Is anyone using Hudson (it's an extensible continuous integration engine)?
Has anyone played with it?
https://hudson.dev.java.net/
I just noticed that Apache is using it.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Lenards
andrew.lena...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone using Hudson (it's an extensible continuous integration engine)?
Has anyone played with it?
I've heard people like it, but I personally prefer something more
lightweight and easily hackable, and in my
No, but I plan on setting it up soon on my server to play with it and
do some CI locally.
-warner
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Lenards
andrew.lena...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone using Hudson (it's an extensible continuous integration engine)?
Has anyone played with it?
It is awesome! I had to install it on Windows because we have some unit
tests using a .NET component. A quick click installed it as a Windows
Service and I was up and running in no time.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Lenards andrew.lena...@gmail.comwrote:
Is anyone using Hudson (it's
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Todd Ellermann todde...@yahoo.com wrote:
After spending a week fighting with cruisecontrol I switched to hudson and
haven't looked back.
Just to be clear, you mean CruiseControl JAVA, not CruiseControl.rb
(in ruby), correct?
If so, I agree with you, CC java
Sorry, didn't even know there was a cruise control .rb
-T
Didn't parse that out of your earlier note.
Some things we like about hudson:
Start hudson java -jar hudson.war
Contact me off list if you want a linux service start/stop script for hudson.
We are using maven and grails to build our
Easy to set up the server is nice, but what I'd really like to hear is
how easy it is to set up a project or manage builds.
A couple years ago I switched from anthill to continuum and
adding/managing projects got a lot easier. I'm still on version 1.1,
but my only hangups with continuum are
