[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17126023#comment-17126023
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-10101:
-
[~ijuma] : Could you double check if this is an issue? Thanks.
>
Jun Rao created KAFKA-10101:
---
Summary: recovery point is advanced without flushing the data
after recovery
Key: KAFKA-10101
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10101
Project: Kafka
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17118904#comment-17118904
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-806:
---
[~mjsax]: I think this is still an issue.
> Index may not always observe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17101751#comment-17101751
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9826:
[~fekelund]: Yes. Updated the fix versions.
> Log cleaning repeatedly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao updated KAFKA-9826:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.5.1
2.4.2
> Log cleaning repeatedly picks same segment with no effect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-9866.
Fix Version/s: 2.6.0
Resolution: Fixed
Merged the PR to trunk.
> Do not attempt to elect preferred
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17090711#comment-17090711
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-2419:
Sensor expiring is only used on the broker. For the clients, typically
Jun Rao created KAFKA-9892:
--
Summary: Producer state snapshot needs to be forced to disk
Key: KAFKA-9892
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9892
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17085916#comment-17085916
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9543:
[~hachikuji]: Thanks for the analysis. It does seem this issue could be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-8470.
Fix Version/s: 2.6.0
Resolution: Fixed
Merged the PR to trunk.
1. Defaults state-change log
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-9711.
Fix Version/s: 2.6.0
Resolution: Fixed
Merged the PR to trunk.
> The authentication failure caused
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17061243#comment-17061243
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-3919:
[~zhangchenghui]: Appreciate the detailed analysis. I noticed that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17057325#comment-17057325
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9693:
[~paolomoriello]: By metadata, I was referring to the metadata in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17057256#comment-17057256
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9693:
[~paolomoriello]: Thanks for the reply. Do you know if the increase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17056188#comment-17056188
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9693:
[~paolomoriello]: Thanks for the detailed analysis. Very interesting.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17053839#comment-17053839
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9677:
[~apovzner] : Thanks for finding this issue! I agree with your suggested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17052419#comment-17052419
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9648:
[~flashmouse] : Thanks for the reply. Just to clarify. TCP window
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17051699#comment-17051699
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9648:
[~flashmouse]: Thanks for the analysis. Great finding! The impact seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-9498.
Fix Version/s: 2.6.0
Resolution: Fixed
Merged the PR to trunk.
> Topic validation during the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17042307#comment-17042307
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-4084:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9594 identifies an issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-6266.
Resolution: Fixed
Merged into 2.4 and trunk.
> Kafka 1.0.0 : Repeated occurrence of WARN Resetting first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17039522#comment-17039522
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-6266:
[~david.mao]: I merged the PR to trunk. However, it doesn't apply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034592#comment-17034592
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7061:
[~senthilm-ms] : Sorry for the delay. I will review the PR this week.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17033734#comment-17033734
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8374:
This could be related to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17032006#comment-17032006
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-4084:
Do you see the incoming byte rate of that broker much more than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17031955#comment-17031955
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-4084:
[~evanjpw]: There are metrics related to replication throttling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17030864#comment-17030864
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-4084:
[~evanjpw]: I am not sure if you need the new config. The controller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17030819#comment-17030819
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-4084:
[~evanjpw]:
# For this case, you do have to script up things yourself.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17030298#comment-17030298
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-4084:
[~sriharsha], hmm, if one sets follower.replication.throttled.rate to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17021795#comment-17021795
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8532:
[~lbdai3190] : To verify this, I wrote the following short program. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17019835#comment-17019835
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8532:
[~lbdai3190]: Thanks for the followup investigation. The following code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17018279#comment-17018279
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8532:
[~lbdai3190]: Sorry for the late reply. Took a look at your last
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17013081#comment-17013081
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8764:
[~trajakovic]: Thanks for providing the additional info. That makes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17013058#comment-17013058
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8764:
[~trajakovic]: Thanks for the investigation. Normally, the offset map is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16987550#comment-16987550
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-6266:
Looking at the code where the "Resetting first dirty offset " warning is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16974548#comment-16974548
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9044:
[~pmbuko]: Thanks for the update.
> Brokers occasionally (randomly?)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16969452#comment-16969452
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9044:
The ZK session is typically created when the broker starts, not when it
Jun Rao created KAFKA-9157:
--
Summary: logcleaner could generate empty segment files after
cleaning
Key: KAFKA-9157
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9157
Project: Kafka
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968926#comment-16968926
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9044:
When a broker establishes a ZK session, it should log the session id as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968861#comment-16968861
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9044:
Hmm, I did a quick check and the controller seems to never delete a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968833#comment-16968833
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9044:
Interesting, that ZK session lasted for only 30 secs. This almost seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968793#comment-16968793
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9044:
Did the ZK log show that broker 23's ZK session expired around that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968545#comment-16968545
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-9044:
It may also be useful to parse the ZK commit log to see if there is any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16967806#comment-16967806
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7987:
[~gcampbell], we could try calling scheduleSessionExpiryHandler() in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16919669#comment-16919669
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8522:
[~Yohan123], not sure that I fully understood your question. We need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16910793#comment-16910793
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8522:
[~Yohan123], I was thinking the new checkpoint file will be under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905792#comment-16905792
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8522:
[~Yohan123]: For upgrade, we can roughly do the following. If the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16902334#comment-16902334
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8522:
[~Yohan123], I was thinking of adding a new checkpoint file per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16902324#comment-16902324
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8716:
[~yuyang08], thanks for the update.
