On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:55 AM, William H. Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Executive summary of his presentation: If you're not using git, you're an
> idiot, even if Google hired you. Any questions?)
hehe, yeah that is a funny preso. However, Linus did put a lot of
thought and effort into
Here's a Google tech talk on git, by Linus Torvalds:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
(Executive summary of his presentation: If you're not using git,
you're an idiot, even if Google hired you. Any questions?)
-
T
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Andrew Lenards
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're forced to stay with an SVN repository - I know there is a git-svn
> bridge that is bi-directional. So you can pull in an svn repo, branch,
> work, and merge within git - then export the result back to svn. I've
I've been using Git with a personal project. I've been doing everything
from command-line in hopes of learning the raw commands. I don't know if I
can give it a full stamp of approval yet because I haven't done anything too
involved (I haven't done a merge, etc).
I believe there is an eclipse pl
I believe once you've figured out the "extra" command Push - it is
hard to rationalize using Subversion any more, regardless of the kind
of project and language.
I used Git (mainly because of a handful of hosted projects at
GitHub.com. For my personal (local network) projects I use Mercuri
I'm trying to decide between the three of these which to try out
first. I'm leaning towards Git right now but would love to hear
others' thoughts on this.
For the uninitiated these are three Distributed Version Control
Systems (DVCS), for a good read check out a friend's blog post
(http:/
