Thank you Dirk :)
The issue is fixed in revision 4667.
I would say I love the current development model, too :)
2011/12/18 Dirk Stöcker
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Vincent Privat wrote:
>
> I'm fixing #7162 right now.
>>
>
> Probably we really have the best developers of the world!
>
>
> Ciao
> --
>
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Vincent Privat wrote:
I'm fixing #7162 right now.
Probably we really have the best developers of the world!
Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists
I'm fixing #7162 right now.
2011/12/18 Dirk Stöcker
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Simon Legner wrote:
>
> I know this delay is one of the drawbacks of our current development model
>>>
>> Git or Mercurial as VCS could easily deal with a stable master branch,
>> development/feature branches and dealing
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Simon Legner wrote:
I know this delay is one of the drawbacks of our current development model
Git or Mercurial as VCS could easily deal with a stable master branch,
development/feature branches and dealing with hot fixes (see for example
[1]).
I don't know whether it is a
Hi!
> So patches accumulated over the last week may be integrated.
I'll take care of my patches in the course of the next week (from
Tuesday on).
> I know this delay is one of the drawbacks of our current development model
Git or Mercurial as VCS could easily deal with a stable master branch,
dev
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Paul Hartmann wrote:
The lowest hanging fruit would be to share TMS sources:
<
http://git.openstreetmap.org/potlatch2.git/blob/HEAD:/resources/imagery.xml
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps
Both lists are quite long, but have surprisingly little overlap.
The format
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Frederik Ramm wrote:
But I admit that this is a kind of romantic view because it assumes that
everyone easily has a server available where they could publish their styles,
and that information about available styles flows freely without the need for
a central directory. Bo
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Paul Hartmann wrote:
There are two new reports:
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/7158
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/7162
#7158 is probably a rare situation or special configuration. (We haven't
had any complaints so far.)
Not sure how serious #7162 is, but I'd fe
7158 is probably caused by meddling with the shortcut keys/running 2
instances simultaneously/experimenting with the very latest possibilities
all combined.
I dropped the configuration directory .josm and completely started over and
now all seems fine.
Polyglot
2011/12/18 Paul Hartmann
> On 12
Hi,
On 12/18/2011 04:59 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
But I admit that this is a kind of romantic view because it assumes that
everyone easily has a server available where they could publish their
styles,
Github FTW.
Yeah, I'm sure if one was desperate one could also publish via Facebook
or G
On 18/12/2011 15:12, Frederik Ramm wrote:
But I admit that this is a kind of romantic view because it assumes that
everyone easily has a server available where they could publish their
styles,
Github FTW.
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreet
On 12/18/2011 04:39 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Paul Hartmann wrote:
>
>> On 12/18/2011 04:04 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
>>> On 18/12/2011 13:46, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>>>
Working together with the autors of other editors also would be a good
idea, but until tod
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Paul Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/18/2011 04:04 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> > On 18/12/2011 13:46, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> >
> >> Working together with the autors of other editors also would be a good
> >> idea, but until today all such tries failed miserably.
> >
> > I
On 12/18/2011 04:04 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> On 18/12/2011 13:46, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>
>> Working together with the autors of other editors also would be a good
>> idea, but until today all such tries failed miserably.
>
> I suspect what this needs is for one person to just go ahead and
> i
Dirk,
On 12/18/2011 02:46 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
Maybe I'm a bit over-sensitive ATM, but on one hand you blame me that
JOSM depends too much on the server information and on the other hand
you praise exactly these feature and would like to have them extended?
What I like is when this works in
On 12/18/2011 02:57 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> stabilization phase ended today. So patches accumulated over the last
> week may be integrated. We had a very long stabilization phase caused by
> Paul's idea to improve the preferences :-)
>
> I know this delay is one of the drawbacks of our
On 18/12/2011 13:46, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
Working together with the autors of other editors also would be a good
idea, but until today all such tries failed miserably.
I suspect what this needs is for one person to just go ahead and
implement something, and for the other editor coders to see w
Hi,
stabilization phase ended today. So patches accumulated over the last week
may be integrated. We had a very long stabilization phase caused by Paul's
idea to improve the preferences :-)
I know this delay is one of the drawbacks of our current development
model, but as it happens very sel
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Frederik Ramm wrote:
There is a sad story behind this. From day one, presets were designed to be
distributed. It was never the plan to have one central set of presets that
the JOSM team would maintain and everyone would follow that. The idea was
that interested users could
19 matches
Mail list logo