Re: JESS: Using a rule engine for plan recognition

2006-02-14 Thread Jonathan Sewall
Back to a month-old topic, herewith some more information.  Back then I asked   1) whether others have suggestions for implementing backtracking in Jess and   2) whether it would be appropriate to make Activation.setInactive() public. Thanks again for your replies so far.  Anyone who reads al

Re: JESS: Using a rule engine for plan recognition

2006-01-13 Thread ejfried
I think Jonathan Sewall wrote: > > 2. I'd ask that jess.Activation.setInactive(boolean) be made public. We > currently use selective firing of Activation instances from the agenda. > For that I employ Rete.run(1) to fire one Activation at a time and > Activation.setInactive() to deactivate tho

RE: JESS: Using a rule engine for plan recognition

2006-01-13 Thread Martijn Tromm
Actually, by selecting the activations that you want to fire yourself makes a rule-engine useless. If you can solve your problem algorithmically then you don't need a rule-engine. By letting the rule-engine decide what order to impose on the rule firings you can dynamically build the search tree. Y