Re: [jug-discussion] build tools...

2006-12-23 Thread Bashar Abdul
I forgot to mention that Maven and ant have different objectives and serve different purposes. Maven manages the build process on a higher level and shields a lot of the details providing a uniform build system. You can still however easily run ant tasks in maven using the ant run plugin. Mave

Re: [jug-discussion] build tools...

2006-12-23 Thread Bashar Abdul
I second maven. It is an excellent build tool, just make sure you use maven 2 cause its much cleaner than maven 1. Actually I just finished upgrading some existing projects at work from maven 1 to use maven 2. Bashar My personal preference is Maven, it makes the build process very easy. One

Re: [jug-discussion] build tools...

2006-12-23 Thread Warner Onstine
My personal preference is Maven, it makes the build process very easy. One of the caveats with Maven is that you will *probably* have to sacrifice your build structure in order to gain that ease. But on the plus side it simplifies things a great deal. If this is a direction you're intereste

[jug-discussion] build tools...

2006-12-23 Thread Robert Zeigler
Without starting a flame-war... ;) I'm about to embark on updating a very brittle build process. It's currently based on a combination of relying on the IDE + a bit of ant In all honesty, I know make better than I know any other build tool, but I'd rather not do this build in make. So, I'm looking