.
Hope this helps.
Art
-Original Message-
From: J t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July
17, 2002 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity
Continues!
On 7/17/02 6:34 PM, Lesiecki Nicholas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If its
, there will be no contest.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!
Hmmm...I find it hard to be convinced by arguments
like this: it's
.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Art Gramlich
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 7/18/02 11:28 AM
Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!
Actually around here the opinions are about 50/50 on which is better.
IntelliJ seems to do nice refactoring and is very speedy for a swing
application
Just unpack at the root of your eclipse install (c:\eclipse) using
folders and it will install itself into the proper plugin folders.
You might need to restart the IDE before it takes effect. It is a pretty
well hidden project. Basically, it will add an XML Editor that is linked
by default to
On 7/17/02 6:34 PM, Lesiecki Nicholas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If its an archive and the root directory is plugins then extract it to
/eclipse and it will probably work. This has been my experience.
Peace out.
Jt.
Hello, sorry to bother the group with newbie questions, but
the Eclipse help
