On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Frederik Ramm wrote:
As the person who originally introduced the "use_last_as_default"
functionality to JOSM I feel that I must side with Florian here. That
functionality was introduced precisely for addresses - at the time we thought
it would be putting people off if they
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Dirk - You are doing great work - i just tell you that changing a default
may have huge impact on peoples workflow and this has bitten at least me
and 3 collegues in my office who stopped adding addresses and updated
josm every day to check whether bug w
Hola,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 04:44:35PM +0200, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> And please note:
> JOSM is no commercial software and we don't think about or document
> every effect a change may have to users. If you want this you either
> need to pay for it or start to help in development.
Dirk - You are
Hi,
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
Release 4064 is used by approx 65% of people for about 2 months now and
you are the first complaining about this issue, so it can't be that
important.
As the person who originally introduced the "use_last_as_default"
functionality to JOSM I feel that I must side with
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Here in the office people were yelling at me for at least 4 days because
editing became a PITA
I'd assume you should use other presets which fit your workflow better.
and it was simply an undocumented change in default behaviour..
Well, the previou
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Paul Hartmann wrote:
> Thus we
> have choosen the current variant which means a simple and understandable
> rule: Only use defaults when not already tagged.
My opinion: it worked well before.
Which version?
There was a change a lot of revisions ago in Rev 4050 (befor
On 07/07/2011 11:57 AM, Kay Drangmeister wrote:
Am 07.07.2011, 10:04 Uhr, schrieb Dirk Stöcker
:
The "defaults" do not work.
refusing an obvious choice of offering the last
city/postcode/street the user entered is - oem - a strange decision.
Thus we
have choosen the current variant which m
Am 07.07.2011, 10:04 Uhr, schrieb Dirk Stöcker :
The "defaults" do not work.
refusing an obvious choice of offering the last
city/postcode/street the user entered is - oem - a strange decision.
Thus we
have choosen the current variant which means a simple and understandable
rule: Only use d
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Florian Lohoff wrote:
The "defaults" do not work. This is the same as when one of the
elements would have the tag with a value. In this case defaults
would not be applied as well.
"Default" means "try to guess what user wants". Guessing should be
used with care and this is w
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> >Aeh - Okay - Somebody draws thousands of buildings and tags it with
> >building=yes. Now i do site survey and add addresses - suddenly my
> >presets dont work -> Bug ...
>
> The "defaults" do not work. This is the same as when one of
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Florian Lohoff wrote:
JOSM distinguishes between untagged elements, which get defaults
applied and already tagged elements, where defaults are not applied.
This ensures that editing already tagged elements does not introduce
unwanted tags.
Aeh - Okay - Somebody draws thousa
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:36:05AM +0200, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> >>Bug or feature?
>
> Feature.
>
> JOSM distinguishes between untagged elements, which get defaults
> applied and already tagged elements, where defaults are not applied.
> This ensures that editing already tagged elements does not i
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Bug or feature?
Feature.
JOSM distinguishes between untagged elements, which get defaults applied
and already tagged elements, where defaults are not applied. This ensures
that editing already tagged elements does not introduce unwanted tags.
Ciao
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:02:25PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> Hi,
> is there a rational behind the latest josm not taking over the last
> addr mask settings if there is a "building=yes" on the way you try
> to set the tags?
>
> E.g. edit a way with addr:street/city/postcode/country, press "App
Hi,
is there a rational behind the latest josm not taking over the last
addr mask settings if there is a "building=yes" on the way you try
to set the tags?
E.g. edit a way with addr:street/city/postcode/country, press "Apply",
open an untagged way - edit address and all tags except housenumber
ge
15 matches
Mail list logo
