Re: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
The rules here is that we avoid HEAD breakage at all costs even when the project is not deemed stable yet by our release numbering. CVS HEAD should always compile and work as well as possible for a product under development. If you encounter any issue building Jestpeed 1 or 2 CVS HEAD, don't hesitate to raise the issue, it will get fixed ASAP. Well. I checked it first out, then tried to compile it and there was some problems with missing files. I updated the project only 15 minutes from original checkout and there were some new files that were missing during compilation. It was just that i managed to check out the project when there was comming in progress. CVS is not atomic and it causes problems like this sometimes. After update it worked just great and is still running without interruption. -- Jouni Rajala - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
I concur with Raphaël. I have a project that is based on J2 and it is currently running in a production environment. -scott -Original Message- From: Raphaël Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 5:46 AM To: Jetspeed Users List Subject: Re: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ?? Hampton, Thomas wrote: I'm currently using Jetspeed 1.5 and I would like to upgrade to Jetspeed 2 as soon as it is reasonable to do so. But I can't tell from the Jetspeed 2 website what the current status is. Is Jetspeed 2 released ? When will it be released ? Jetspeed 2 has a M1 release available, with a M2 release soon. Is the 'M1' release a production release or is it Alfa or Beta ? Formally, it's an alpha release because M1 is not feature complete compared to the target feature list of J2 and some of the design of J2 may be changed until we reach a 1.0 status. (for example, there's a huge effort underway to streamline the auto-deployment code). Now, even in its current status, J2 is very useable for development work if you want a pure, lean and mean, portal server. If what you need is just JSR168 support in a full-featured stable portal, consider using Jetspeed 1 with Fusion. Currently, you'll need to get the current CVS for this since Jetspeed 1.6 is not out yet (should be formally released soon). -- Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java http://portals.apache.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
Jouni Rajala wrote: If you don't need fancy portlets for modifying your portal from portal itself, Jetspeed-2 already works just fine. Only problem is that you need to modify all the xml files and deploy your portlets directly in jetspeed deployment directory with other tools. A portlet selector (customizer) will be included in M2. I recently wrote a prototype popup portlet selector with satisfying results. -- David Sean Taylor Bluesunrise Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] [office] +01 707 773-4646 [mobile] +01 707 529 9194 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
That's great news. We(so are the many JS1.5 users, I hope) are so used to the deployment using the customizer in JS1.5 since it is quite handy. Hema On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:28:57 -0800, David Sean Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A portlet selector (customizer) will be included in M2. I recently wrote a prototype popup portlet selector with satisfying results. -- David Sean Taylor Bluesunrise Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] [office] +01 707 773-4646 [mobile] +01 707 529 9194 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ~~ Hema Menon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
Mike R. wrote: snip Now, even in its current status, J2 is very useable for development work if you want a pure, lean and mean, portal server. If what you need is just JSR168 support in a full-featured stable portal, consider using Jetspeed 1 with Fusion. Currently, you'll need to get the current CVS for this since Jetspeed 1.6 is not out yet (should be formally released soon). Raphaël - hoping you can help out here - which version would you recommend for a project with the following requirements? - JSR 168 compliance - minimal inter portlet communication (most like done via PortletSession) - basic rendering requirements; using RequestDispatcher to JSPs with embedded XSLT - needs to be robust, being used in a demo in 1 month. J2 should be more than stable enough to handle theses requirements. Also note that the JSR168 support in Jetspeed 1.6 will actually be provided through Fusion... which embeds a Jetspeed 2 instance inside Jetspeed 1 ! -- Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java http://portals.apache.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
Raphaël - hoping you can help out here - which version would you recommend for a project with the following requirements? - JSR 168 compliance Works ok. - minimal inter portlet communication (most like done via PortletSession) Works ok. - basic rendering requirements; using RequestDispatcher to JSPs with embedded XSLT Don't know about this. - needs to be robust, being used in a demo in 1 month. I have demo system with 1 month continuous uptime and it is checked out from cvs/HEAD. That tells you something about how stabe it is currently. Of course with bit bad luck you manage to check out something that does not work from HEAD like me at first time. I just updated the project again and noticed there was cvs comming just going on when i checked out. So there was incomplete version in. If you don't need fancy portlets for modifying your portal from portal itself, Jetspeed-2 already works just fine. Only problem is that you need to modify all the xml files and deploy your portlets directly in jetspeed deployment directory with other tools. On some pages I have experienced problems getting into edit mode. You need to minimize/maximize and then restore the portlet to get edit mode icon to appear. Bit annoying but I am sure they get it fixed before final version. -- Jouni Rajala - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
Le 21 mars 05, à 07:58, Jouni Rajala a écrit : Raphaël - hoping you can help out here - which version would you recommend for a project with the following requirements? - JSR 168 compliance Works ok. - minimal inter portlet communication (most like done via PortletSession) Works ok. - basic rendering requirements; using RequestDispatcher to JSPs with embedded XSLT Don't know about this. - needs to be robust, being used in a demo in 1 month. I have demo system with 1 month continuous uptime and it is checked out from cvs/HEAD. That tells you something about how stabe it is currently. Of course with bit bad luck you manage to check out something that does not work from HEAD like me at first time. I just updated the project again and noticed there was cvs comming just going on when i checked out. So there was incomplete version in. The rules here is that we avoid HEAD breakage at all costs even when the project is not deemed stable yet by our release numbering. CVS HEAD should always compile and work as well as possible for a product under development. If you encounter any issue building Jestpeed 1 or 2 CVS HEAD, don't hesitate to raise the issue, it will get fixed ASAP. -- Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Jetspeed - Enterprise Portal in Java http://portals.apache.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
Raphaël Luta wrote: Hampton, Thomas wrote: I'm currently using Jetspeed 1.5 and I would like to upgrade to Jetspeed 2 as soon as it is reasonable to do so. But I can't tell from the Jetspeed 2 website what the current status is. Is Jetspeed 2 released ? When will it be released ? Jetspeed 2 has a M1 release available, with a M2 release soon. Is the 'M1' release a production release or is it Alfa or Beta ? Formally, it's an alpha release because M1 is not feature complete compared to the target feature list of J2 and some of the design of J2 may be changed until we reach a 1.0 status. (for example, there's a huge effort underway to streamline the auto-deployment code). Now, even in its current status, J2 is very useable for development work if you want a pure, lean and mean, portal server. If what you need is just JSR168 support in a full-featured stable portal, consider using Jetspeed 1 with Fusion. Currently, you'll need to get the current CVS for this since Jetspeed 1.6 is not out yet (should be formally released soon). Raphaël - hoping you can help out here - which version would you recommend for a project with the following requirements? - JSR 168 compliance - minimal inter portlet communication (most like done via PortletSession) - basic rendering requirements; using RequestDispatcher to JSPs with embedded XSLT - needs to be robust, being used in a demo in 1 month. Thanks. Mike R. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the Status of Jetspeed 2 ??
I'm currently using Jetspeed 1.5 and I would like to upgrade to Jetspeed 2 as soon as it is reasonable to do so. But I can't tell from the Jetspeed 2 website what the current status is. Is Jetspeed 2 released ? When will it be released ? Is the 'M1' release a production release or is it Alfa or Beta ? Thanks, Tom
