Re: JESS: Debugger

2005-11-17 Thread Alan Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Jeffrey Davine wrote: I'll do the research, but as a general matter, do you think the Jess API exposes enough information (particularly concerning the rete tokens) so that I could write such a tool? Alan's more optimistic, but I myself don't think this can

RE: JESS: Debugger

2005-11-17 Thread Jeffrey Davine
Subject: Re: JESS: Debugger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Jeffrey Davine wrote: I'll do the research, but as a general matter, do you think the Jess API exposes enough information (particularly concerning the rete tokens) so that I could write such a tool? Alan's more optimistic, but I

FW: JESS: Debugger

2005-11-16 Thread Jeffrey Davine
To: jess-users@sandia.gov Subject: JESS: Debugger Does Jess have a built-in facility to browse rules? By that I mean a way to check, for any rule, which if any facts match patterns in the rule (showing how the fact is bound to the pattern) and whether there are joins for each pattern? Also

Re: FW: JESS: Debugger

2005-11-16 Thread Alan Moore
PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey Davine *Sent:* Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:48 AM *To:* jess-users@sandia.gov *Subject:* JESS: Debugger Does Jess have a built-in facility to browse rules? By that I mean a way to check, for any rule, which if any facts match patterns in the rule (showing

RE: FW: JESS: Debugger

2005-11-16 Thread Jeffrey Davine
-users@sandia.gov Subject: Re: FW: JESS: Debugger Jeffrey, I created a debugger quite a few years back (Jess version 4.xx) that I have not maintained. I'd have to locate the media it is archived onto but I've been wanting to resurrect it. It didn't do exactly what you want and it was pretty

Re: JESS: Debugger

2005-11-16 Thread ejfried
I think Jeffrey Davine wrote: I'll do the research, but as a general matter, do you think the Jess API exposes enough information (particularly concerning the rete tokens) so that I could write such a tool? Alan's more optimistic, but I myself don't think this can really be done at the level