Since we apparently have two votes for trunk-only (maybe three with Tom) and none against, I'm going to provide a trunk-only dump for the Codehaus guys to import. Hopefully it will be up soon and we can get back to business!
I'll post a URL to the dump here as well for anyone that's interested.-- C
On Monday 03 July 2006 20:30, Charles O Nutter wrote:
> On 7/3/06, David Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sourceforge will always be there, as far as I understand it. We'll put
> links all over to point at the new location, but the "pre-codehaus" JRuby
> world will exist there, intact.
Right.
On 7/3/06, David Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sourceforge isn't going to go away anytime soon, right? I think trunk wouldbe fine. I'd consider keeping an archive copy of the CVS repository aroundanyway.Sourceforge will always be there, as far as I understand it. We'll put links all over to p
On Monday 03 July 2006 17:58, Charles O Nutter wrote:
Sourceforge isn't going to go away anytime soon, right? I think trunk would
be fine. I'd consider keeping an archive copy of the CVS repository around
anyway.
> I'd like input from the peanut gallery.
>
> FYI, for those of you using Eclips
I have done a couple test imports of SF CVS into Subversion on my headius.com server. We are trying to decide if we should just import TRUNK, which in cvs2svn means nothing but HEAD with no tags or branches brought along, or if we should import everything and delete what we want to clean up.
The tw
