> On 3 Dec 2021, at 15:33, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2021 13:39, Michał Kłeczek wrote:
>> Am I missing something?
>>
> I think you understand it correctly. The notion of multi-parent configuration
> and layers is something that was added for those that were focused on interop
> with
> On 3 Dec 2021, at 14:39, Michał Kłeczek wrote:
>
>
> 2. Is there a way to handle it today?
> (Ab)using transitive dependencies might work - I could introduce artificial
> module M ---(transitive)-->Y2 and make Z require M (so that resolution would
> replace Y1 found by DFS with Y2
On 03/12/2021 13:39, Michał Kłeczek wrote:
Am I missing something?
I think you understand it correctly. The notion of multi-parent
configuration and layers is something that was added for those that were
focused on interop with other class loader based systems. It was tracked
as issue
Hi All,
During my work on lazy loading of modules I stumbled upon the following
possible dependency graph that I would like to handle:
Y1 X2
^ ^
| |
(non-transitive)(non-transitive)
| |
|
