Re: Proposed enhancement to Layer API

2017-01-05 Thread Thomas Watson
Alan Bateman wrote on 01/05/2017 06:23:46 AM: > I'm curious what the typical use-case is for this. Most of time that > I've seen discussions on fragments then it was about adding i18n > resources but there are other ways to do that sort of thing (i18n > bundles can be deployed as service provide

Re: Proposed enhancement to Layer API

2017-01-05 Thread Alan Bateman
On 04/01/2017 15:15, Thomas Watson wrote: : In theory fragments can be dynamically attached to an already resolved host (module) which implies that we need to be able to dynamically add packages to the existing host module. With that in mind, if we wanted to support dynamic attachment of fr

Re: Proposed enhancement to Layer API

2017-01-04 Thread Thomas Watson
> In some cases we have the full contents, but in other cases we allow > dynamic deployment contents to be updated or added at run time (mostly > for development purposes but it can be practical and useful to add > contents at run time as well in certain cases). Because of the way that > our

Re: Proposed enhancement to Layer API

2017-01-04 Thread David M. Lloyd
On 01/04/2017 08:26 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 04/01/2017 14:21, David M. Lloyd wrote: We need the ability to add content to a module after it is defined to support our existing deployment architecture. Is there a material problem with having this feature, other than transgressing your sense o

Re: Proposed enhancement to Layer API

2017-01-04 Thread Alan Bateman
On 04/01/2017 14:21, David M. Lloyd wrote: We need the ability to add content to a module after it is defined to support our existing deployment architecture. Is there a material problem with having this feature, other than transgressing your sense of "should"? Can you expand a bit on this? I

Re: Proposed enhancement to Layer API

2017-01-04 Thread David M. Lloyd
We need the ability to add content to a module after it is defined to support our existing deployment architecture. Is there a material problem with having this feature, other than transgressing your sense of "should"? On 01/03/2017 05:33 PM, Remi Forax wrote: I agree with all the proposed m

Re: Proposed enhancement to Layer API

2017-01-03 Thread Remi Forax
I agree with all the proposed methods but the one that add a package, in my opinion, a package is part of what structurally define a module, it should not be possible to add it after the resolution algorithm. Rémi - Mail original - > De: "David M. Lloyd" > À: "jigsaw-dev" > Envoyé: Ma