Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2015-01-15 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com wrote: On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 4:06:34 PM UTC-5, LesMikesell wrote: b1=build( some_job) b2=build( some_other_job, REVISION: b1.build.properties.envVars[SVN_REVISION] ) (where REVISION is a job parameter, expanded in

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2015-01-15 Thread Jesse Glick
On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 4:06:34 PM UTC-5, LesMikesell wrote: b1=build( some_job) b2=build( some_other_job, REVISION: b1.build.properties.envVars[SVN_REVISION] ) (where REVISION is a job parameter, expanded in the svn URL) Well you can certainly expand variables in the ‘url’

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2015-01-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com wrote: On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 7:16:10 PM UTC-5, LesMikesell wrote: A likely scenario would be to trigger a build from polling svn, then building that same svn revision on several types of nodes - even if subsequent

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2015-01-08 Thread Jesse Glick
On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 7:16:10 PM UTC-5, LesMikesell wrote: A likely scenario would be to trigger a build from polling svn, then building that same svn revision on several types of nodes - even if subsequent commits are done to the repository Covered by:

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2015-01-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com wrote: Does this have to be different from build-flow where you could pick up SVN_REVISION and pass it into subsequent builds I am not very familiar with the build-flow plugin and have not heard of such an idiom.

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2015-01-08 Thread Jesse Glick
On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 12:38:30 PM UTC-5, LesMikesell wrote: Does this have to be different from build-flow where you could pick up SVN_REVISION and pass it into subsequent builds I am not very familiar with the build-flow plugin and have not heard of such an idiom.

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2015-01-07 Thread Jesse Glick
On Friday, December 19, 2014 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, LesMikesell wrote: Is there a way to make [unartifact] address artifacts from build (other_job) steps https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-24887 or track their svn revisions and build numbers? Not quite sure what you are getting at

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2015-01-07 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com wrote: On Friday, December 19, 2014 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, LesMikesell wrote: Is there a way to make [unartifact] address artifacts from build (other_job) steps https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-24887 or track their

Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2014-12-19 Thread Les Mikesell
If I create a workflow with multiple node {} operations and have step([$class: 'ArtifactArchiver', artifacts: '**/something/*.something', fingerprint: true]) inside more than one, what is supposed to happen to duplicates? I suppose I should try this myself instead of asking, but I haven't gotten

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2014-12-19 Thread James Nord
On 19/12/2014 16:47, Les Mikesell wrote: If I create a workflow with multiple node {} operations and have step([$class: 'ArtifactArchiver', artifacts: '**/something/*.something', fingerprint: true]) inside more than one, what is supposed to happen to duplicates? No idea - I suggest a suck it

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2014-12-19 Thread James Nord
On 19/12/2014 16:53, James Nord wrote: On 19/12/2014 16:47, Les Mikesell wrote: If I create a workflow with multiple node {} operations and have step([$class: 'ArtifactArchiver', artifacts: '**/something/*.something', fingerprint: true]) inside more than one, what is supposed to happen to

Re: Workflow and ArtifactArchiver?

2014-12-19 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:56 AM, James Nord te...@teilo.net wrote: Also, is there a way for subsequent node{} operations to retrieve the artifacts already archived by previous other nodes within the same workflow build? unarchive is your friend. - although that name does make it sound