Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 12/11/2015 14:41, Wang Weijun wrote: make/Images.gmk uses both JDK_COMPACTn and JRE_COMPACTn. Should it be only JRE_COMPACTn? Yes, Images.gmk should be more consistent in the naming of its variables. -Alan

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 11/11/2015 11:07, Wang Weijun wrote: : I'm prototyping in jake and the change is src/java.base/share/classes/module-info.java: exports sun.security.util to +jdk.security.cert, exports sun.security.x509 to +jdk.security.cert,

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

> On Nov 11, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > > On 11/11/2015 03:20, Wang Weijun wrote: >> Ping again. >> >> Will the future JRE only include java.se? In other words, what will the >> java.com download for non-developers contain? >> > This isn't really a

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 11/11/2015 09:54, Wang Weijun wrote: : Here comes the question: How do I request a new module to be included in it? The CCC for the new module/API? Can you cc jigsaw-dev on the changes to modules.xml? modules.xml is the temporary document that we have in JDK 9 to define the modular

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 11/11/2015 03:20, Wang Weijun wrote: Ping again. Will the future JRE only include java.se? In other words, what will the java.com download for non-developers contain? This isn't really a quick for here. However, in your build environment then use jre/bin/java -listmods to see the full

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

> On Nov 11, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 11/11/2015 09:54, Wang Weijun wrote: >> : >> >> Here comes the question: How do I request a new module to be included in it? >> The CCC for the new module/API? >> > Can you cc jigsaw-dev on the changes to

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

Ping again. Will the future JRE only include java.se? In other words, what will the java.com download for non-developers contain? Thanks Max > On Nov 5, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Wang Weijun wrote: > > I was talking with Vincent off the list, but it seems better to be back.

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 30.10.2015 16:29, Vincent Privat wrote: Hi, - Is it expected to allow external people to have the possibility to subscribe to JDK issues? See http://robilad.livejournal.com/139637.html cheers, dalibor topic -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone:

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 30/10/2015 15:29, Vincent Privat wrote: : - Some issues didn't make it to the public JIRA and remained in the private bug database. Can we please have more information on them (why have they apparently been rejected)? The incident numbers are JI-9009025, JI-9010791, JI-9009449, JI-9008003.

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 31/10/2015 13:40, Vincent Privat wrote: Hi Alan, Thanks a lot for your answers and guidance. We will follow-up bugs with appropriate mailing lists and attach test cases every time possible. Best regards, Vincent Thanks. So I think from the list of 29 issues then there are only 2 that are

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 30/10/2015 15:29, Vincent Privat wrote: Hi, Following the recent inclusion of JOSM to the Quality Outreach list by the Adoption Group, we have compiled every single Java issue we have encountered, and reported when it was new, for the latest versions of Java, on a single page:

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

Thanks for reporting these issues. > On Oct 30, 2015, at 8:29 AM, Vincent Privat > wrote: > > Concerning Jigsaw: > - We have reported 3 bugs. All made it to the public JIRA: 8138878, > 8140477, 8140481. The second one is a bit problematic for our tests as it >

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 30/10/2015 15:29, Vincent Privat wrote: : Concerning Jigsaw: - We have reported 3 bugs. All made it to the public JIRA: 8138878, 8140477, 8140481. The second one is a bit problematic for our tests as it basically kills our Jenkins instance. I see the two other ones are understood/in

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

On 30.10.2015 18:02, Alan Bateman wrote: On 30/10/2015 15:29, Vincent Privat wrote: > : > > Concerning Jigsaw: > - We have reported 3 bugs. All made it to the public JIRA: 8138878, > 8140477, 8140481. The second one is a bit problematic for our tests as > it basically kills our Jenkins

Re: JOSM feedback on Java 7,8,9, including Jigsaw EA

2015-10-30 18:02 GMT+01:00 Alan Bateman : > > JDK-8138878 seems to be JSOM hacking into private field in > java.awt.Toolkit. It is possible to discuss the issue on awt-dev and > i18n-dev to see if the changing locale scenario is meant to work? > > Yes, this is a hack we