Re: Review Request: 8074428, 8074429, 8074430 jdk.pack200, jdk.jartool, jdk.policytool modules

2015-03-04 Thread Wang Weijun
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 11:25, Mandy Chung wrote: > > > On 3/4/2015 6:55 PM, Wang Weijun wrote: >> I am about to introduce 2 APIs into jdk.dev so that people can call >> functions of keytool and jarsigner directly. > > Are you referring to these 2 RFEs? > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK

Re: Review Request: 8074428, 8074429, 8074430 jdk.pack200, jdk.jartool, jdk.policytool modules

2015-03-04 Thread Mandy Chung
On 3/4/2015 6:55 PM, Wang Weijun wrote: I am about to introduce 2 APIs into jdk.dev so that people can call functions of keytool and jarsigner directly. Are you referring to these 2 RFEs? https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8056174 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058778 We hav

Re: Review Request: 8074428, 8074429, 8074430 jdk.pack200, jdk.jartool, jdk.policytool modules

2015-03-04 Thread Wang Weijun
I am about to introduce 2 APIs into jdk.dev so that people can call functions of keytool and jarsigner directly. So what I am suggesting is - Create jdk.security.util - Move jarsigner, policytool to jdk.security.util - Create the new APIs in this module - Move keytool to jdk.security.util, it's n

Review Request: 8074428, 8074429, 8074430 jdk.pack200, jdk.jartool, jdk.policytool modules

2015-03-04 Thread Mandy Chung
As listed in an open issue in JEP 200: The jdk.dev and jdk.runtime modules contain miscellaneous tools that do not obviously belong to any other module; these modules will eventually be either renamed or refactored. Currently there are jdk.javadoc, jdk.jconsole, jdk.jcmd modules in the JDK that