Hi Jochen,
Is there anything stopping you for doing something like:
try {
Class.forName(innerClassName, true, initalizeClass.getClassLoader());
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
throw new ExceptionInInitializerError(e); // Should never happen
}
I know it is not pretty.
/Kasper
On
Hi Mandy,
Yes, but they create a member which is not accessible.
As far as I can see, all places where AccessibleObject.override is ever set
there is a check of the current caller with Reflection.getCallerClass().
/Kasper
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 19:25, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
> Have you looked at
; - Mail original -
> > De: "Kasper Nielsen"
> > À: "jigsaw-dev"
> > Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Janvier 2020 12:14:30
> > Objet: Lookup objects and setAccessible
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to bridge some old code using java.lang.reflect
Hi,
I'm trying to bridge some old code using java.lang.reflect and some new code
that uses Lookup objects. And I'm wondering if there is some way to make
a member accessible using a Lookup object? Or if open packages/modules via
module-info.java + member.setAccessible(true) is the only way?
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 07:48, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Which library or framework is this and is there a write-up of the issues
> encountered when migrating it to use Lookup objects?
>
> -Alan
>
It is a small dependency injection/application I am trying to built on top
of the module system.
It is
>
> This is the type of use-case where using Lookup objects might be a
> better choice. If you can coerce the user module to pass a suitably
> privileged Lookup to the framework then the framework will be able to
> inject classes without needing to open packages to the framework. I
> think this is
Hi,
Having worked with the module system for some time now. There is one
situation I've started coming across a number of times now, that requires a
lot of boiler plate.
Opening every package of a module to another module. For example, for
dependency injection, code analysis, ect.
Basically you
Hi Mandy,
I don't have access to JBS unfortunately.
Cheers
Kasper
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 16:50, Mandy Chung wrote:
> Can you file a JBS issue?
>
> Mandy
>
> On 10/23/18 12:15 PM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
>
> Hi Mandy,
>
> Yes, that it was my code is doin
I think unreflecting a member
> will do what you are looking for to check if the lookup object has access
> to the member. What does the code do if the Lookup object has access
> vs has no access?
>
> Mandy
>
> On 10/22/18 1:17 PM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
>
> Hi,
&
Hi,
Are there any elegant way to test if a Lookup object has access to a member
(field, constructor, method). Right now I'm using the following code
public static boolean hasAccess(MethodHandles.Lookup lookup, Member member)
{
if (member instanceof Constructor) {
try {
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any reasons for why these 3 classes in
java.lang.Module
Configuration
FindException
ResolutionException
Does not include the name Module?
I especially am not to fond of the very generic Configuration name in my
source code would much prefer something like
11 matches
Mail list logo
