Ernest:
All I can say to this is, "A M E N ! ! !" On one of my projects I had a young Java
programmer (six months of Java and two months of Rules) who absolutely insisted that
it was OK to change an object outside of the rules, even though manufacture manuals
and manufacturer tech support (and Dr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a icrit :
> > But using XML would help me to have :
> > . a XML black box with predefined entries
>
> Not sure what this one means.
I meant the rule engine would be seen from the outside system as a
black-box
exchanging data using XML-format.
> > . as XML standards (RuleML) a
I think Bonnet Emmanuel wrote:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
>
> My input and output are Java Objects.
> So Java path should be the obvious choice.
>
> But using XML would help me to have :
> . a XML black box with predefined entries
Not sure what this one means.
> . a
Jack Kerkhof a icrit :
> Hi Bonnet,
>
> Your question is pretty wide open and will likely depend as much on the
> context of this application as internal representation. If your source inputs
> and outputs really are java applications, then the first makes sense.
> Otherwise, there undoubtably wil
Bonnet Emmanuel wrote:
Jay Han a icrit :
Is your application standalone or does it work in a network eg
client/server fashion?
It will be on the server-side of a App Server application.
Sounds interesting. Have you decided on what kind of appserver to use?
I guess g
Jay Han a icrit :
> >
> Is your application standalone or does it work in a network eg
> client/server fashion?
It will be on the server-side of a App Server application.
Emmanuel
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe j
Bonnet Emmanuel wrote:
Hi,
I am on the process of trying Jess with a Java application with its own
model.
I have a design Issue, right now I have 2 choices :
1) use the JavaBean capabilities of Jess
-> in : JavaObjects
-> middle : rule engine on Java Objects
-> out: Java Object
Hi Bonnet,
Your question is pretty wide open and will likely depend as much on the
context of this application as internal representation. If your source inputs
and outputs really are java applications, then the first makes sense.
Otherwise, there undoubtably will be some additional context that t
Hi,
I am on the process of trying Jess with a Java application with its own
model.
I have a design Issue, right now I have 2 choices :
1) use the JavaBean capabilities of Jess
-> in : JavaObjects
-> middle : rule engine on Java Objects
-> out: Java Objects
2) use Jess as a "XML
