mimaison commented on PR #10826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826#issuecomment-2154623171
Closing this PR since https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15516 has been
merged.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
mimaison closed pull request #10826: KAFKA-7632: Support Compression Level
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
mimaison commented on PR #10826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826#issuecomment-2048127235
I opened https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15516 to implement this KIP.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
ijuma commented on code in PR #10826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826#discussion_r850506417
##
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java:
##
@@ -188,6 +190,12 @@ public class ProducerConfig extends AbstractConfig {
mimaison commented on PR #10826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826#issuecomment-1931723005
I updated the
[KIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-390%3A+Support+Compression+Level)
based on [Jun's
mimaison commented on PR #10826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826#issuecomment-1801941525
Yes it would be good to get this over the line. @dongjinleekr Do you think
you'll have time to update it? or would you need some help?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
junrao commented on PR #10826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826#issuecomment-1795952612
One discussion of the PR is around choosing the default value for
`compression.level`
(https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826#discussion_r917108950). This is
tricky since it's
ozturkberkay commented on PR #10826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10826#issuecomment-1786847820
Hi, I was wondering if this PR would be prioritized in the foreseeable
future given there has been a lot of work done already
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
