Re: [jffnms-users] poller speed

2006-04-23 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:31:50PM -0400, Tim Jackson wrote: > I'd love to see JFFNMS with some faster pollers, perhaps something not > written in PHP? I know the Cacti guys moved away from PHP pollers > because of this. I've considered doing just that, changing the poller to C. The problem is th

Re: [jffnms-users] poller speed

2006-04-21 Thread Jason Lavoie
On 04/21, Jason Lavoie wrote: > To start, I've run autodiscovery against one of our routers, a cisco > 6500, and it produces 599 interfaces. poller2.php never completes (it > just times out), and poller.php takes > 5 minutes to poll just that one > host: > > 10:20:44 : H 2 : Poller End, Total

Re: [jffnms-users] poller speed

2006-04-21 Thread Doug Veldhuisen
I have been reading this thread with interest.  I too had an issue with the poller taking a fair amount of time.  Granted I probably am not running near as much as some of you, but it seems if you use the poller2 instead of the old poller, things do run better. I am posting my crontab of what I

Re: [jffnms-users] poller speed

2006-04-21 Thread Jason Lavoie
On 04/21, Kory wrote: > I ran into a similar problem but found that (in my situation) that the > SNMP_PING function was the problem. I noticed that started happening too, when I entered a rwcommunity for the device. In pollers/cisco_snmp_ping_start.php: if (($peer) && ($host_ip) && ($rw_

RE: [jffnms-users] poller speed

2006-04-21 Thread Kory
gt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Jackson > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:32 AM > To: Leigh Porter > Cc: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] poller speed > > We used to run into similar issues. We've actually moved away from > JFFNMS because

Re: [jffnms-users] poller speed

2006-04-21 Thread Tim Jackson
We used to run into similar issues. We've actually moved away from JFFNMS because of performance issues. Our server monitoring 1800 interfaces was running at > 1.0 load averages 24/7. We ended up going another route for NMS. JFFNMS is still the only thing out there with it all built in one solu

Re: [jffnms-users] poller speed

2006-04-21 Thread Leigh Porter
Hiya, I have hosts that have about 300 interfaces and yeah, it takes a while to poll them :) There is a threaded poller but I have not been able to make this work yet. Saying that, I have about 2200 interfaces and my CPU load is at 45 on a duel cpu XEON :( -- Leigh Jason Lavoie wrote: I'

Re: [jffnms-users] Poller speed

2004-07-28 Thread Javier Szyszlican
Michael, I think that most of your performance problems will go away when you convert to linux. We started a new poller system (exp_poller) that is parallel, but it still needs testing. Anyway the current poller is host-parallel and interface-linear. Javier Meyers, Michael wrote: What

Re: [jffnms-users] Poller speed

2004-07-28 Thread Javier Szyszlican
Anang, It will be great if we could see why the poller is taking so long. Can you run it manually and send me the output? Try: cd /op/jffnms/engine /usr/bin/php -q poller.php 2 0 1 0 0 And save all the output. Thanks for still being with us. Javier Anang Syarifudin wrote: Hi Javier, I'm a happy JFF

RE: [jffnms-users] Poller speed

2004-07-28 Thread Meyers, Michael
What I did to work around this is to create multiple pollers that are five minutes apart. We are monitoring over 400 interfaces on one box, and the poller takes about 15 minutes to complete, so I have added (now) 4 pollers. i.e. poller1, poller2, poller3, poller4, etc... Poller1 starts at 12:0