Re: Backports for 1.532.2

Tests looks good to me. Kohsuke, please post RC. https://jenkins.ci.cloudbees.com/job/core/job/jenkins_lts_branch/53/ -- oliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

Introducing Jenkins Config Cloner utility

Hi, I would like to introduce this little command line tool I use to move jobs around between different Jenkins instances. I find this useful when reproducing reported defects in testing environment and I plan to use this for larger migration of jobs and views. Tool identifies configured

Re: strange pushes on GitHub

Definitely related, selenium-tests repo lost 17+ commits after such push. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: AW - *PLEASE READ* Re: strange pushes on GitHub

I have already asked Github support to provide hashes of former master positions and referenced this thread. Will report ASAP. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: Backporting for 1.532.1 started

JENKINS-19739 backported -- oliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

Re: Backporting 1.509.4 complete

Hi, I have backported one more commit[1] Stephen wanted after the 1.509.4-rc was released. Contrary to what we have agreed on governance meeting I decided _not_ to backport JENKINS-19251 as it depends on JENKINS-16261 (which is something I should have checked before, sorry). If someone

Re: New Feature: Realtime test results for JUnit

I consider this pull request feature complete. If interested, try it out: https://jenkins.ci.cloudbees.com/job/core/job/jenkins_main_trunk/1247/artifact/war/target/jenkins.war -- oliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To

Re: 1.509.4 backporting

I would really like to avoid 1.509.5 . Can we produce 1.509.4-JENKINS-14362-jzlib before 1.509.4 or even before 1.509.4-rc so we can benefit from the reports? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: 1.509.4 backporting

Jesse under https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/a021fe5c2422c47d977d7937f4e01483f121b777: @olivergondza if you are backporting this then I would urge you to also backport https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/b02d45737e4eb7a0455ebe192271cf76bbf271e0 from

Re: New Feature: Realtime test results for JUnit

Hi, it's been a while but finally I have something that seems to work for freestyle, maven and matrix projects. I am working on report aggregation so it is sill a work in progress. But the most important part is done: asynchronous test result updating for individual builds. tl;dr: Every build

Re: New Feature: Realtime test results for JUnit

I am releasing this plugin to deliver the feature early. In the meantime, someone might find it useful. https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/JUnit+Realtime+Test+Reporter+Plugin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To

Re: Backporting for 1.509.3 started

Thanks. Reverting JENKINS-14351 as the fix for JENKINS-19192 is bright new. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: New Feature: Realtime test results for JUnit

Thanks for the feedback. I guess we agreed that it would be an interesting feature for core provided we can implement it in a reasonably efficient way. @kpfleming: We can do better than re-runing JUnitResultArchiver. I have modified the parser to update result object incrementally in order

Re: Backporting for 1.509.3 started

I assume we do not want to wait two weeks with 1.509.3 until stapler 1.217 became soaked. Besides, using stapler 1.217 in Jenkins seems to introduce new regression [1]. It seems that JENKINS-18776 is the only thing to revert it we want to stay on 1.207. So I vote for pushing it to 1.509.4 that

Re: New Feature: Realtime test results for JUnit

Thanks, never heard about the plugin before. This seems to require assistance from the project being built, right? I simply rerun JUnitParser to collect report files regardless where did they come from. Perhaps I'm wrong. I do not have enough time try it out. -- oliver -- You received

Re: Backporting for 1.509.3 started

From all the alternatives - not including the fix for JENKINS-18776 in 1.509.1 - reverting the bug in stapler, releasing it and using blending edge stapler in LTS Jenkins - or backporting necessary fix and using stapler 1.207.1 I prefer the last one but the decision is on you and Kohsuke.

Re: Backporting for 1.509.3 started

Jesse, The tags are in place. Maintaining a list of lts-candidates that has not been backported yet seems like an overkill to me. I was about to label the issues lts-1.509.3-fixed when they get merged to jenkinsci:stable. I do not mind labelling issues as fixed right away when backported to my

Re: Backporting for 1.509.3 started

I have started relabelling with lts-1.509.3-fixed. Candidates to go https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hiderequestId=12146 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: Move Matrix Tie Parent Plugin on Github

There seems to be https://github.com/jenkinsci/matrixtieparent-plugin repository. However, I do not know what is the relation between the two. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: Core commit rights for olivergondza

Bumping my original request. On Friday, April 12, 2013 5:42:17 PM UTC+2, ogondza wrote: Hi, Can I have commit rights granted for jenkins core? My ICLA was merged already (thanks Jesse). GitHub ID: olivergondza -- oliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Simple Jenkins plug-in hooked on the left menu

https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Basic+guide+to+Jelly+usage+in+Jenkins is a good start -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Selenium Tests for Plugins

The work is here https://github.com/jenkinsci/selenium-tests. It covers both the core and same plugins.

Re: How can I find my new plugin in JIRA?

Hi, What is the procedure for creating new JIRA components? There is quite a lot mailer-plugin related issues but corresponding component does not seem to exist.

Pull: Use build parameters in combination filters

Hi, it's been two months I proposed[1] a change that propagates build parameters to matrix combination filters. Several people seemed to be interested in such behaviour in the past, but the pull request remains unnoticed. [1] https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/584/ -- oliver

<    1   2