maybe that version is one behind this fix.
snpInfo = {"rs1229984": [resno: 48,
from: "R",
to: "H"],
"rs1041969": [resno: 57,
from: "N",
to: "K"]
};
print "=== Case 1 ==
On 10/01/2015 06:12 AM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Then map.array("id") is perfect for you. It turns that map into an actual
> array (temporarily), and you can then use WHERE and WHEREIN on that next
> level of maps. After you do that, using array("id") again returns your
> top-level map. The result wa
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Rolf Huehne wrote:
> On 09/29/2015 10:08 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> > I have an idea. Let's call the "associative array" a "map" just so we
> > don't have so many "array" words.
> >
> I would rather prefer "hash" because the term is used for it in other
> language
On 09/29/2015 10:08 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> I have an idea. Let's call the "associative array" a "map" just so we
> don't have so many "array" words.
>
I would rather prefer "hash" because the term is used for it in other
languages like Perl and I am used to it. I used "associative array" to
a
I have an idea. Let's call the "associative array" a "map" just so we don't
have so many "array" words.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Rolf Huehne
wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 06:46 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Implemented are now the following combinations (among others), if I
> understood it correc
On 09/28/2015 06:46 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> //Thank you, Rolf, for working on the .select() business. /After taking
> a close look at it, I decided the select() function was getting too
> cryptic, and I agree that there were some inconsistencies there. What is
> given below is much simpler. This
*Thank you, Rolf, for working on the .select() business. After taking a
close look at it, I decided the select() function was getting too cryptic,
and I agree that there were some inconsistencies there. What is given below
is much simpler. This long email message summarizes the JmolSQL business,
st
7 matches
Mail list logo
