On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Simon Legner simon.leg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 30/01/12 15:07, Josh Doe wrote:
I would suggest that we create a single set of changes between each
tested release, separating the changes by major/minor enhancements,
and major bugs (leaving minor bugs to be
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012, Simon Legner wrote:
Do you think we can merge both lists, at least internally? We'd have one
wiki page ChangelogSource and each entry is marked either for changelog
or for startup note or for both. This would remove redundancy and make
live easier for the translators.
Hi!
On 09/02/12 16:58, Paul Hartmann wrote:
Do you think we can merge both lists, at least internally? We'd have one
wiki page ChangelogSource and each entry is marked either for changelog
or for startup note or for both. This would remove redundancy and make
live easier for the translators.
On 02/07/2012 02:23 PM, Simon Legner wrote:
Hi,
On 30/01/12 15:07, Josh Doe wrote:
I would suggest that we create a single set of changes between each
tested release, separating the changes by major/minor enhancements,
and major bugs (leaving minor bugs to be found via tickets). I believe
I think it would be useful to create a more user-friendly changelog
for the -tested releases, something which lies between the contents of
the StartupPage and the SVN log. As we seem to be focused on creating
a better experience for new users (e.g. creating expert mode), I think
we need to take
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Josh Doe wrote:
I think it would be useful to create a more user-friendly changelog
for the -tested releases, something which lies between the contents of
the StartupPage and the SVN log. As we seem to be focused on creating
a better experience for new users (e.g. creating