Alan Bateman wrote on 01/05/2017 06:23:46 AM:
> I'm curious what the typical use-case is for this. Most of time that
> I've seen discussions on fragments then it was about adding i18n
> resources but there are other ways to do that sort of thing (i18n
> bundles can be deployed as service provide
On 04/01/2017 15:15, Thomas Watson wrote:
:
In theory fragments can be dynamically attached to an already resolved
host (module) which implies that we need to be able to dynamically add
packages to the existing host module. With that in mind, if we wanted
to support dynamic attachment of fr
> In some cases we have the full contents, but in other cases we allow
> dynamic deployment contents to be updated or added at run time (mostly
> for development purposes but it can be practical and useful to add
> contents at run time as well in certain cases). Because of the way that
> our
On 01/04/2017 08:26 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 04/01/2017 14:21, David M. Lloyd wrote:
We need the ability to add content to a module after it is defined to
support our existing deployment architecture. Is there a material
problem with having this feature, other than transgressing your sense
o
On 04/01/2017 14:21, David M. Lloyd wrote:
We need the ability to add content to a module after it is defined to
support our existing deployment architecture. Is there a material
problem with having this feature, other than transgressing your sense
of "should"?
Can you expand a bit on this? I
3 Janvier 2017 21:45:04
Objet: Proposed enhancement to Layer API
This is a proposed enhancement to the Layer API, a sibling to the
discussion around #NonHierarchicalLayers going on in the JPMS spec list.
While discussion is ongoing, I want to ensure that there is a "real"
patch
jigsaw-dev"
> Envoyé: Mardi 3 Janvier 2017 21:45:04
> Objet: Proposed enhancement to Layer API
> This is a proposed enhancement to the Layer API, a sibling to the
> discussion around #NonHierarchicalLayers going on in the JPMS spec list.
> While discussion is ongoing, I want
This is a proposed enhancement to the Layer API, a sibling to the
discussion around #NonHierarchicalLayers going on in the JPMS spec list.
While discussion is ongoing, I want to ensure that there is a "real"
patch somewhere out in the public that can be referenced and discussed.
Essentially t
