JESS: Jess and Java 2

2001-03-06 Thread ejfried
Hi Folks, The 6.0a4 release is drawing nigh (should go out by this Friday.) My current working version requires Java 2. I know we've talked about this before, but given that it's now 2001, and Jess 6 final won't be out for some time yet, what's the consensus on requiring Java 2? - Is it OK?

RE: JESS: Jess and Java 2

2001-03-06 Thread Surdu, J. MAJ EECS
I agree. Go to Java 2. = Major John R. "Buck" Surdu, Ph.D. Phone: (845) 938-2407 Asst. Prof. and Sr. Researcher, USMA Fax: 938-3807 DSN 688 Info. Tech. Ops Ctr., Dept. of EECSEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JESS: Jess and Java 2

2001-03-06 Thread David E. Young
"Ernest" == ejfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ernest My current working version requires Java 2. I know we've Ernest talked about this before, but given that it's now 2001, and Ernest Jess 6 final won't be out for some time yet, what's the Ernest consensus on requiring Java 2... I think

Re: JESS: Jess and Java 2

2001-03-06 Thread Mark Lilly
I concur. +1 Go for supporting Java 2, and we take whatever lumps there will be. Eventually, some of the Java 1.0/1.1 libraries will be deprecated, so best to address modernity now. Thanks! mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks, The 6.0a4 release is drawing nigh (should go out by this

Re: JESS: Jess and Java 2

2001-03-06 Thread Eric Widhalm
No sense in dragging it out. Require Java 2. As long as the previous versions are still available, no one should be hung out to dry. At 02:25 PM 3/6/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks, The 6.0a4 release is drawing nigh (should go out by this Friday.) My current working version requires

RE: JESS: Jess and Java 2

2001-03-06 Thread Pelton, Gary
Title: RE: JESS: Jess and Java 2 I'm a little concerned because I believe Java 2 means that Jess won't work on the Mac anymore.

Re: JESS: Jess and Java 2

2001-03-06 Thread Carl Burke
"Pelton, Gary" wrote: I'm a little concerned because I believe Java 2 means that Jess won't work on the Mac anymore. AFAIK there is a Java 2 beta for Mac OS X, but otherwise you're probably right. I'm not a Mac expert, but I've been looking for Java implementations for Mac to support a

JESS: fired in wrong order!

2001-03-06 Thread Sébastien Darveau
Why does the last rule is fired but not the first one (rule-1 will fire if I remove rule-2) ? (assert (f1 4 6 1 4 1 nil)) (assert (f2 -7 0 4 9)) (deffunction same-name (?n1 ?n2)(if (eq (mod ?n1 7) (mod ?n2 7)) then true else false)) (defrulerule-1(f1 ?n1 ?n2 ?n3 ? ? ?)(f2 ?bc ?tc

Re: JESS: fired in wrong order!

2001-03-06 Thread ejfried
These are messy rules, so I don't really know what you expect from them, but I can tell you that under Jess 6.0a3, rule-1 fires and rule-2 does not. I don't know what version of Jess you're using, but if you tell me perhaps I can explain your observation. I think

JESS: ART*Enterprise

2001-03-06 Thread Mark Lilly
Hi, Has anyone used ART*Enterprise from Brightware (used to be Inference Corp.)? It sounds intriguing: http://www.brightware.com/solutions/custartent.html Thoughts or comments? I'm looking for an IDE and for a Knowledge Aquisition and Modeling tool. Thanks, mark

RE: JESS: ART*Enterprise

2001-03-06 Thread EXT-Scarlett, Brad
While I've not used this specific tool from BrightWare, I have been exposed to their Case-Based Reasoning Inference engine, which I find very good. I could then extend that to say that ART is worth delving into. FWIW... b. -Original Message- From: Mark Lilly

JESS: set-fact-duplication TRUE

2001-03-06 Thread Matt Bishop
I use this quite a bit as my rule engine "morphs" data in stages; I have a bunch of prototypical objects created according to one set of rules. Another set of rules fire on these prototypical objects and individualizes them according to their rules. Not having a duplicate fact capability will

Re: JESS: ART*Enterprise

2001-03-06 Thread Mark Lilly
It appears that this is now part of Mindbox: http://www.mindbox.com/solutions/products.shtml. Thanks Andrew for the info. Mark Mark Lilly wrote: Hi, Has anyone used ART*Enterprise from Brightware (used to be Inference Corp.)? It sounds intriguing:

JESS: Re: ART*Enterprise

2001-03-06 Thread Bob Orchard
We've used A*E quite extensively. It is good but has become quite expensive since we initially started using it. I believe it now costs in the order of 10's of thousands of dollars plus royalties for distribution. We haven't had a new release sent to us for well over a year (perhaps 2) even

JESS: RE: Copying of Rete objects

2001-03-06 Thread chinnaswamy gounder
Hi All, I have two questions that needs clarrification: 1. Is it possible to do copies of Rete object after the rules are loaded by inplementing Serializable interface? 2. If I instantiate a Rete object, r , can I put a rule first and its related fact later seperately. e.g

Re: JESS: RE: Copying of Rete objects

2001-03-06 Thread ejfried
I think chinnaswamy gounder wrote: Hi All, I have two questions that needs clarrification: 1. Is it possible to do copies of Rete object after the rules are loaded by inplementing Serializable interface? If you really, really want to make copies of a Rete object, then you can do