> broker cannot join the cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16899305#comment-16899305
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-4545:
[~Yohan123], if you want to work on this jira and follow the approach I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16894142#comment-16894142
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8716:
It's weird that the session was closed very quickly after SyncConnected.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16893977#comment-16893977
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8716:
Hmm, that's kind of weird. We do wait for the ZK session to be connected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16893925#comment-16893925
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8716:
Currently, we don't handle ZK session expiration for the initial broker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16893052#comment-16893052
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8522:
[~Yohan123], this jira is similar to KAFKA-4545 and likely requires the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16878247#comment-16878247
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8522:
Since we are returning the tombstone to the consumer, it may not be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16877341#comment-16877341
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8522:
[~dhruvilshah] mentioned that the original timestamp of the tombstone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16874578#comment-16874578
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8522:
[~EeveeB], thanks for reporting this. This is related to KAFKA-4545.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16865744#comment-16865744
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8532:
[~lbdai3190], if this issue happens again, it would be useful to take a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16864184#comment-16864184
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8532:
[~lbdai3190], expiryScheduler.shutdown() is probably not the issue. That
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863468#comment-16863468
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8532:
[~lbdai3190], thanks for reporting the issue. From the stacktrace, it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862569#comment-16862569
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7504:
[~allenxwang], thanks for the update. A couple of more thoughts on this.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859031#comment-16859031
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7504:
[~allenxwang], thanks for doing the test and sharing the results. Your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16856233#comment-16856233
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7504:
[~allenxwang], there is a PR attached to the jira. I guess we just want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16812556#comment-16812556
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7983:
[~rahul.mnit], just added you to the contributor list and assigned the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao reassigned KAFKA-7983:
--
Assignee: Rahul Agarwal
> supporting replication.throttled.replicas in dynamic broker configuration
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16811005#comment-16811005
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7983:
Probably. But I think the common broker level setting will be just *.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810370#comment-16810370
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7983:
[~huxi_2b], leader.replication.throttled.replicas and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16805539#comment-16805539
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8106:
[~Flower.min], one of the validation that the broker has to do is to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16802074#comment-16802074
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7504:
[~cwaldrop], thanks for the results. It does seem to be nice
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16795523#comment-16795523
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7504:
[~cwaldrop], thanks for helping test this out. It would be useful to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16791910#comment-16791910
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-6029:
[~hzxa21], do you still plan to work on this? Thanks.
> Controller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-7977.
Resolution: Fixed
The PR in KAFKA-8018 is merged, which should reduce the chance for ZK session
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-8022.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.11.0.4)
2.2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16783838#comment-16783838
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8022:
The fsync to ZK txn log can take 10+ secs. Filed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao reassigned KAFKA-8022:
--
Assignee: Jun Rao
> Flaky Test RequestQuotaTest#testExemptRequestTime
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16782210#comment-16782210
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-8018:
Created a PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6354
> Flaky Test
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao reassigned KAFKA-8018:
--
Assignee: Jun Rao
> Flaky Test
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-7956.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Gardner Vickers
Fix Version/s: 2.3.0
Merged the PR to trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16775565#comment-16775565
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7987:
One potential way to fix this is to handle auth failure in
Jun Rao created KAFKA-7987:
--
Summary: a broker's ZK session may die on transient auth failure
Key: KAFKA-7987
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7987
Project: Kafka
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16775560#comment-16775560
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7986:
This can potentially be done by passing in a clientID string in the
Jun Rao created KAFKA-7986:
--
Summary: distinguish the logging from different ZooKeeperClient
instances
Key: KAFKA-7986
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7986
Project: Kafka
Issue
Jun Rao created KAFKA-7983:
--
Summary: supporting replication.throttled.replicas in dynamic
broker configuration
Key: KAFKA-7983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7983
Project: Kafka
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-7864.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3.0
Merged the PR to trunk.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-7283.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3.0
Merged the PR to trunk.
> mmap indexes lazily and skip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16758638#comment-16758638
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7888:
[~kemalerden], from the log, the "Cached zkVersion" log started around
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-7837.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
Merged the PR to trunk.
> maybeShrinkIsr may not reflect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-7838.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
Merged the PR to trunk.
> improve logging in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16751766#comment-16751766
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7837:
[~dhruvilshah], the following is the description of the iterator of
Jun Rao created KAFKA-7864:
--
Summary: AdminZkClient.validateTopicCreate() should validate that
partitions are 0-based
Key: KAFKA-7864
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7864
Project: Kafka
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16746520#comment-16746520
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7837:
@lindong, yes, the approach that you described sounds good.
>
Jun Rao created KAFKA-7838:
--
Summary: improve logging in Partition.maybeShrinkIsr()
Key: KAFKA-7838
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7838
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16745680#comment-16745680
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7837:
One way to improve this is that in maybeShrinkIsr(), for each iterated
Jun Rao created KAFKA-7837:
--
Summary: maybeShrinkIsr may not reflect OfflinePartitions
immediately
Key: KAFKA-7837
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7837
Project: Kafka
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16745672#comment-16745672
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7836:
[~lindong], it seems that we could call zkClient.propagateLogDirEvent
Jun Rao created KAFKA-7836:
--
Summary: The propagation of log dir failure can be delayed due to
slowness in closing the file handles
Key: KAFKA-7836
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7836
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-7829.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
Merged to trunk.
> Javadoc should show that
Jun Rao created KAFKA-7829:
--
Summary: Inaccurate description for --reassignment-json-file
option in ReassignPartitionsCommand
Key: KAFKA-7829
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7829
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16744272#comment-16744272
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7829:
[~lindong], could you verify if this is inaccurate?
> Inaccurate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16736415#comment-16736415
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-7786:
Great find, Anna. About the fix. I am not sure that we need the protocol
201 - 300 of 481 matches
Mail list logo