Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

Hi, The 2.30 release has been published. Thanks a lot to all contributors! The new LTS baseline selection is coming soon. My proposal would be to be more conservative for the next two weeks and to avoid merging potentially breaking changes (e.g. this guy

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

Hi, All the fixes are integrated. Changelogs for 2.30 are posted as well (here ). We are ready to roll out. Thanks a lot for the hard work Oleg. The community owes you much. Ah, thanks. People can always say

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

Hi, So we have at least 4 +1s in all PRs + a kind of "the approach looks good to me " from orrc in IRC. I think it's enough to proceed taking the current community ratings into account (2 positive vs. 9 negative). Kohsuke is available to spin the release, and I think it's better to do it

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

+1. I've already seen many users asking for help about that on IRC and on ml. Releasing earlier totally makes sense. Thanks a lot for the hard work Oleg. The community owes you much. Le 8 nov. 2016 12:04 AM, "Oleg Nenashev" a écrit : > Hi, > > So we have at least 4 +1s

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

So we have all 3 patches ready for review (internal reviewbybees process have been addressed): - https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/2624 - https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/2622 - https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/2621 Would be great if somebody else reviews

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > we must include ATH in our weekly release Pipeline. It should > have caught all issues we see. Confirmed that ATH would have caught JENKINS-39555, since the symptoms are so severe. In general though ATH only covers a

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

+1 - needs an out of order release. This causes 2 major breakages. A small aspect of JENKINS-39404 is responsible for JENKINS-39555, which badly breaks the whole pipeline plugin suite (and goodness knows what else). I have a fix for that which works, but am ensuring it doesn't have side

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

I'm looking into JENKINS-39555 now -- for some reason the usual JIRA notification wasn't delivered. On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 1:11:19 PM UTC-5, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Hi, > > According to my previous experience > , I >

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

Yes, JENKINS-39555 is a must-have. Hopefully your ongoing triangulation will find a hotfix for it. In general, we must include ATH in our weekly release Pipeline. It should have caught all issues we see. понедельник, 7 ноября 2016 г.,

Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

Hi, According to my previous experience , I assume that nobody in this list cares about the Weekly releases. And you're doing right, LTS is the only way to get enough stability. But I want to try again and to propose

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

+1 for an additional release (+2 to use LTS in production :-P) On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi, > > According to my previous experience > , I > assume that nobody in this list

Re: Proposal: Out-of-order weekly release? Just another attempt

> On 07.11.2016, at 19:11, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > What do you think about it? There's also JENKINS-39555. 2.30 without a fix for that seems pointless. Screwing up a weekly due to a big change once in a while happens, but we should work towards making 2.30 not suck,