I see the command line help text has not been updated for the existing
simple options. That is a bug.
-- Jon
On 01/30/2017 04:05 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Nicolai,
The simple answer is "Yes, there will be an easy way to generate
documentation based on accessibility",
and "yes, the
Nicolai,
The simple answer is "Yes, there will be an easy way to generate
documentation based on accessibility",
and "yes, the javadoc tool is module aware".
We've added new options that generalize the existing simple options, so
that you can have detailed
control if you really need it, but
Hi!
There is an interesting question up on StackOverflow, "How does the
Javadoc deal with the visibility of modules in Java 9?".
http://stackoverflow.com/q/41929425/2525313
It asks whether there will be an easy way to generate documentation
based on accessibility?
Next to an actual
Hi all,
chasing a bug on ASM, i've found that the module implementation in the JDK uses
the wrong values for ACC_TRANSITIVE and ACC_STATIC_PHASE,
in the spec [1],
0x0020 (ACC_TRANSITIVE)
0x0040 (ACC_STATIC_PHASE)
but in the implementation [2],
public static final int ACC_TRANSITIVE=
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Doug Simon wrote:
>
>
>> On 30 Jan 2017, at 21:55, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Doug Simon wrote:
>>>
>>> I’ve extended the webrev with that change - please
Changeset: d6eee62a15ca
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-09 14:12 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/d6eee62a15ca
Add @revised and @spec tags for the JPMS specification
! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java
!
Changeset: f3a9335f6f44
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 17:46 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxws/rev/f3a9335f6f44
Added tag jpms-edr for changeset b148ffe87b58
! .hgtags
Changeset: 4c46cd09f7eb
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 18:05 -0800
URL:
Changeset: ff59f4589b3e
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-09 14:12 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/ff59f4589b3e
Add @revised and @spec tags for the JPMS specification
! src/java.compiler/share/classes/javax/lang/model/element/Element.java
!
Changeset: 6bdef88dea24
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 17:46 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/rev/6bdef88dea24
Added tag jpms-edr for changeset 88094de8a4cc
! .hgtags
Changeset: 4692b5e8bfec
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 18:05 -0800
URL:
Changeset: 64bc77a70efe
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 17:46 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/nashorn/rev/64bc77a70efe
Added tag jpms-edr for changeset 9488d434850a
! .hgtags
Changeset: 47d6631559bc
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 18:05 -0800
URL:
Changeset: 8b7a77a3986f
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 17:46 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/hotspot/rev/8b7a77a3986f
Added tag jpms-edr for changeset 8ff4522d2ecb
! .hgtags
Changeset: fb1033843eb0
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 18:05 -0800
URL:
Changeset: c3d7cb8b08da
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 17:46 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxp/rev/c3d7cb8b08da
Added tag jpms-edr for changeset bddea134df23
! .hgtags
Changeset: fa0981755c22
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 18:05 -0800
URL:
Changeset: aa59b6e3002d
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 17:46 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/corba/rev/aa59b6e3002d
Added tag jpms-edr for changeset c7995982569d
! .hgtags
Changeset: 37c94d33c7bf
Author:mr
Date: 2017-01-12 18:05 -0800
URL:
Previously, in JDK 8 and before, javac would use the runtime
bootclasspath if there was explicit setting for the compilation
bootclasspath.
Now, in 9, there is no sense of a bootclasspath, since it has been
superseded by modules and the module graph. But even so, it is
reasonable to ask the
On 30/01/2017 16:25, Hontvári Attila wrote:
Regarding to the reduction of the java.desktop module size:
Has Swing any circular dependency with other java.desktop parts? I
know about only one, Desktop::setDefaultJMenuBar, which is only to be
introduced in Java 9. If that dependency could be
In my mind, proposal 2 (eliminating automobiles) is infinitely preferable
to what we have today.
The one downside as compared to leveraging the existing coordinates
(proposal 1) is that it doesn't do anything to set a best practice in what
good names look like. If nothing else, the maven
Regarding to the reduction of the java.desktop module size:
Has Swing any circular dependency with other java.desktop parts? I know
about only one, Desktop::setDefaultJMenuBar, which is only to be
introduced in Java 9. If that dependency could be broken (by replacing
the parameter type from
So far I haven't commented on automatic modules because while I don't
see them as useful, I also didn't see them as harmful. However this
keeps popping up, so, see inline comments.
On 01/27/2017 08:11 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
[...]
The issue is clear. If I write this:
module
Hi Alan.
>> java -p mods --lomit-modules foo -m bar
> This limits the set of observable modules to `bar` plus the
> transitive closure of `foo`.
Ah, now I get it.
You originally wrote:
> The set of observable modules is the the transitive closure of the
> modules you specify to
Changeset: 6dc3e3aa8f57
Author:alanb
Date: 2017-01-30 12:00 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/6dc3e3aa8f57
Module path can ignore non-modules in module directories
! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/module/ModuleFinder.java
!
As far as i know, no pending changes !
and given how close we are from the end (the spec is in EDR stage), i hope that
the classfile format is in its final version.
cheers,
Rémi
> De: "Roman Shevchenko"
> À: "Alan Bateman" , "Remi
Hi,
are there any pending changes to the class file format? Looking forward to the
Alpha 2 release :)
> On 11 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 11/12/2016 13:05, Remi Forax wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>> if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw
22 matches
Mail list logo