO-245) JPOX must throw JDOUserException for queries specifying having clause refering fields which are not part of the result clause.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-245?page=comments#action_12361678 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-245: -- A lot of comments, I'll try to give answers. CLR: There is only one thing wrong with this query: the HAVING clause is not a

[jira] Commented: (JDO-269) Change setId methods to allow construction of Company Model classes with default constructor

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-269?page=comments#action_12361685 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-269: -- The patch looks good. One question: with the patch 0 cannot be used as valid id, because the code interprets id=0 as undefined id.

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-242) JPOX returns wrong query result for test case Grouping.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-242?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-242: -- Resolution: Fixed This is the same as described in JDO-244 and JDO-271: the JDOQL query is not valid, because it uses a field from the subclass. Craig

[jira] Updated: (JDO-245) JPOX must throw JDOUserException for a query using a non grouping expr w/o aggregates in the HAVING clause.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-245?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-245: - Summary: JPOX must throw JDOUserException for a query using a non grouping expr w/o aggregates in the HAVING clause. (was: JPOX must throw JDOUserException

[jira] Updated: (JDO-258) Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-258?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-258: - Summary: Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions (was: Write tests for attach/detach lifecycle assertions) Write tests for

[jira] Reopened: (JDO-259) Write tests for attach/detach behavior assertions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-259?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reopened JDO-259: -- Reopened. The title is misleading: it talks about detach/attach where the issue is about persistent-nontransactional-dirty. Write tests for

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-64) Enhancer test cases must be adapted to JDO2.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-64?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-64: --- Assign To: Martin Zaun Enhancer test cases must be adapted to JDO2. Key: JDO-64 URL:

[jira] Updated: (JDO-275) Split out alltests.conf into several, smaller configurations

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-275?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-275: - Fix Version: JDO 2 beta Split out alltests.conf into several, smaller configurations

[jira] Commented: (JDO-277) Change wage in PartTimeEmployee instances to a small number

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-277?page=comments#action_12362681 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-277: -- The patch looks good. You might want to take a look at the other company model test data xml files, because they might define the

[jira] Updated: (JDO-279) Release tck20 as source with a binary dependency on other projects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-279?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-279: - Attachment: distrib.patch2 Attached you find a new patch distrib.patch2. - I think any groupId changes should be part of of JDO-278, so I removed any groupId

[jira] Commented: (JDO-278) Change group ids for jdo projects from apache-jdo to javax.jdo and org.apache.jdo

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-278?page=comments#action_12363038 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-278: -- Looks good, just a few comments: - All the default goals in the maven.xml files now call jar:install instead of

[jira] Updated: (JDO-279) Release tck20 as source with a binary dependency on other projects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-279?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-279: - Attachment: mavenDistSupport.patch Andy proposed to use 'maven dist' for the distribution. There is not need to add our own distrib goal to tck20, so forget

[jira] Commented: (JDO-279) Release tck20 as source with a binary dependency on other projects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-279?page=comments#action_12363463 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-279: -- I checked in the patch mavenDistSupport-2.patch ino the trunk and into branches/2.0-beta (see revision 370910). Release tck20 as

[jira] Updated: (JDO-279) Release tck20 as source with a binary dependency on other projects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-279?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-279: - Attachment: mavenDistSupport-3.patch The new patch mavenDistSupport-3.patch adds the directories assertions and iut_jars to the jdo2-tck distribution. I

[jira] Commented: (JDO-279) Release tck20 as source with a binary dependency on other projects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-279?page=comments#action_12363537 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-279: -- Hi Craig, I did not intent to include the content of iut_jars, just the empty directory: include name=iut_jars/ exclude

[jira] Commented: (JDO-279) Release tck20 as source with a binary dependency on other projects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-279?page=comments#action_12363541 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-279: -- Checked in, see revision 371128. Release tck20 as source with a binary dependency on other projects

[jira] Updated: (JDO-284) build.properties is missing from distribution

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-284?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-284: - Attachment: JDO-284.patch Attached you find a patch (JDO-284.patch) that updates the dist:build-src preGoald to include the build.properties into the

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-284) build.properties is missing from distribution

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-284?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-284: Assign To: Michael Bouschen build.properties is missing from distribution - Key: JDO-284

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-284) build.properties is missing from distribution

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-284?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-284: -- Fix Version: JDO 2 beta Resolution: Fixed Thanks Michelle! I cheched in the changes plus removing the generated build.xml from the distribution

[jira] Commented: (JDO-246) JPOX eliminates duplicates in the query result although DISTINCT is not specified.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-246?page=comments#action_12364631 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-246: -- Here is the JDOQL: SELECT e.manager.lastname FROM org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.company.Department WHERE employees.contains(e) VARIABLES

[jira] Commented: (JDO-246) JPOX eliminates duplicates in the query result although DISTINCT is not specified.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-246?page=comments#action_12364667 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-246: -- Section 14.6.9 Specifying the Result of a Query (Projections, Aggregates) explicitly defines a different behavior in case a variable

[jira] Commented: (JDO-246) JPOX eliminates duplicates in the query result although DISTINCT is not specified.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-246?page=comments#action_12364812 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-246: -- I'm a little confused about the term intersection. Just for my understanding: do you mean Cartesian product? Here is my

