Petr Nejedly napsal(a):
Dirk Stöcker napsal(a):
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Gerv also hinted at the fact that JOSM is written in a way that is
somewhat untypical for Java, and whenever a newcomer to JOSM programming
said this is all bullshit let's refactor it wholesale I told
Evgeny Mandrikov napsal(a):
Why are you using ant instead of maven in JOSM-NG?
The obvious answer is 42 of course...
Guess what. I just created a new J2SE project in NetBeans and it created
an ant script for me with all the bells and whistles. It helps me debug,
it helps me profile. On the
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
standard Java-isms
industry best practice
Structural design patterns
I, for one, would like to also attract developers for whom maybe Java
and OO are not the environment in which they spend all of their
programming lifes
Hi,
I don't see why this needs so much discussion. Everything has been said a
good while ago in this thread. Now it seems to become more and more a
discussion about taste. And as we all know taste is diffrent.
It is good to know that there are two approaches right now. JOSM-ng for
the guys
Dirk Stöcker napsal(a):
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Gerv also hinted at the fact that JOSM is written in a way that is
somewhat untypical for Java, and whenever a newcomer to JOSM programming
said this is all bullshit let's refactor it wholesale I told them to
please find
Why are you using ant instead of maven in JOSM-NG?
--
Best regards,
Evgeny Mandrikov aka Godin mailto:mandrikov at gmail.com
homepage http://godin.net.ru
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the main benefit of encapsulation is to make code more flexible
for refactoring, internal changes, performance optimization
through implementation hiding
That is true for new developments. For existing code other rules apply.
The main rule here
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I think if someone came along with a real good performance optimization
for JOSM that, as an aside, requires more encapsulation than JOSM
currently has, that would be a very good reason to add said encapsulation.
Trouble is, until now we have had a lot of textbook
Petr Nejedly wrote:
When thinking of it now, I don't think starting josm-ng was a bad idea.
It allowed me to prototype my ideas quickly and some of the ideas can
still be taken from josm-ng and ported to josm.
Petr, just out of interest, why didn't you base josm-ng on the NetBeans
platform,
Hi,
Gervase Markham wrote:
By its very nature, it's impossible to tell how many more
.. or less ..
contributors
there would be, and how much better
.. or worse ..
the code would be, if it was written
more in line with standard Java best practice. But Petr and I are at
least two data
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Gervase Markham wrote:
By its very nature, it's impossible to tell how many more
.. or less ..
contributors
there would be, and how much better
.. or worse ..
I think it's unlikely that moving code more towards standard Java-isms
and industry best
Hi everybody,
Help me to understand - what is the difference between JOSM and JOSM-NG?
I tried to find a mention in the internet about josm-ng, but unsuccessfully.
P.S. sorry for my English.
--
Best regards,
Evgeny Mandrikov aka Godin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
homepage http://godin.net.ru
Hi,
Help me to understand - what is the difference between JOSM and JOSM-NG?
I tried to find a mention in the internet about josm-ng, but unsuccessfully.
JOSM-NG has a much cleaner design and is much faster, but it doesn't yet
have as much functionality as JOSM has, so people still use JOSM
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
To me rewrites look like dead-born projects most of the time. Why not
fix josm instead? I never understood, why total rewrites from scratch
should be useful. Every software can be moved to a new and better design
step by step.
As I understand it, the reason is a
Hi,
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
To me rewrites look like dead-born projects most of the time. Why not
fix josm instead? I never understood, why total rewrites from scratch
should be useful. Every software can be moved to a new and better design
step by step.
JOSM does carry a lot of baggage.
15 matches
Mail list logo
