Re: java.beans package in java.desktop module

2018-03-07 Thread Remi Forax
- Mail original - > De: "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@joda.org> > À: "jigsaw-dev" <jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Mars 2018 13:23:10 > Objet: Re: java.beans package in java.desktop module > What is needed is an ab

Re: java.beans package in java.desktop module

2018-03-07 Thread Stephen Colebourne
andles, so perhaps not using a direct interface. > > Rémi > > - Mail original - >> De: "Guillaume Smet" <guilla...@hibernate.org> >> À: "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@joda.org> >> Cc: "jigsaw-dev" <jigsaw-dev@openjdk.jav

Re: java.beans package in java.desktop module

2018-03-07 Thread Remi Forax
- Mail original - > De: "Guillaume Smet" <guilla...@hibernate.org> > À: "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@joda.org> > Cc: "jigsaw-dev" <jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Mardi 6 Mars 2018 18:45:21 > Objet: Re: java.beans p

Re: java.beans package in java.desktop module

2018-03-06 Thread Guillaume Smet
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > It had been my hope that we might see a replacement for the java.beans > package. I drew up a rough prototype here: > https://github.com/jodastephen/property-alliance > based on previous work in

Re: java.beans package in java.desktop module

2018-03-06 Thread Guillaume Smet
robably be able to get rid of our Introspector usage at some point but the javax.el case is definitely something that's bugging me. > I'm curious why you are bringing it up. Are you looking to deploy on a > run-time image that doesn't have the java.desktop module? > Well, I'm not looking a

Re: java.beans package in java.desktop module

2018-03-06 Thread Alan Bateman
On 06/03/2018 13:52, Guillaume Smet wrote: Hi, (Previously sent via an unsubscribed email address, sorry about that) The java.beans package is part of the java.desktop module which is a bit unfortunate as the package contains quite a few classes useful to manipulate beans and dragging all

Re: java.beans package in java.desktop module

2018-03-06 Thread Stephen Colebourne
On 6 March 2018 at 13:52, Guillaume Smet <guilla...@hibernate.org> wrote: > The java.beans package is part of the java.desktop module which is a bit > unfortunate as the package contains quite a few classes useful to > manipulate beans and dragging all the desktop classes with t

java.beans package in java.desktop module

2018-03-06 Thread Guillaume Smet
Hi, (Previously sent via an unsubscribed email address, sorry about that) The java.beans package is part of the java.desktop module which is a bit unfortunate as the package contains quite a few classes useful to manipulate beans and dragging all the desktop classes with them is far from ideal

Re: java.desktop

2017-01-30 Thread Alan Bateman
On 30/01/2017 16:25, Hontvári Attila wrote: Regarding to the reduction of the java.desktop module size: Has Swing any circular dependency with other java.desktop parts? I know about only one, Desktop::setDefaultJMenuBar, which is only to be introduced in Java 9. If that dependency could

Re: java.desktop

2017-01-30 Thread Hontvári Attila
Regarding to the reduction of the java.desktop module size: Has Swing any circular dependency with other java.desktop parts? I know about only one, Desktop::setDefaultJMenuBar, which is only to be introduced in Java 9. If that dependency could be broken (by replacing the parameter type from

Re: java.desktop

2017-01-21 Thread Alan Bateman
On 21/01/2017 14:00, Michał Zegan wrote: Hi. Is java.desktop now divided in separate parts, or are there plans to do so? Because actually the whole point of your application having no unneeded dependencies is broken if you want java.beans, and suddenly get the whole desktop apis

Re: java.desktop

2017-01-21 Thread Remi Forax
- Mail original - > De: "Michał Zegan" <webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl> > À: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net > Envoyé: Samedi 21 Janvier 2017 15:00:25 > Objet: java.desktop > Hi. Hi Mickael, > Is java.desktop now divided in separate parts, or are there

java.desktop

2017-01-21 Thread Michał Zegan
Hi. Is java.desktop now divided in separate parts, or are there plans to do so? Because actually the whole point of your application having no unneeded dependencies is broken if you want java.beans, and suddenly get the whole desktop apis that are probably large, with their dependencies.

hg: jigsaw/jake/jdk: Revert uses of addReads in java.desktop module

2016-03-02 Thread alan . bateman
Changeset: becadcb5a0ee Author:alanb Date: 2016-03-02 19:00 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/becadcb5a0ee Revert uses of addReads in java.desktop module ! src/java.desktop/share/classes/com/sun/beans/decoder/FieldElementHandler.java ! src/java.desktop