[jira] Updated: (JDO-297) RI11 doesn't run

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-297?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-297: - Attachment: jdo11.patch I agree, we should use SNAPSHOT in the trunk. The attached patch jdo11.patch changes the version in api11, ri11 and tck11 to SNAPSHOT

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-297) RI11 doesn't run

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-297?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-297: Assign To: Michael Bouschen RI11 doesn't run Key: JDO-297 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-297

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-297) RI11 doesn't run

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-297?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-297: -- Resolution: Fixed Checked in patch jdo11.patch. RI11 doesn't run Key: JDO-297 URL:

[jira] Commented: (JDO-303) NPE in ResultSummary if no tests were run

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-303?page=comments#action_12366030 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-303: -- Looks good! NPE in ResultSummary if no tests were run - Key: JDO-303

[jira] Updated: (JDO-202) orm.xsd and unit tests for xsd are missing

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-202?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-202: - Attachment: schemaValidation-060212.patch The attached patch schemaValidation-060212.patch adds a new test XMLTest. orm.xsd and unit tests for xsd are missing

[jira] Created: (JDO-305) Remove keyword IMPORTS from TCK query test classes

Remove keyword IMPORTS from TCK query test classes -- Key: JDO-305 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-305 Project: JDO Type: Bug Components: tck20 Versions: JDO 2 beta Reporter: Michael

[jira] Updated: (JDO-305) Remove keyword IMPORTS from TCK query test classes

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-305?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-305: - Attachment: JDO-305.patch The attached patch JDO-305.patch for review fixes the two classes SingleStringQuery and QueryElementHolder and removes the 'IMPORTS'

[jira] Created: (JDO-310) TCK query test VariableInResult fails with JDODataStoreException

TCK query test VariableInResult fails with JDODataStoreException Key: JDO-310 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-310 Project: JDO Type: Bug Components: tck20 Reporter: Michael

[jira] Commented: (JDO-313) ERROR 08001: No suitable driver on connection attempt to install schema

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-313?page=comments#action_12367578 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-313: -- I renamed my .maven directory and did a maven tck20.build in the trunk. It works! It regenerated the plugin cache, downloaded tons

[jira] Created: (JDO-319) Enhance api20 XMLTest so that users can check their own .jdo .orm, and .jdoquery files

Enhance api20 XMLTest so that users can check their own .jdo .orm, and .jdoquery files -- Key: JDO-319 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-319 Project: JDO Type:

[jira] Created: (JDO-320) Add negative query test for projecting a map and collection field to tck20

Add negative query test for projecting a map and collection field to tck20 -- Key: JDO-320 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-320 Project: JDO Type: Test Components: tck20

[jira] Updated: (JDO-319) Enhance api20 XMLTest so that users can check their own .jdo .orm, and .jdoquery files

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-319?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-319: - Attachment: JDO-319-060225.patch The attached patch JDO-219-060225.patch includes the first version of the XMLTest enhancement for discussion. It adds a new

[jira] Created: (JDO-321) Add test queries accessing a public static final field declared in a company model class

Add test queries accessing a public static final field declared in a company model class Key: JDO-321 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-321 Project: JDO Type: Test

[jira] Commented: (JDO-316) TCK should allow user to configure their own JNDI provider

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-316?page=comments#action_12368278 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-316: -- Th patch looks good! Just one comment: should we give the new path a better name than 'jndi'?. This path can include any third

[jira] Commented: (JDO-324) Derby ERROR 40XL1 in multithreaded test RefreshAllNoParameterSideEffects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-324?page=comments#action_12368352 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-324: -- I agree, the test is not correct. I think we do not need multiple threads to test the assertion. Here is what I think the test

[jira] Updated: (JDO-321) Add test queries accessing a public static final field declared in a company model class

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-321?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-321: - Attachment: JDO-321.patch Attached you find aptach JDO-321.patch for review. It adds a public static final field to class Department and three new query test

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-320) Add negative query test for projecting a map and collection field to tck20

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-320?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-320: Assign To: Erik Bengtson (was: Michael Bouschen) Checked in the patch which adds two negative test queries to class

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-321) Add test queries accessing a public static final field declared in a company model class

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-321?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-321: Assign To: Erik Bengtson (was: Michael Bouschen) Checked in the patch adding new query tests accessing public static fields (see revision 383192).

[jira] Commented: (JDO-309) minor extensions to tck20's JDO_Test and ThreadExceptionHandler

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-309?page=comments#action_12369322 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-309: -- Hi Martin, the ThreadExceptionHandler changes look good. I looked at the RougueBarriere class. It's small, but still takes some

[jira] Commented: (JDO-190) Add test for PersistenceManagerFactory.getDataStoreCache()

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-190?page=comments#action_12369527 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-190: -- Looks good. Just a minor comment: I would move method localSetUp after method main. Add test for

[jira] Commented: (JDO-272) Create tests for section 12.6.8, detachment behavior

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-272?page=comments#action_12369552 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-272: -- Looks good. Create tests for section 12.6.8, detachment behavior

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >