Re: [Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-04-06 Thread Eric Martz
Correction: On 4/6/17 5:58 PM, Eric Martz wrote: > Windows 10: Firefox ESR, Pale Moon, Seamonkey, Maxthon (but see > caution about data sent to China by Maxthon at above link). I can't > test Waterfox because I don't have 64-bit Windows. The correction is that Firefox ESR in Windows runs both t

Re: [Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-04-06 Thread Eric Martz
Thanks, Henry! I did not know about unchecking "Run in safe mode" (hidden unless you hold down the option key). After doing that, I can run Jmol_S Java applet from local files (FirstGlance in Jmol) in Safari, which is convenient for testing while developing. We list browsers that still support

Re: [Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-04-06 Thread Rzepa, Henry S
Apologies if my post-tracking is not up to scratch. I have been silently grappling with Java security policies on my own routine browser Safari. This browser, including the “Safari technology preview”, the latest version of which was released only yesterday, still support the browser plugi

Re: [Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-03-29 Thread David Hibbitts
I don't have any *insider* information of any kind, but their "About" page seems pretty clear that they're in favor of allowing users to use Java and any other plugins if they wish. Also revealing is this page from their blog: https://www.waterfoxproject.org/blog/waterfox-52.0-release-download wh