Daniel Koć wrote:
as Potlatch is not in active development AFAIK
Semi-active. I add a new feature when I see the need, but happily since it's
not the default any more, the more excitable elements of our community can
burn someone else out instead with their incessant STOP PEOPLE EDITING THE
MAP
Daniel Koć wrote:
I semi-hate Flash ;-} as a web technology
Try programming in the Flex framework and then you'll really hate it. ;)
Being default or not and very active or just in relaxed state of
development is not that important in this context - it's still one
of the OSM editors
Stefan wrote:
Judging by the amount of “I've just used google maps to ...
diary posts on osm.org this *will* lead to trouble otherwise.
Yep.
Potlatch 1 always checked for the presence of 'google' in the tile URL and
refused to display the tile if so. When Potlatch 2 was first released, we
Hello all,
== JOSM users: please read ==
Your developers are great people and I'm sure they will be making the
imagery live when they humanly get a moment, no doubt within the next
day or so. Please have faith in them and stop bugging them. And me.
== JOSM developers: please read ==
Bing
[posted to both talk-gb and josm-dev]
I'm a bit exasperated to see that the relation for National Cycle
Network route 4 has been broken _yet_ again:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2204
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2204/720
NCN 4 does of course
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Let's get something like that for JOSM. Hope they haven't patented
the thing ;-)
Pfeh, it's ok for you guys, they chose a licence that's compatible with
yours. Not something I can say. :(
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
But while we're at it, give us some reasons why we need to remain
1.5 compatible. I'm not in a hurry to switch to 1.6 but we'll do it
at *some* point and I am interested in finding out what that point
is going to be.
1.6 isn't available for PowerPC Macs, FWIW. Apple
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
why is it crucial to the concept of Potlatch to upload every
modification directly and just-in-time? Wouldn't it be suitable as
well to have an upload-button and just upload changes made on explicit
request?
See my other message:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Well, to be honest I'm not convinced that conflict management is
that important. I got only two or three conflicts in my 2-3 OSM
years and I have edited the OSM data a lot (in Nürnberg, where
other mappers are also active). That means roughly 1 conflict per
year
Matt Amos wrote:
of course, if what you meant was that because you write the potlatch
api you can reach into the guts of the database and fiddle with
changesets after they're closed... well... :-P
Don't get too excited. I can commit whatever evil stuff I like, but
Tom has the final say over
10 matches
Mail list logo
