Re: [jokosher-devel] Play/Pause discussion... the rebirth... once more
Well, about the implementation itself. The play/pause is already there, so the button won't change that. It's just the labels. Again, most players I've seen handle the play button as a two sided one, with play/pause. Take for example google video, youtube and metacafe. They both use the play/pause button and they're pretty much the most successful video sites on the web. The stop button is not going anywhere also. It'll remain as stop and rewind. Bottom line is, if the button behaves as play/pause, why won't its label/icon behave the same way as well. On 2/18/07, Thilo Pfennig < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Corrales schrieb: > I think that pretty much sums it all up. In practically all the > video/audio players embedded in browsers now, they use the play/pause > button. Other players do it too and I find it to be the most intuitive > way to use a double function button. Hi David, same discussion was in gnome-usability. I dont agree at all. To sum it up: iPod iPod did this and now people used to iPod think this is a good thing and also some GUI designers. From the technical level I only can say that the pausing as the only possibility has led to many headaches on my Fedora box (don't know how others cope with it). Thats because many apps dont seem to be able to really give gstreamer freedom. Soif I play pause in Banshee or rhythmbox I can not play with totem. I now have to quit the whole applications - because there is not stop. But uI guess this can be solved, although I like to see that first. Again about better usability - Not sure about that. People who do not use iPod (do you? I dont) maybe not find their way through. Would be a good thing to make some usability tests on that? Regards, Thilo -- PfennigSolutions - IT-Beratung- Wiki-Systeme c/o Thilo Pfennig - Sandkrug 28 - 24143 Kiel http://www.pfennigsolutions.de/ ___ jokosher-devel-list mailing list jokosher-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/jokosher-devel-list
Re: [jokosher-devel] SoC 2007
It would be definetly good idea, because Gstreamer needs lot of improvements, which would directly benefit Jokosher and others - improved ALSA support for high end cards, primitive MIDI support, etc. Just my two cents, Peter 2007/2/18, Edward Hervey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hey all, > > Wouldn't it make more sense to put jokosher, gstreamer, pitivi and > other gstreamer-based projects under one GStreamer umbrella project ? > Last year we screwed up the timing to register GStreamer as a project, > but this time I'm sure we can prepare a solid proposal. > >Edward > > On 2/16/07, Jono Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yep folks, > > > > Its out again, do you think we should register as a project? > > > > Jono > > ___ > > jokosher-devel-list mailing list > > jokosher-devel-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/jokosher-devel-list > > > > > -- > Edward Hervey > Multimedia editing developer / Fluendo S.A. > http://www.pitivi.org/ > ___ > jokosher-devel-list mailing list > jokosher-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/jokosher-devel-list > ___ jokosher-devel-list mailing list jokosher-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/jokosher-devel-list
Re: [jokosher-devel] SoC 2007
Hey all, Wouldn't it make more sense to put jokosher, gstreamer, pitivi and other gstreamer-based projects under one GStreamer umbrella project ? Last year we screwed up the timing to register GStreamer as a project, but this time I'm sure we can prepare a solid proposal. Edward On 2/16/07, Jono Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep folks, > > Its out again, do you think we should register as a project? > > Jono > ___ > jokosher-devel-list mailing list > jokosher-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/jokosher-devel-list > -- Edward Hervey Multimedia editing developer / Fluendo S.A. http://www.pitivi.org/ ___ jokosher-devel-list mailing list jokosher-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/jokosher-devel-list