Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:41 AM Basil Crow wrote: > There do not appear to be any known user-visible regressions in production > code in 2.414, but jenkinsci/jenkins#7872 > implies a change in > Login Theme (3,757 installations) which has not yet

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

Alternatively, 2.417 could be a viable candidate, as it includes the security fix, and could include both regression fixes for JENKINS-71698 and JENKINS-71699 , if reviewed within the next week.

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

Ah I see I missed that 2.415 was out. Let’s continue with 2.414 and backport security fixes On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 15:41, 'jn...@cloudbees.com' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > 2.415 appears to have a regression in the dialog handling that I just > found with

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

> 2.415 appears to have a regression in the dialog handling that I just found with a minimal amount of testing, so possibly too new to have had exposure :-( https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-71699 On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:31:21 PM UTC+1 jn...@cloudbees.com wrote: > Thanks Tim &

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

Thanks Tim & Basil for continuing this. I filed https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-71698 for LTS tracking and tagged the jenkins PR > Shall we go with 2.415 instead as it will have security fixes not sure I follow 2.415 is not a

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

Shall we go with 2.415 instead as it will have security fixes (given they would be backported anyway, it's less confusing if we start with the version they were introduced in I think)? The plugin manager bug in 2.414 has been fixed. On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 00:21, Basil Crow wrote: > On Fri, Jul

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:42 AM 'jn...@cloudbees.com' via Jenkins Developers wrote: > 2.414 has a regression in the plugin manager. > I would be -1 on this unless that is fixed (currently missing a Jenkins bug > but has been the cause of a lot of ATH failures) >

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

2.414 has a regression in the plugin manager. I would be -1 on this unless that is fixed (currently missing a Jenkins bug but has been the cause of a lot of ATH failures) https://github.com/jenkinsci/acceptance-test-harness/issues/1284 for the current status/investigation, I will file a Jenkins

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

Yes On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 19:47, Mark Waite wrote: > > > On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 9:41:51 AM UTC-6 Basil Crow wrote: > > There do not appear to be any known user-visible regressions in production > code in 2.414, but jenkinsci/jenkins#7872 >

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 9:41:51 AM UTC-6 Basil Crow wrote: There do not appear to be any known user-visible regressions in production code in 2.414, but jenkinsci/jenkins#7872 implies a change in Login Theme (3,757 installations) which has

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

There do not appear to be any known user-visible regressions in production code in 2.414, but jenkinsci/jenkins#7872 implies a change in Login Theme (3,757 installations) which has not yet been completed (tracked in JENKINS-71238

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

2.414 does have some benefits, like a Prototype fix and an optimization to the End of Life subsystem. The only risky portion is the Safe Restart change, but as Mark mentioned, this could always be patched or backed out if necessary. I audited the Safe Restart change, and it seems safe (no pun

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

No objections against 2.414 from my side either. On Wednesday, 12 July 2023 at 16:03:12 UTC+2 Mark Waite wrote: > On Wednesday, July 12, 2023 at 7:45:07 AM UTC-6 Alexander Brandes wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > I would recommend choosing 2.413 as baseline for the next LTS, as it > finalizes

Re: Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

On Wednesday, July 12, 2023 at 7:45:07 AM UTC-6 Alexander Brandes wrote: Hey everyone, I would recommend choosing 2.413 as baseline for the next LTS, as it finalizes fixing a major regression from 2.409. I think that 2.413 is a very safe choice as the next LTS baseline. It has good

Jenkins 2.413 as next LTS baseline?

Hey everyone, I would recommend choosing 2.413 as baseline for the next LTS, as it finalizes fixing a major regression from 2.409. An alternative would be 2.412, and backport the fixes for JENKINS-71553 . Despite the obvious hijacked voting