Re: [Jruby-devel] unit test code coverage

2006-07-13 Thread Nick Sieger
On 7/13/06, Tim Azzopardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Not familiar with m2 (other than basic concept) or Surefire, but it sounds likecobertura would be a more flexible choice...Surefire is the maven plugin that runs the unit tests.  Actually I haven't used either coverage tool yet but I know from w

Re: [Jruby-devel] unit test code coverage

2006-07-13 Thread Tim Azzopardi
Nick Sieger wrote: > On 7/13/06, *Tim Azzopardi* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > I was thinking of doing something on unit test code coverage in > build.xml > > Obvious choices are Cobertura or Emma. I've had some (positive) > experience of both. > >

Re: [Jruby-devel] unit test code coverage

2006-07-13 Thread Nick Sieger
On 7/13/06, Tim Azzopardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was thinking of doing something on unit test code coverage in build.xmlObvious choices are Cobertura or Emma. I've had some (positive) experience of both.Emma has partial line coverage. Cobertura has prettier reports. Otherwise both lead the fi