Hi users of the add-model API,
The authorized-keys config is now only required at bootstrap time, because
bootstrapping involves an SSH step. This means you no longer need to
specify authorized-keys in your config for add-model.
The Juju CLI will now automatically read ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub and
This should really be added to the docs about the automatic retry and how
to shut it off.
I created an issue and linked it to this discussion.
https://github.com/juju/docs/issues/1235
Can someone from core or more familiar with the feature document it for the
rest of us?
- Matt Bruzek
Hi Juju developers,
As requested by juju-core, we have added --race and Windows unit tests
to gated landings. These tests are run concurrently, not sequentially,
but all must complete before code can be landed.
As a practical matter, this means that landings are now impossible until
the Windows
Sorry for the mixup everyone, it's 15 July, not the 25th. :)
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> Hello everyone, a bunch of us have been on the road hitting up
> devopsdays, Berlin Buzzwords, and other conferences, so we'd thought
> we'd take a quick
Thanks Mark that's super helpful.
I'll read through the storage spec and inspect that bundle when I get a
sec, and update here with thoughts on how it might help solve my problem.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:35 PM Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 07/07/16 10:28, Robin Winslow wrote:
Hello everyone, a bunch of us have been on the road hitting up
devopsdays, Berlin Buzzwords, and other conferences, so we'd thought
we'd take a quick timeout to have an office hours to share what we've
been learning and doing over the past month:
Juju Office Hours is a freeflow meeting where we
On 07/07/16 10:28, Robin Winslow wrote:
> Thanks everyone, some really helpful suggestions there.
>
> > On the storage roadmap we have shared filesystems, so your underlying
> > cloud could provide these and Juju would organise them to be in the
> > right place for each unit.
>
> Is there any
Thanks everyone, some really helpful suggestions there.
> On the storage roadmap we have shared filesystems, so your underlying
> cloud could provide these and Juju would organise them to be in the
> right place for each unit.
Is there any information online that you could link me to about these
Robin, there's a few ways to go about it. CephFS has come up with some of
our team and at this time it's not something that folks are relying on
production so I'm hesitant to vote up/down on that.
You question on the NFS charm got me thinking that we do have a storage
subordinate that's been used
I should also have mentioned that there are IIRC a few bundles which
actually setup an NFS server and clients in the bundle in order to
provide this entirely internally to the bundle (i.e. without any cloud
or juju mediated storage management).
Mark
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi Robin,
Interesting question, I'm expecting a lot of answers and comments :). Here
are mines:
* If the volume of data is small and its life expectancy is long, with few
writes, but potentially lots of reads (like config files for example), you
may want to use a simple system like etcd or
On 07/07/16 06:02, Robin Winslow wrote:
> Does anyone know of the best way to share a folder between Juju units
> in a persistent and reliable way?
On the storage roadmap we have shared filesystems, so your underlying
cloud could provide these and Juju would organise them to be in the
right place
Does anyone know of the best way to share a folder between Juju units in a
persistent and reliable way?
Up until now we've been dealing with shared data that needs persistence by
storing it in Swift, and so I have written my applications to interact with
a Swift server directly (and therefore the
13 matches
Mail list logo