On 09/12/2016 14:09, Remi Forax wrote:
Thanks Alan,
so I withdraw my snarky comment.
Not a problem. There is cleanup to be done in several areas, this is
one. For the short term then we need to get the implementation aligned
with the proposals in the JSR and then get the cleanup done before ZB
I'll work with Alan to get these changes re-based on top of
the refactoring in jake. Consider this review request withdrawn.
-Chris.
On 09/12/16 14:09, Remi Forax wrote:
Thanks Alan,
so I withdraw my snarky comment.
Rémi
On December 9, 2016 12:25:19 PM GMT+01:00, Alan Bateman
wrote:
On 08
Thanks Alan,
so I withdraw my snarky comment.
Rémi
On December 9, 2016 12:25:19 PM GMT+01:00, Alan Bateman
wrote:
>On 08/12/2016 14:41, Remi Forax wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>> this patch is rather ugly.
>> Patching the ModuleDescriptor is not a good idea, maybe it's means
>that we need a system of me
On 08/12/2016 14:41, Remi Forax wrote:
Chris,
this patch is rather ugly.
Patching the ModuleDescriptor is not a good idea, maybe it's means that we need
a system of metadata associated with a ModuleDescriptor,
the hash of a module (which is not part of the module spec but the OpenJDK
implement
gt;
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Chris Hegarty"
>> À: "jigsaw-dev"
>> Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Décembre 2016 14:49:38
>> Objet: RFR [9] 8170859 : Run time and tool support for ModuleResolution
>
>> This is a review request for the link time
adata.
regards,
Rémi
- Mail original -
> De: "Chris Hegarty"
> À: "jigsaw-dev"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Décembre 2016 14:49:38
> Objet: RFR [9] 8170859 : Run time and tool support for ModuleResolution
> This is a review request for the link time and run tim
This is a review request for the link time and run time support for
the mechanism to support incubator modules [1]. More specifically,
the addition of options to the jmod and jar tools to pass through the
relevant values, as per JEP 11, and support for these in the form
of a new ModuleResolution a
