Re: [vote] Portlet API

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is useful to provide a little summary of the current state of the discussion. I tried to give a neutral summary on each item, followed by my opinion. Point 1: Should JetSpeed require portlets to produce full documents ? Producing full documents

Re: [vote] Portlet API

At 23:56 13/02/2001 +0100, you wrote: I think it is useful to provide a little summary of the current state of the discussion. I tried to give a neutral summary on each item, followed by my opinion. Thomas, I think it's a very good summary of the issues. I have just 2 things to add/modify to

Re: CVS - how to install from it?

John Menke wrote: I have a problem with the 1.3a distribution ("Couldn't process URL: /ocs/local.ocs") I found a message from ingo shuster stating I could fix it with the files in the CVS directory. How to do an upgrade of the 1.3a distribution with the files from the CVS. If the

Re: RES: BasePeer.initTableSchema(TABLE): null

Anderson dos Santos wrote: Hi, i realy need your help. I acess mail list and try many sugest (ie include jdbc drive in enviroment path), but not resolved. []'s Sorry, I don't know very much about the database setup. I think your jdbc driver should be in the webapp/WEB-INF/lib dir, to

Changing java.util.Dictionary -- java.util.Map in some places

I have some files changed, and I doubt to commit or not. I started changing Dictionary to Map, because Dictionary has a few problems: - it is an abstract class, but not comprehensive enough for what I needed. (it lacks methods like putAll(Map) ) - casting it to Hashtable defeats all the

Next Release

Hi! Can anyone tell me the proposed date of the next release of a stable version of Jetspeed? Thanks, Sarah -- -- To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search:

AW: [vote] Portlet API

When we are talking about a general-purpose portlet-api, did you already look into Oracle 9iAS Portal? http://www.oracle.com/portals/index.html?intro.html or http://portalstudio.oracle.com/ They just do "recommendations" as in the current jetspeed implementation: * Use standard HTML. The

Re: [vote] Portlet API - Compromise

Hi, I'm meanwhile convinced, that this discussion won't lead to a consensus, if each of us keeps defending his view on a technical level. However, I really like to find a compromise that everybody can agree on. On a meta level of this discussion, I can see the point that it would hurt the

Framework extensions

Hi everybody - sorry for the longposting -: We are a group of students taking part in a course focused on web applicationdevelopment. We've been working on/with jetspeed for some time now, focusingon extending the possibilities in portlet development. We have a workingimplementation of our

Re: servlet to portlet

David Sean Taylor wrote: try this link, it covers the basic steps to writing a portlet http://www.bluesunrise.com/jetspeed/PortletHowTo.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Reddy, Ayndla Srinivas Sent: Tuesday, February 13,

Re: BasePeer.initTableSchema(TABLE): null

Anderson dos Santos wrote: Hi, i have a problem with database connection using mySQL, with HyperSonic works fine, see my turbine resource properties: # D A T A B A S E S E T T I N G S #Works fine #database.default.driver=org.hsql.jdbcDriver

Re: [vote] Portlet API

Santiago Gala wrote: Do you mean that javax.servlet.* is more standard than javax.xml.* (Trax and Jaxp)? What I am trying to point out is that it is not good for a standard Java API depend on other Java APIs that are not part of the JDK classes. If you look at javax.servlet for example, it

Re: [vote] Portlet API

Raphael Luta wrote: At 23:56 13/02/2001 +0100, you wrote: I think it is useful to provide a little summary of the current state of the discussion. I tried to give a neutral summary on each item, followed by my opinion. Thomas, I think it's a very good summary of the issues. I have

RE: Framework extensions

cool! -Original Message-From: Stefan Reich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 7:09 AMTo: JetSpeedCc: Jens Birger Hahn; Stefan WesterfeldSubject: Framework extensions Hi everybody - sorry for the longposting -: We are a group of students

RE: (Possible) Demise of Hypersonic SQL

At 06:34 13/02/01, you wrote: I think we should stick to HypersonicSQL as the default database for the sample webapp bundled with Jetspeed because it's very convenient. Jetspeed supports any database Turbine supports so we don't have any real dependency on HypersonicSQL. +1

Re: Next Release

on 2/14/01 5:55 AM, "Sarah Arnott" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Can anyone tell me the proposed date of the next release of a stable version of Jetspeed? Thanks, Sarah When it is ready. -jon -- If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take your pain to new levels.

RE: Framework extensions

Great Ideas! I have been pondering some of those issues also. Mike Warne Pihana Pacific, Inc. -Original Message-From: Stefan Reich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 7:09 AMTo: JetSpeedCc: Jens Birger Hahn; Stefan WesterfeldSubject: Framework