Re: [JEP-229] Plugin CD workflow version scheme

2022-03-30 Thread 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers
So I have next to nothing to add to this as I don't really do plugin dev or use the cd flow yet but a few thinks I might have picked up over the years. Afaik Jenkins has never claimed to be semver. Lots of people think plugins are, but it's probably more often not semver than is semver Secondly.

[JEP-229] Plugin CD workflow version scheme

2022-03-30 Thread Alex
I am a user of both Jenkins CloudBees an OSS version. In the last months, the Jenkins plugins version scheme changed for a few plugins and the experience for Jenkins maintainers to update these plugin with confidence regressed. With the new CD workflow, the version change to `{digit}.{hash}`

Re: Request for maintainer rights - jenkinsci/kubernetes-operator

2022-03-30 Thread 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers
looks like there's an invite link to their slack on https://jenkinsci.github.io/kubernetes-operator/ On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 4:07 AM Vanio Begic wrote: > > Hi Gavin, > > thanks for your response. I was not able to submit my request via the Slack > mentioned there since I am unable to access it

Re: Reverting JENKINS-20679

2022-03-30 Thread Mark Waite
+1 from me as well On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 6:00:20 AM UTC-6 Tim wrote: > +1 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Intellij Stapler Framework Support compatibility

2022-03-30 Thread Ullrich Hafner
Currently 2022.1 is in beta so I think it would be save to use 2021.1 as minimum baseline. Stapler plugin users are developers which typically use latest versions rather than outdated versions. So please go ahead and change the baseline. > Am 30.03.2022 um 06:41 schrieb Denys Digtiar : > > I

Re: Intellij Stapler Framework Support compatibility

2022-03-30 Thread Tim Jacomb
+100 On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 07:36, 'Daniel Beck' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:41 AM Denys Digtiar wrote: > >> >> Would anybody be opposed if I bump compatibility to some newer version? >> Maybe 2020.x or something like that? >> >>

Re: Reverting JENKINS-20679

2022-03-30 Thread Tim Jacomb
+1 On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 07:35, 'Daniel Beck' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 7:32 AM Basil Crow wrote: > >> >> > 1. IIRC I've seen plugins requiring Java 11 that just don't declare it. >> So it's not unused because it isn't needed,

Re: Intellij Stapler Framework Support compatibility

2022-03-30 Thread 'Daniel Beck' via Jenkins Developers
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:41 AM Denys Digtiar wrote: > > Would anybody be opposed if I bump compatibility to some newer version? > Maybe 2020.x or something like that? > > Go for it. As with Jenkins, if you don't update the core, you're probably not updating plugins either. -- You received

Re: Reverting JENKINS-20679

2022-03-30 Thread 'Daniel Beck' via Jenkins Developers
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 7:32 AM Basil Crow wrote: > > > 1. IIRC I've seen plugins requiring Java 11 that just don't declare it. > So it's not unused because it isn't needed, but perhaps because plugin > authors are unaware of it? > > I am not familiar with such cases, but I seriously doubt there

Re: [Proposal] Transfer of CloudBees-community/syslog-java-client to jenkinsci Github org

2022-03-30 Thread Basil Crow
Hi Cyrille, On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 3:39 AM 'Cyrille Le Clerc' via Jenkins Developers wrote: > I would definitely be interested in publishing the syslog-java-client library > to Maven Central from non Jenkins project to easily consume the library. Great! > My understanding of the Sonatype OSS