Re: [Jmol-users] proposed change to Jmol.js

2008-09-01 Thread Rolf Huehne
Robert Hanson wrote: One more thought on this: What about an option that allows the replacement of the Jar file but first prompts the user for an OK (using JavaScript prompt() ) and explains why this might be an issue? If the user says it is OK, then the Jar file is used? Accepting should

Re: [Jmol-users] proposed change to Jmol.js

2008-09-01 Thread Robert Hanson
OK. Others have comments on this? Bob On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Rolf Huehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Hanson wrote: One more thought on this: What about an option that allows the replacement of the Jar file but first prompts the user for an OK (using JavaScript prompt() )

[Jmol-users] stereo doesn't propagate?

2008-09-01 Thread Thomas Stout
Hi All --- I was just working on adding a toggle stereo button to my web page driving the Jmol 11.6RC10 applet (separate issue...possible?), when I noticed that the status of stereo doesn't seem to propagate to a new pop-up applet window. I've reproduced this on Bob Hanson's new page:

Re: [Jmol-users] mol2 files

2008-09-01 Thread Juergen Suehnel
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht - Von: Bob Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. August 2008 20:19 An: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Jmol-users] mol2 files Where do these files come from? The mol2 format does not allow for anything between the number and the

Re: [Jmol-users] proposed Jmol.js changes...

2008-09-01 Thread Jonathan Gutow
I think Rolf's constraints are appropriate. Jonathan On Sep 1, 2008, at 1:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 3 Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:58:11 +0200 From: Rolf Huehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] proposed change to Jmol.js To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net