Re: [josm-dev] JOSM is the editor with the best user retention
Lennard wrote: Paul Johnson wrote: created_by= tags get stomped by Potlatch, JOSM leaves it alone if it's already set (unless, of course, a JOSM user deliberately deletes the existing created_by tags). This would give severely skewed results in favor of Potlatch. You would be correct, if you would've said it about 6 months ago. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/changeset/1720 http://josm.openstreetmap.de/changeset/1735 Well, that's a happy surprise! Thanks for the heads up. ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] JOSM is the editor with the best user retention
Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: interesting post by Matt on this blog: http://www.asklater.com/matt/wordpress/2009/12/editor-retention/ He arrives at the result that JOSM users are the ones most likely to stay with their editor. (Well... what else is available?) : JOSM, somewhat surprisingly, has more changesets total and with bboxes, : but maybe that’s just because until recently every upload was it’s own : changeset. Actually I'm not surprised. I think most power users will use JOSM, so more changesets are the result. Would be interesting to get the rate of changed elements per changeset for each editor. That would distinguish power users from minor edits. Also nice would be the created_by count in OSM data. Due to silently dropping them, JOSM's usage is also easy to see :-) created_by= tags get stomped by Potlatch, JOSM leaves it alone if it's already set (unless, of course, a JOSM user deliberately deletes the existing created_by tags). This would give severely skewed results in favor of Potlatch. ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] JOSM is the editor with the best user retention
Paul Johnson wrote: created_by= tags get stomped by Potlatch, JOSM leaves it alone if it's already set (unless, of course, a JOSM user deliberately deletes the existing created_by tags). This would give severely skewed results in favor of Potlatch. You would be correct, if you would've said it about 6 months ago. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/changeset/1720 http://josm.openstreetmap.de/changeset/1735 -- Lennard ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] JOSM is the editor with the best user retention
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: interesting post by Matt on this blog: http://www.asklater.com/matt/wordpress/2009/12/editor-retention/ He arrives at the result that JOSM users are the ones most likely to stay with their editor. (Well... what else is available?) : JOSM, somewhat surprisingly, has more changesets total and with bboxes, : but maybe that’s just because until recently every upload was it’s own : changeset. Actually I'm not surprised. I think most power users will use JOSM, so more changesets are the result. Would be interesting to get the rate of changed elements per changeset for each editor. That would distinguish power users from minor edits. Also nice would be the created_by count in OSM data. Due to silently dropping them, JOSM's usage is also easy to see :-) Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
