Re: ASM in core

In the case of system properties https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/system-properties/ Says: Compatibility We do *NOT* guarantee that system properties will remain unchanged and functional indefinitely. These

Re: Introducing Community.jenkins.io (Beta)

Thanks a lot to Gavin, Olivier, Tim and all other contributors! The new channel already looks awesome. I will start moving topics to Discourse where reasonable On Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 8:07:10 AM UTC+2 ga...@gavinmogan.com wrote: > TL;DR - New centralized community site -

Re: ASM in core

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 7:36 PM Jesse Glick wrote: > > JNR may be a similar story. I see all of two usages in core—both disabled > unless you set a system property. Just deleting it all may be easier I had already noticed that as well and thought about opening such a PR to delete all usages of

Re: ASM in core

ASM is a dependency of the parser used (parboiled). People still use token macro a lot even in pipeline even if there are other ways of doing what it does. On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 7:36 PM Jesse Glick wrote: > We should also take a step back and see if these problematic deps really > need to

Re: ASM in core

We should also take a step back and see if these problematic deps really need to exist at all. Most uses of ASM should be deleted if at all possible. I was able to remove Digester and thus, I guess, ASM from the Subversion plugin without much difficulty. I do not understand Token Macro well enough

Re: Backporting for LTS 2.289.2 started

Added it in, PR is https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5573 On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 17:18, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 9:50 AM Tim Jacomb wrote: > >> Any thoughts on https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-64347? >> >> It has only been in one weekly version so far.

Re: Using JDK 11 instead of JDK 8 in default docker images

The docs on Jenkins.Io, dockerhub and in the docker GitHub repo were all updated to use the jdk11 variant but the latest image tag isn’t changed yet On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 15:03, Slide wrote: > I think Mark was looking at doing the migration in September if I remember > correctly. > > On Mon,

Re: Backporting for LTS 2.289.2 started

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 9:50 AM Tim Jacomb wrote: > Any thoughts on https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-64347? > > It has only been in one weekly version so far. > +0.5 from me, basically the same justification as Basil. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Backporting for LTS 2.289.2 started

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:50 AM Tim Jacomb wrote: > > Any thoughts on https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-64347? > It has only been in one weekly version so far. No strong preference here and I am not personally affected by this bug, but it seems like it would affect most users of macOS

Re: Using JDK 11 instead of JDK 8 in default docker images

I think Mark was looking at doing the migration in September if I remember correctly. On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:20 AM 'Olblak' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > What the current state here? > Looks like the docker image still use java 8 by default but the helm

Re: Using JDK 11 instead of JDK 8 in default docker images

What the current state here? Looks like the docker image still use java 8 by default but the helm chart switched to java 11 Should we talk about switching to java11 by default during the contributor summit? On Monday, 10 May 2021 at 15:47:41 UTC+2 timja...@gmail.com wrote: > What metric would

Re: Backporting for LTS 2.289.2 started

Any thoughts on https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-64347? It has only been in one weekly version so far. On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 08:45, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Backporting has started and the RC is scheduled for 2021-06-16. > > Candidates:

Backporting for LTS 2.289.2 started

Hello everyone, Backporting has started and the RC is scheduled for 2021-06-16. Candidates: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?filter=12146 Fixed: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.289.2-fixed Rejected: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.289.2-rejected